RESEARCH ARTICLE
Mapping Environmental, Social, and Governance Controversies and Corporate Financial Performance: Insights From Bibliometric and Content Analyses
Nejla Ould Daoud Ellili,
Richard Yeaw Chong Seow,
Corresponding Author
Nejla Ould Daoud Ellili
College of Business, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, UAE
Correspondence:
Nejla Ould Daoud Ellili ([email protected])
Search for more papers by this authorRichard Yeaw Chong Seow
Pôle Paris Alternance (PPA) Business School, Paris, France
Search for more papers by this authorNejla Ould Daoud Ellili,
Richard Yeaw Chong Seow,
Corresponding Author
Nejla Ould Daoud Ellili
College of Business, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, UAE
Correspondence:
Nejla Ould Daoud Ellili ([email protected])
Search for more papers by this authorRichard Yeaw Chong Seow
Pôle Paris Alternance (PPA) Business School, Paris, France
Search for more papers by this authorFunding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Ellili Nejla Ould Daoud and Seow Richard Yeaw Chong are co-author.
ABSTRACT
This study explores the relationship between ESG controversies and corporate financial performance, focusing on key trends, influential contributions, and dominant theoretical frameworks and research methods in this area. It aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the evolving research landscape and its associated implications. It conducts a systematic literature review utilizing PRISMA protocols along with bibliometric and content analyses. Data were extracted from the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases, resulting in a final selection of 37 high-quality articles published between 2004 and 2024. The analysis identified stakeholder, legitimacy, and agency theories as the most frequently used theoretical frameworks. Results reveal a significant increase in publications since 2022, with ESG controversies affecting corporate financial performance through financial risks and reputational challenges. Key gaps include limited sector-specific research, short-term financial measures, the dominance of quantitative methodologies, and the incorporation of emerging technologies. The study is limited to the WoS and Scopus databases, focusing on peer-reviewed articles in English. It highlights opportunities for future research in emerging markets, sector-specific studies, and integrative qualitative and mixed-method approaches. The findings emphasize the importance of board independence and corporate social responsibility initiatives in addressing ESG controversies. Companies should align their corporate governance structures with ESG strategies to improve transparency, stakeholder trust, and financial resilience. This study offers a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of ESG controversies and corporate financial performance, providing valuable insights for academics, practitioners, and policymakers to explore this research area.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Open Research
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
References
- Agnese, P., F. Battaglia, F. Busato, and S. Taddeo. 2023. “ESG Controversies and Governance: Evidence From the Banking Industry.” Finance Research Letters 53: 103397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103397.
- Agnese, P., M. Cerciello, R. Oriani, and S. Taddeo. 2024. “ESG Controversies and Profitability in the European Banking Sector.” Finance Research Letters 61: 105042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105042.
- Antunes, J., P. Wanke, T. Fonseca, and Y. Tan. 2023. “Do ESG Risk Scores Influence Financial Distress? Evidence From A Dynamic NDEA Approach.” Sustainability 15, no. 9: 7560. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097560.
10.3390/su15097560 Google Scholar
- Aouadi, A., and S. Marsat. 2018. “Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence From International Data.” Journal of Business Ethics 151, no. 4: 1027–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3213-8.
- Becchetti, L., D. Cucinelli, F. Ielasi, and M. Rossolini. 2023. “Corporate Social Irresponsibility: The Relationship Between ESG Misconduct and the Cost of Equity.” International Review of Financial Analysis 89: 102833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102833.
- Bel-Oms, I. 2025. “Determinants and Consequences of Environmental, Social and Governance Controversies. Status Quo and Limitations of Recent Empirical Quantitative Research.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 32, no. 2: 2412–2437. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3071.
- Benabou, R., and J. Tirole. 2010. “Individual and Corporate Social Responsibility.” Economica 77, no. 305: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00843.x.
- Bolibok, P. M. 2024. “Does Firm Size Matter for ESG Risk? Cross-Sectional Evidence From the Banking Industry.” Sustainability 16, no. 2: 679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020679.
10.3390/su16020679 Google Scholar
- Brinette, S., F. D. Sonmez, and P. S. Tournus. 2024. “ESG Controversies and Firm Value: Moderating Role of Board Gender Diversity and Board Independence.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 71: 4298–4307. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3236667.
- Cai, C., S. A. Hazaea, M. F. Alsayegh, M. Sahu, M. Raid, and W. M. Al-ahdal. 2024. “Media Coverage as A Moderator in the Nexus Between Audit Quality and ESG Performance: Evidence From China.” PLoS One 19, no. 10: e0312510. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312510.
- Cohen, G. 2023. “The Impact of ESG Risks on Corporate Value.” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 60, no. 4: 1451–1468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-023-01135-6.
- Coleman, L. 2011. “Losses From Failure of Stakeholder Sensitive Processes: Financial Consequences for Large US Companies From Breakdowns in Product, Environmental, and Accounting Standards.” Journal of Business Ethics 98, no. 2: 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0544-8.
- DasGupta, R. 2022. “Financial Performance Shortfall, ESG Controversies, and ESG Performance: Evidence From Firms Around the World.” Finance Research Letters 46: 102487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102487.
- de Abreu Passos, G., and P. P. de Campos-Rasera. 2024. “Do ESG Controversies Influence Firm Value? An Analysis With Longitudinal Data in Different Countries.” Brazilian Business Review 21, no. 4: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2022.1326.en.
10.15728/bbr.2022.1326.en Google Scholar
- De Giuli, M. E., D. Grechi, and A. Tanda. 2024. “What Do we Know About ESG and Risk? A Systematic and Bibliometric Review.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 31, no. 2: 1096–1108. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2624.
10.1002/csr.2624 Google Scholar
- Dogru, T., E. Akyildirim, O. Cepni, O. Ozdemir, A. Sharma, and M. H. Yilmaz. 2022. “The Effect of Environmental, Social and Governance Risks.” Annals of Tourism Research 95: 103432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2022.103432.
- Donthu, N., S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim. 2021. “How to Conduct a Bibliometric Analysis: An Overview and Guidelines.” Journal of Business Research 133: 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
- Dorfleitner, G., C. Kreuzer, and C. Sparrer. 2020. “ESG Controversies and Controversial ESG: About Silent Saints and Small Sinners.” Journal of Asset Management 21, no. 5: 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-020-00178-x.
- Elamer, A. A., and M. Boulhaga. 2024. “ESG Controversies and Corporate Performance: The Moderating Effect of Governance Mechanisms and ESG Practices.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 31, no. 4: 3312–3327. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2749.
- Ellili, N. O. D. 2022. “Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review of Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure Papers: Current Topics and Recommendations for Future Research.” Environmental Research Communications 4, no. 9: 092001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/AC8B67.
- Ellili, N. O. D. 2023. “Is There Any Association Between FinTech and Sustainability? Evidence From Bibliometric Review and Content Analysis.” Journal of Financial Services Marketing 28, no. 4: 748–762. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-022-00200-w.
10.1057/s41264-022-00200-w Google Scholar
- Ellili, N. O. D. 2024a. “Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainability Papers: Evidence From Environment, Development and Sustainability.” Environment, Development and Sustainability 26, no. 4: 8183–8209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03067-6.
- Ellili, N. O. D. 2024b. “Financial Inclusion and Sustainable Development: A Review and Research Agenda.” Journal of Financial Services Marketing 29, no. 4: 1345–1364. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-024-00269-5.
- Ford, J. M., S. A. Gehricke, and J. E. Zhang. 2022. “Option Traders Are Concerned About Climate Risks: ESG Ratings and Short-Term Sentiment.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 35: 100687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100687.
- Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.
10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540226 Google Scholar
- García-Amate, A., A. Ramírez-Orellana, A. A. Rojo-Ramírez, and M. P. Casado-Belmonte. 2023. “Do ESG Controversies Moderate the Relationship Between CSR and Corporate Financial Performance in Oil and Gas Firms?” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10, no. 1: 749. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02256-y.
10.1057/s41599-023-02256-y Google Scholar
- Giráldez-Puig, P., I. Moreno, L. Perez-Calero, and J. Guerrero Villegas. 2025. “ESG Controversies and Insolvency Risk: Evidence From the Insurance Industry.” Management Decision 63, no. 2: 610–639. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2023-2002.
- Hampl, F., and D. Vágnerová Linnertová. 2024. “How Do ESG Controversies Moderate the Nexus Between ESG Performance and Cost of Capital? Evidence From European Listed Companies.” Managerial Finance 50, no. 10: 1727–1746. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-12-2023-0762.
10.1108/MF-12-2023-0762 Google Scholar
- Harzing, A.-W. 2019. “Two New Kids on the Block: How Do Crossref and Dimensions Compare With Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus and the Web of Science?” Scientometrics 120, no. 1: 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03114-y.
- Horobet, A., A. Smedoiu-Popoviciu, R. Oprescu, et al. 2024. “Seeing Through the Haze: Greenwashing and the Cost of Capital in Technology Firms.” Environment, Development and Sustainability. In Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04817-w.
- Jucá, M. N., P. D. Muren, A. Valentinčič, and R. Ichev. 2024. “The Impact of ESG Controversies on the Financial Performance of Firms: An Analysis of Industry and Country Clusters.” Borsa Istanbul Review 24, no. 6: 1305–1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2024.08.001.
- Khan, A., J. W. Goodell, M. K. Hassan, and A. Paltrinieri. 2022. “A Bibliometric Review of Finance Bibliometric Papers.” Finance Research Letters 47: 102520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102520.
- Kiflee, A. K. R., N. N. Hasbullah, N. H. Idris, H. Harun, M. H. Bakar, and S. Anwar. 2024. “A Bibliometric Analysis of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Firm Performance: A Pathway to Advancing SDG Movement.” Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review 4, no. 2: e01977. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v4.n02.pe01977.
10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v4.n02.pe01977 Google Scholar
- Krüger, P. 2015. “Corporate Goodness and Shareholder Wealth.” Journal of Financial Economics 115, no. 2: 304–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.008.
- Kweh, Q. L., I. W. K. Ting, C. Ren, and J. Asif. 2024. “How Do Environmental, Social and Governance Initiatives and Controversies Explain the Firm Efficiency of Chinese Energy Companies?” Kybernetes. In Press. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2023-2704.
10.1108/K-12-2023-2704 Google Scholar
- La Rosa, F., and F. Bernini. 2022. “ESG Controversies and the Cost of Equity Capital of European Listed Companies: The Moderating Effects of ESG Performance and Market Securities Regulation.” International Journal of Accounting and Information Management 30, no. 5: 641–663. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-03-2022-0047.
- Lee, S.-P., and M. Isa. 2024. “ESG and ESG Controversies on Firm Risks in the Emerging Markets: The Moderating Roles of Shariah Screening and Legal Origins.” ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance 16, no. 1: 127–149. https://doi.org/10.55188/ijif.v16i1.627.
10.55188/ijif.v16i1.627 Google Scholar
- Lim, W. M. 2025. “Systematic Literature Reviews: Reflections, Recommendations, and Robustness Check.” Journal of Consumer Behaviour. In Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2479.
- Mandas, M., O. Lahmar, L. Piras, and R. De Lisa. 2024. “ESG Reputational Risk and Market Valuation: Evidence From the European Banking Industry.” Research in International Business and Finance 69: 102286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102286.
- Mansour, M., M. F. Shubita, A. Lutfi, M. W. A. Saleh, and M. Saad. 2024. “Female CEOs and Green Innovation: Evidence From Asian Firms.” Sustainability 16, no. 21: 9404. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219404.
- Martín-Martín, A., M. Thelwall, E. Orduna-Malea, and D. E. López-Cózar. 2021. “Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and Opencitations' COCI: A Multidisciplinary Comparison of Coverage via Citations.” Scientometrics 126, no. 1: 871–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4.
- Mendiratta, A., S. Singh, S. S. Yadav, and A. Mahajan. 2023a. “ESG Controversies and Firm Performance in India: The Moderating Impact of Government Effectiveness.” Global Business Review. In Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509231151490.
- Mendiratta, A., S. Singh, S. S. Yadav, and A. Mahajan. 2023b. “When Do ESG Controversies Reduce Firm Value in India?” Global Finance Journal 55: 100809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2023.100809.
10.1016/j.gfj.2023.100809 Google Scholar
- Mengist, W., T. Soromessa, and G. Legese. 2020. “Ecosystem Services Research in Mountainous Regions: A Systematic Literature Review on Current Knowledge and Research Gaps.” Science of the Total Environment 702: 134581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134581.
- Mukherjee, D., W. M. Lim, S. Kumar, and N. Donthu. 2022. “Guidelines for Advancing Theory and Practice Through Bibliometric Research.” Journal of Business Research 148: 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042.
- Nicolas, M. L. D., A. Desroziers, F. Caccioli, and T. Aste. 2024. “ESG Reputation Risk Matters: An Event Study Based on Social Media Data.” Finance Research Letters 59: 104712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104712.
- Rahat, B., and P. Nguyen. 2024. “The Impact of ESG Profile on Firm's Valuation in Emerging Markets.” International Review of Financial Analysis 95: 103361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103361.
- Saleh, M. W. A., S. M. Alshdaifat, M. F. Shubita, M. Mansour, and A. Lutfi. 2025. “Gender Diversity and Environmental, Social, and Governance: Unlocking Solutions to Corporate Risk.” Business Strategy and Development 8, no. 1: e70097. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.70097.
- Saleh, M. W. A., D. Eleyan, and Z. S. Maigoshi. 2024. “Moderating Effect of CEO Power on Institutional Ownership and Performance.” EuroMed Journal of Business 19, no. 3: 442–461. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-12-2021-0193.
- Saleh, M. W. A., and Z. S. Maigoshi. 2024. “The Nexus of ESG and Environmental Sustainability: Does Gender Diversity Make a Difference in Asian Companies?” Environment, Development and Sustainability. In Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04498-5.
- Saleh, M. W. A., and M. Mansour. 2024. “Is Audit Committee Busyness Associated With Earnings Management? The Moderating Role of Foreign Ownership.” Accounting Research Journal 37, no. 1: 80–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-04-2023-0106.
10.1108/ARJ-04-2023-0106 Google Scholar
- Samaniego-Medina, R., and P. Giraldez-Puig. 2022. “Do Sustainability Risks Affect Credit Ratings? Evidence From European Banks.” Amfiteatru Economic 24, no. 61: 720. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2022/61/720.
10.24818/EA/2022/61/720 Google Scholar
- Schiemann, F., and R. Tietmeyer. 2022. “ESG Controversies, ESG Disclosure and Analyst Forecast Accuracy.” International Review of Financial Analysis 84: 102373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102373.
- Seow, R. Y. C. 2024a. “Determinants of Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure: A Systematic Literature Review.” Business Strategy and the Environment 33, no. 3: 2314–2330. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.3604.
- Seow, R. Y. C. 2024b. “Unveiling the Complexities of ESG and CSR Disclosures Determinants: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Technology Management and Business 11, no. 1: 49–79. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtmb.2024.11.01.004.
10.30880/jtmb.2024.11.01.004 Google Scholar
- Seow, R. Y. C. 2025. “Environmental, Social, and Governance Reporting in Family Firms: The Critical Role of CEO Attributes.” Business Strategy and the Environment 34, no. 1: 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3984.
- Shakil, M. H. 2021. “Environmental, Social and Governance Performance and Financial Risk: Moderating Role of ESG Controversies and Board Gender Diversity.” Resources Policy 72: 102144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102144.
- Shakil, M. H. 2024. “Environmental, Social and Governance Controversies: A Bibliometric Review and Research Agenda.” Finance Research Letters 70: 106325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106325.
- Soschinski, C. K., S. Mazzioni, C. B. D. Magro, and M. Leite. 2024. “Corporate Controversies and Market-To-Book: The Moderating Role of ESG Practices.” Review of Business Management 26, no. 1: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v26i01.4255.
10.7819/rbgn.v26i01.4255 Google Scholar
- Tarjo, T., A. Anggono, J. Said, and E. Sakti. 2024. “Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Fraud: A Bibliometric Study and Systematic Literature Review.” E3S Web of Conferences 499: 01002. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202449901002.
10.1051/e3sconf/202449901002 Google Scholar
- Teng, X., Y. Wang, A. Wang, B.-G. Chang, and K.-S. Wu. 2021. “Environmental, Social, Governance Risk and Corporate Sustainable Growth Nexus: Quantile Regression Approach.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 20: 10865. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010865.
- Ting, I. W. K., N. A. Azizan, R. K. Bhaskaran, and S. K. Sukumaran. 2020. “Corporate Social Performance and Firm Performance: Comparative Study Among Developed and Emerging Market Firms.” Sustainability 12, no. 1: 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010026.
- Treepongkaruna, S., K. Kyaw, and P. Jiraporn. 2024a. “ESG Controversies and Corporate Governance: Evidence From Board Size.” Business Strategy and the Environment 33, no. 5: 4218–4232. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3697.
- Treepongkaruna, S., K. Kyaw, and P. Jiraporn. 2024b. “ESG Controversies, Corporate Governance, and the Market for Corporate Control.” Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 14, no. 4: 815–842. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2024.2334253.
- Tsang, A., T. Frost, and H. Cao. 2023. “Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Disclosure: A Literature Review.” British Accounting Review 55, no. 1: 101149. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BAR.2022.101149.
- Visser, M., N. J. van Eck, and L. Waltman. 2021. “Large-Scale Comparison of Bibliographic Data Sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic.” Quantitative Science Studies 2, no. 1: 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00112.
- Wu, Z., S. Lin, T. Chen, C. Luo, and H. Xu. 2023. “Does Effective Corporate Governance Mitigate the Negative Effect of ESG Controversies on Firm Value?” Economic Analysis and Policy 80: 1772–1793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.11.018.
10.1016/j.eap.2023.11.018 Google Scholar
- Xue, R., H. Wang, Y. Yang, M. K. Linnenluecke, K. Jin, and C. W. Cai. 2023. “The Adverse Impact of Corporate ESG Controversies on Sustainable Investment.” Journal of Cleaner Production 427: 139237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139237.
