Volume 45, Issue 9 pp. 1545-1556
Article
Full Access

Study of curative interactions in cis-1,4-polyisoprene. XII. The cis-1,4-polyisoprene–sulfur–tetramethylthiuram disulphide–ZnO–stearic acid vulcanization system

F. W. H. Kruger

F. W. H. Kruger

Polymer Chemistry, University of Port Elizabeth, P.O. Box 1600, Port Elizabeth, 6000, South Africa

Search for more papers by this author
W. J. McGill

Corresponding Author

W. J. McGill

Polymer Chemistry, University of Port Elizabeth, P.O. Box 1600, Port Elizabeth, 6000, South Africa

Polymer Chemistry, University of Port Elizabeth, P.O. Box 1600, Port Elizabeth, 6000, South Africa===Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 July 1992
Citations: 16

Abstract

Several aspects on the mechanism of vulcanization in the synthetic cis-1,4-polyisoprene (IR)-sulfur-tetramethylthiuram disulphide (TMTD)–ZnO system were harmonized. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermograms showed that the vulcanization processes became better resolved on increasing the curative loading in the compound. Two major crosslinking reactions occurred consecutively in the IR (100)–sulfur (9.46)–TMTD (8.86)–ZnO (3.00) mixture, viz the IR–sulfur–TMTD–ZnO and IR–sulfur–zinc dimethyldithiocarbamate (ZDMC) (or IR–sulfur–ZDMC–ZnO) reactions. In the first process poly-and disulfidic pendent groups RSxSX (R = polyisoprenyl, X = Me2NC (S), x ≥ 1) formed via the IR–XSSxSX reaction, and in the second via the IR–XSSxZnSSX reaction. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) data showed that dimethyldithiocarbamic acid liberated during the IR–sulfur–TMTD–ZnO reaction was trapped by ZnO to yield ZDMC. Hence ZDMC was a product, and not precursor, of this crosslinking process. A comparison of reactions in IR–sulfur–TMTD–ZnO and poly(ethylene-co-propylene)–sulfur–TMTD–ZnO mixtures showed that the participation of IR molecules was essential for ZDMC formation. The ZDMC concentration remained constant at ∼ 38.4 mol % during the later stages of cure, showing that it did not participate in the desulfuration reactions of polysulfidic links. In the presence of stearic acid the stearic acid–ZnO reaction occurred at 87°C as was manifested by an intense crystallization peak of zinc stearate. The vulcanization processes were the same both in the presence and absence of stearic acid.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.