Volume 22, Issue 5-6 pp. 559-572
Research Article

Bayesian predictive inference under informative sampling and transformation

Balgobin Nandram

Corresponding Author

Balgobin Nandram

Department of Mathematical Sciences, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 100 Institute Road, Worcester, MA 01609, U.S.A.

Department of Mathematical Sciences, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 100 Institute Road, Worcester, MA 01609, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this author
Jai Won Choi

Jai Won Choi

Office of Research and Methodology, National Center for Health Statistics, CDC 3311 Toledo Road, Hyattsville, MD 20782, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Gang Shen

Gang Shen

Department of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1399, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Corinne Burgos

Corinne Burgos

Department of Mathematical Sciences, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 100 Institute Road, Worcester, MA 01609, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 December 2006
Citations: 2

Abstract

We consider the problem in which a biased sample is selected from a finite population (a random sample from a super-population), and inference is required for the finite population mean and the super-population mean. The selection probabilities are linearly related to the measurements, providing a non-ignorable selection model. When all the selection probabilities are known, as in our problem, inference about the finite population mean and the super-population mean can be made. As a practical issue, our method requires normality, but the measurements are not necessarily normally distributed. Thus, the key issue is the dilemma that a transformation to normality is needed, but this transformation will destroy the linearity between the selection probabilities and the measurements. This is the key issue we address in this work. We use the Gibbs sampler and the sample importance resampling algorithm to fit the non-ignorable selection model to a simple example on natural gas production. Our non-ignorable selection model estimates the finite population mean production much closer to the true finite population mean than a model which ignores the selection probabilities, and there is improved precision of the non-ignorable selection model over this latter model. A naive 95% credible interval based on the Horvitz–Thompson estimator is too wide. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.