Volume 62, Issue 1 pp. 222-233
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Efficacy and safety of rituximab in moderately-to-severely active systemic lupus erythematosus: The randomized, double-blind, phase ii/iii systemic lupus erythematosus evaluation of rituximab trial

Joan T. Merrill

Corresponding Author

Joan T. Merrill

Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City

Dr. Merrill has received speaking fees, consulting fees, and/or honoraria from Genentech, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MedImmune, UCB, Wyeth, and Cephalon (less than $10,000 each), and has consulted with investment analysts.

Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Clinical Pharmacology Research Program, MS 22, 825 Northeast 13th Street, Oklahoma City, OK 73104Search for more papers by this author
C. Michael Neuwelt

C. Michael Neuwelt

Alameda County Medical Center, Oakland, California

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel J. Wallace

Daniel J. Wallace

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, and University of California, Los Angeles

Dr. Wallace has received speaking fees, consulting fees, and/or honoraria from Genentech (less than $10,000).

Search for more papers by this author
Joseph C. Shanahan

Joseph C. Shanahan

Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

Dr. Shanahan has received speaking fees, consulting fees, and/or honoraria from Genentech, Actelion, and Cypress (less than $10,000 each), and owns stock or stock options in Schering-Plough.

Search for more papers by this author
Kevin M. Latinis

Kevin M. Latinis

University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City

Dr. Latinis has received speaking fees, consulting fees, and/or honoraria from Genentech (less than $10,000).

Search for more papers by this author
James C. Oates

James C. Oates

Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina, and Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston

Dr. Oates has received speaking fees, consulting fees, and/or honoraria from Genentech (less than $10,000).

Search for more papers by this author
Tammy O. Utset

Tammy O. Utset

University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

Dr. Utset has received advisory board fees from Genentech (more than $10,000).

Search for more papers by this author
Caroline Gordon

Caroline Gordon

University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

Dr. Gordon has received speaking fees, consulting fees, and/or honoraria from Roche Pharmaceuticals and Genentech (less than $10,000 each).

Search for more papers by this author
David A. Isenberg

David A. Isenberg

University College London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Hsin-Ju Hsieh

Hsin-Ju Hsieh

Genentech, San Francisco, California

Dr. Hsieh owns stock or stock options in Genentech.

Search for more papers by this author
David Zhang

David Zhang

Genentech, San Francisco, California

Search for more papers by this author
Paul G. Brunetta

Paul G. Brunetta

Genentech, San Francisco, California

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 December 2009
Citations: 1,122

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00137969.

Abstract

Objective

B cells are likely to contribute to the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and rituximab induces depletion of B cells. The Exploratory Phase II/III SLE Evaluation of Rituximab (EXPLORER) trial tested the efficacy and safety of rituximab versus placebo in patients with moderately-to-severely active extrarenal SLE.

Methods

Patients entered with ≥1 British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A score or ≥2 BILAG B scores despite background immunosuppressant therapy, which was continued during the trial. Prednisone was added and subsequently tapered. Patients were randomized at a ratio of 2:1 to receive rituximab (1,000 mg) or placebo on days 1, 15, 168, and 182.

Results

In the intent-to-treat analysis of 257 patients, background treatment was evenly distributed among azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and methotrexate. Fifty-three percent of the patients had ≥1 BILAG A score at entry, and 57% of the patients were categorized as being steroid dependent. No differences were observed between placebo and rituximab in the primary and secondary efficacy end points, including the BILAG-defined response, in terms of both area under the curve and landmark analyses. A beneficial effect of rituximab on the primary end point was observed in the African American and Hispanic subgroups. Safety and tolerability were similar in patients receiving placebo and those receiving rituximab.

Conclusion

The EXPLORER trial enrolled patients with moderately-to-severely active SLE and used aggressive background treatment and sensitive cutoffs for nonresponse. No differences were noted between placebo and rituximab in the primary and secondary end points. Further evaluation of patient subsets, biomarkers, and exploratory outcome models may improve the design of future SLE clinical trials.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me