Volume 96, Issue 2 pp. 423-434

Flow marks in injection molding of polypropylene and ethylene–propylene elastomer blends: Analysis of morphology and rheology

Bhaskar Patham

Bhaskar Patham

Department of Chemical Engineering & Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

Search for more papers by this author
Paul Papworth

Paul Papworth

Department of Chemical Engineering & Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

Search for more papers by this author
Krishnamurthy Jayaraman

Corresponding Author

Krishnamurthy Jayaraman

Department of Chemical Engineering & Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

Department of Chemical Engineering & Materials Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824===Search for more papers by this author
Chichang Shu

Chichang Shu

Basell Polyolefins USA, Elkton, Maryland 21921

Search for more papers by this author
Michael D. Wolkowicz

Michael D. Wolkowicz

Basell Polyolefins USA, Elkton, Maryland 21921

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 February 2005
Citations: 30

Abstract

This paper reports an investigation of asynchronous flow marks on the surface of injection molded parts and short shots made from two different blends of polypropylene and ethylene–propylene random copolymer elastomers. Flow marks were observed on the surface with both blends; the spatial frequency of flow marks on the surface was greater in the blend B1, which also exhibited a greater contrast between the surface regions. The same blend was distinctly faster in the linear viscoelastic tests of shear creep recovery and shear viscosity growth. The degree of contrast between the flow-mark regions and the out-of-flow-mark regions was examined with a detailed analysis of SEM micrographs of the surface regions as well as the near wall regions from short shots. This revealed that the dispersed phase was highly stretched to cylindrical strands in the glossy surface regions of both blends and retracted in the dull regions to different extents in the two cases. A comparison of the particle size distributions and aspect ratio distributions in different regions established that rapid retraction of the suspended elastomer phase was the dominant cause of changes in particle shape between surface regions. Nonlinear shear creep and creep recovery curves of the two elastomer components showed that at a time of 1 s, the fractional strain recovery of the elastomer in B1 was much higher than that of the elastomer in B2. Hence, the nonlinear elastic recovery of the elastomer phase at short times is an important factor in flow mark formation with blends of polypropylene and olefinic elastomers. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 96: 423–434, 2005

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.