Routine Rigidity and Environmental Sustainability: Why Rational Innovations are Regularly Ignored
Corresponding Author
Kenneth Dooley
The Department of Built Environment, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
Correspondence to: Kenneth Dooley, The Department of Built Environment, Aalto University, Espoo Finland.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Kenneth Dooley
The Department of Built Environment, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
Correspondence to: Kenneth Dooley, The Department of Built Environment, Aalto University, Espoo Finland.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Rigidities describe the sluggishness of an organization's response in the face of discontinuous external change, and routine rigidity is the failure to change the organization's processes. This article aims to provide empirical evidence that substantiates the relevance of routine rigidity in the discussion on environmental sustainability. A qualitative approach employs a logic model to analyse two sequences of events and tracks the implementation of innovations that had been overlooked for some time. The evidence shows that the selected organizational innovations were previously inhibited by a failure to change the organization's formal processes and informal cultural norms. This is especially true of innovations that altered the daily routines of the focal firm's employees and of innovations that potentially alienated customers. The characteristics of the innovations (high impact and low barrier to implementation) indicate that firms are now less able to justify inaction through the traditional barriers of environmentally focused innovation. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
References
- Aguilera-Caracuel J, Ortiz-de-Mandojana N. 2013. Green innovation and financial performance: an institutional approach. Organization and Environment 26(4): 365–385.
- Bleda M, Shackley S. 2008. The dynamics of belief in climate change and its risks in business organisations. Ecological Economics 66(2/3): 517–532.
- Boons F, Wagner M. 2009. Assessing the relationship between economic and ecological performance: distinguishing system levels and the role of innovation. Ecological Economics 68(7): 1908–1914.
- Christensen CM. 1997. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
- Creswell JW. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th edition. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
- del Río P, Carrillo-Hermosilla J, Könnölä T. 2010. Policy strategies to promote eco-innovation. Journal of Industrial Ecology 14(4): 541–557.
- del Río González P. 2009. The empirical analysis of the determinants for environmental technological change: a research agenda. Ecological Economics 68(3): 861–878.
- Dickson PR. 1992. Toward a general theory of competitive rationality. Journal of Marketing 56: 69–83.
- Dooley K. 2017. Value chain systemicity: promoting organizational creativity and environmental sustainability in low velocity industries. Journal of Cleaner Production 140: 1903–1913.
- Doran J, Ryan G. 2016. The importance of the diverse drivers and types of environmental innovation for firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment 25(2): 102–119.
- Dutton JE, Jackson S. 1987. Categorizing strategic issues: links to organizational action. Academy of Management Review 12(1): 76–90.
- Eggers JP, Kaplan S. 2009. Cognition and renewal: comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organization Science 20(2): 461–477.
- European Commission. 2011. A Roadmap for Moving to a Competitive Low Carbon Economy in 2050. European Commission: Brussles.
- Forsman H. 2013. Environmental innovations as a source of competitive advantage or vice versa? Business Strategy and the Environment 22(5): 306–320.
- Foxon T, Pearson P. 2008. Overcoming barriers to innovation and diffusion of cleaner technologies: some features of a sustainable innovation policy regime. Journal of Cleaner Production 16(1S1): S148–S161.
- Gilbert CG. 2005. Unbundling the structure of inertia: resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of Management Journal 48(5): 741–763.
- Hannan MT, Freeman J. 1977. The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology 82(5): 929–964.
- Hannan MT, Freeman J. 1984. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review 49(2): 149–164.
- Hansen EG, Grosse-Dunker F, Reichwald R. 2009. Sustainability innovation cube – a framework to evaluate sustainability-oriented innovations. International Journal of Innovation Management 13(4): 683–713.
10.1142/S1363919609002479 Google Scholar
- Hart SL, Milstein MB. 2003. Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Executive 17(2): 56–67.
- Henderson RM, Clark KB. 1990. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 9–30.
- Hofmann KH, Theyel G, Wood CH. 2012. Identifying firm capabilities as drivers of environmental management and sustainability practices – evidence from small and medium-sized manufacturers. Business Strategy and the Environment 21(8): 530–545.
- Horbach J, Rammer C, Rennings K. 2012. Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact – the role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics 78: 112–122.
- Huff JO, Huff AS, Thomas H. 1992. Strategic renewal and the interaction of cumulative stress and inertia. Strategic Management Journal 13(S1): 55–75.
- Jackson T. 2009. Prosperity Without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet. Earthscan: London.
10.4324/9781849774338 Google Scholar
- Kaplan S, Henderson R. 2005. Inertia and incentives: bridging organizational economics and organizational theory. Organization Science 16(5): 509–521.
- Könnölä T, Unruh GC. 2007. Really changing the course: the limitations of environmental management systems for innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment 16(8): 525–537.
- Lenox M, Ehrenfield J. 1997. Organizing for effective environmental design. Business Strategy and the Environment 6(4): 187–196.
10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199709)6:4<187::AID-BSE113>3.0.CO;2-R Google Scholar
- Long TB, Blok V, Coninx I. 2016. Barriers to the adoption and diffusion of technological innovations for climate-smart agriculture in Europe: evidence from the Netherlands, France, Switzerland and Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production 112(1): 9–21.
- McMaster R, Sawkins JW. 1996. The contract state, trust distortion, and efficiency. Review of Social Economy 54(2): 145–167.
- Meehan J, Bryde D. 2011. Sustainable procurement practice. Business Strategy and the Environment 20(2): 94–106.
- Miller D, Friesen PH. 1980. Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal 23: 591–614.
- Moon S, Bae S, Jeong M. 2014. Corporate sustainability and economic performance: an empirical analysis of a voluntary environmental program in the USA. Business Strategy and the Environment 23(8): 534–546.
- Nelson RR, Winter SG. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press: Boston, MA.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2005. Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data: Oslo Manual, 3rd edition. OECD: Paris.
- Peters GP, Andrew RM, Boden T, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Le Quéré C, Marland G, Raupach MR, Wilson C. 2013. The challenge to keep global warming below 2 °C. Nature Climate Change 3(1): 4–6.
- Porter ME, van der Linde C. 1995. Toward a new conception of the environment–competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4): 97–118.
- Qi GY, Shen LY, Zeng SX, Ochoa JJ. 2010. The drivers for contractors' green innovation: an industry perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 18(14): 1358–1365.
- Rassier DG, Earnhart D. 2015. Effects of environmental regulation on actual and expected profitability. Ecological Economics 112: 129–140.
- Rehfeld K, Rennings K, Ziegler A. 2007. Integrated product policy and environmental product innovations: an empirical analysis. Ecological Economics 61(1): 91–100.
- Reinhardt FL. 2000. Down to Earth: Applying Business Principles to Environmental Management. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
- Rennings K. 2000. Redefining innovation – eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics 32(2): 319–332.
- Rogelj J, McCollum DL, Reisinger A, Meinshausen M, Riahi K. 2013. Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation. Nature 493: 79–83.
- Rogers EM. 1983. Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd edition. Free Press: New York.
- Shrivastava P. 1995. Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 16(S1): 183–200.
- Simboli A, Taddeo R, Morgante A. 2014. Analysing the development of Industrial Symbiosis in a motorcycle local industrial network: the role of contextual factors. Journal of Cleaner Production 66: 372–383.
- Teece D, Pisano G. 1994. The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change 3(3): 537–556.
10.1093/icc/3.3.537-a Google Scholar
- Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18(7): 509–533.
- Tidd J, Bessant J. 2013. Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, 5th edition. Wiley: Chichester.
- Tripsas M, Gavetti G. 2000. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal 21(10/11): 1147–1161.
- Winter SG. 2000. The satisficing principle in capability learning. Strategic Management Journal 21(10/11): 981–996.
- Winter SG. 2003. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 24(10): 991–995.
- Wong SKS. 2013. Environmental requirements, knowledge sharing and green innovation: empirical evidence from the electronics industry in China. Business Strategy and the Environment 2(5): 321–338.
- Yin RK. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th edition. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.