Volume 58, Issue 3 pp. 285-291
Coronary Artery Disease

Effect of a closure device on complication rates in high-local-risk patients: Results of a randomized multicenter trial

Bernard Chevalier MD

Corresponding Author

Bernard Chevalier MD

Centre Cardiologique du Nord, Saint-Denis, France

Centre Cardiologique du Nord, 32-36 rue des Moulins-Gemeaux, 93200 Saint-Denis, FranceSearch for more papers by this author
Bernard Lancelin MD

Bernard Lancelin MD

Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue, Le Plessis Robinson, France

Search for more papers by this author
Rene Koning MD

Rene Koning MD

Charles NICOLLE, Rouen, France

Search for more papers by this author
Michel Henry MD

Michel Henry MD

Polyclinique d'Essay les Nancy, France

Search for more papers by this author
Antoine Gommeaux MD

Antoine Gommeaux MD

Polyclinique de Bois Bernard, Bois Bernard, France

Search for more papers by this author
Remy Pilliere MD

Remy Pilliere MD

Clinique Ambroise Paré, Neuilly sur Seine, France

Search for more papers by this author
Meyer Elbaz MD

Meyer Elbaz MD

CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France

Search for more papers by this author
Thierry Lefevre MD

Thierry Lefevre MD

Institut Cardio-Vasculaire Paris Sud, Massy, France

Search for more papers by this author
Kamel Boughalem MD

Kamel Boughalem MD

Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Jean Marco MD

Jean Marco MD

Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France

Search for more papers by this author
Patrick Dupouy MD

Patrick Dupouy MD

Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 February 2003
Citations: 82

Abstract

Clinical trials have shown that coronary stenting is associated with a high level of complications at the access site. Arterial sealing devices have proven their efficacy in obtaining immediate hemostasis after sheath removal, in allowing early ambulation, and in improving patient comfort. However, there is no report showing a reduction of local complications related to their use. The purpose of this multicenter study was to compare randomly the efficacy of Angio-Seal versus compression methods of hemostasis in reducing the rate of access site complications after coronary angioplasty in 612 selected patients with higher risk of local events satisfying at least one of the following high-risk criteria: age > 70, previous puncture at the same site, history of hypertension, treatment with ticlopidine at least 2 days before the procedure, use of abciximab, 8 Fr access, prolonged heparin treatment after the angioplasty, and use of lytics if fibrinogen > 1 g/l. Group A (n = 306) had immediate sheath removal, Angio-Seal implantation, and cessation of bed rest 4 hr after the intervention. Group B (n = 306) had sheath removal according to local practice and cessation of bed rest 6–18 hr after the hemostasis procedure, also according to local practice. Clinical follow-up was done at 1 hr, 4 hr, 24 hr, discharge, and 7 days and a systematic color flow duplex sonography was performed to confirm diagnosis of access site complication. In group A, device deployment and immediate hemostasis were obtained in, respectively, 96.8% and 87% of patients. Time to hemostasis was shorter in group A: 5 vs. 52 min (P < 0.001). Cessation of bed rest was dramatically reduced in group A (438 ± 450 min) vs. group B (952 ± 308 min; P < 0.001). The cumulative rate of complications, using a composite primary endpoint, at 7 days was significantly different between the two groups: 5.9% of group A patients and 18% of group B patients (P < 0.001). This difference was mainly due to the dramatic reduction of prolonged bleeding in group A patients. Angio-Seal device use in high-local-risk patients allows immediate sheath removal and hemostasis with a reduction of local event rate despite a higher level of anticoagulation, compared to regular compression techniques, directly related to a dramatic decrease of prolonged bleeding. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2003;58:285–291. © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.