Volume 50, Issue 12 pp. 3904-3909
Research Article

The effect of body weight on progression of knee osteoarthritis is dependent on alignment

David T. Felson

Corresponding Author

David T. Felson

Boston University Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training, and the Arthritis Center, Boston, Massachusetts

A207, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02118Search for more papers by this author
Joyce Goggins

Joyce Goggins

Boston University Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training, and the Arthritis Center, Boston, Massachusetts

Search for more papers by this author
Jingbo Niu

Jingbo Niu

Boston University Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training, and the Arthritis Center, Boston, Massachusetts

Search for more papers by this author
Yuqing Zhang

Yuqing Zhang

Boston University Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training, and the Arthritis Center, Boston, Massachusetts

Search for more papers by this author
David J. Hunter

David J. Hunter

Boston University Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training, and the Arthritis Center, Boston, Massachusetts

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 December 2004
Citations: 249

Abstract

Objective

Whereas obesity increases overall loading of the knee, limb malalignment concentrates that loading on a focal area, to the level at which cartilage damage may occur. This study evaluated whether the effect of body weight on progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA) differs depending on the degree of limb malalignment.

Methods

The study population comprised 228 veterans and community recruits with symptomatic knee OA (pain on most days and radiographic disease) who volunteered to participate in a natural history study and from whom baseline radiographs were obtained to assess alignment; 227 (99.6%) completed a 30-month followup. Of 403 knees assessed at baseline, 394 (97.8%) were followed up. Participants' body mass index (BMI) was assessed at each examination. The main outcome measure was progression of knee OA, defined as narrowing of the tibiofemoral joint space by 1 grade (semiquantitative scale 0–3) on radiographs of the fluoroscopically positioned knee. The association between BMI and the risk of knee OA progression was assessed after adjusting for age, sex, and limb alignment, using logistic regression and generalized estimating equations.

Results

Of 394 knees, 90 (22.8%) showed disease progression, and limb alignment was strongly associated with progression risk. The risk of progression increased with increasing weight (for each 2-unit increase in BMI, odds ratio [OR] for progression 1.08, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.00–1.16). However, among those knees with neutral alignment (0–2°), increases in BMI had no effect on risk of progression (OR 1.00), and in those with severe malalignment (≥7°), the effect was similarly null (OR 0.93). The effect of BMI on progression was limited to knees in which there was moderate malalignment (OR per 2-unit increase in BMI 1.23, 95% CI 1.05–1.45).

Conclusion

Although elevated BMI increases the risk of knee OA progression, the effect of BMI is limited to knees in which moderate malalignment exists, presumably because of the combined focus of load from malalignment and the excess load from increased weight. This has implications for clinical recommendations and for trials testing weight loss in those with knee OA.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me