Volume 10, Issue 6 pp. 573-580
Research Article
Full Access

Lack of effect of co-trimoxazole on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered theophylline

K. F. Lo

K. F. Lo

School of Pharmacy, South Australian Institute of Technology, Adelaide, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Dr. R. L. Nation

Corresponding Author

Dr. R. L. Nation

School of Pharmacy, South Australian Institute of Technology, Adelaide, Australia

School of Pharmacy, South Australian Institute of Technology, North Terrace, Adelaide, 5000, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this author
L. N. Sansom

L. N. Sansom

School of Pharmacy, South Australian Institute of Technology, Adelaide, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: November/December 1989
Citations: 2

Abstract

Eight healthy, male subjects participated in a balanced randomized crossover study to investigate the effect of a course of co-trimoxazole (CT; combination of sulphamethoxazole 800 mg and trimethoprim 160 mg, twice daily for 5 days) on the pharmacokinetics and urinary metabolite profile of an orally administered dose of theophylline (TH). There were no significant differences (p > 0·05) between the control and treatment phases with respect to any of the following pharmacokinetic parameters of TH: area under the plasma total TH concentration-time curve; fraction unbound in plasma; area under the plasma unbound TH concentration-time curve; terminal half-life; apparent volume of distribution; apparent total plasma clearance and renal clearance. The urinary recoveries of 1-methyluric acid, 1,3-dimethyluric acid and of theophylline were not significantly different (p > 0·05) between the two study phases. There was a significant difference (p < 0·05), however, in the urinary recovery of 3-methylxanthine (11·3 ± 2·6 per cent TH alone versus 13·9 ± 3·6 per cent TH-CT) and in the total urinary recovery of TH and its metabolites (76·5 ± 8·2 per cent versus 85·3 ± 7·0 per cent), the latter finding suggesting that CT may have caused a small increase in the extent of TH absorption. The results of the study indicated that CT did not inhibit the biotransformation of TH.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.