Volume 58, Issue 44 pp. 15712-15716
Communication

Regulating Nonclassical Pathways of Silicalite-1 Crystallization through Controlled Evolution of Amorphous Precursors

Madhuresh K. Choudhary

Madhuresh K. Choudhary

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Dr. Manjesh Kumar

Dr. Manjesh Kumar

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Prof. Jeffrey D. Rimer

Corresponding Author

Prof. Jeffrey D. Rimer

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204 USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 31 August 2019
Citations: 44

Graphical Abstract

An evolutionary idea: Organic molecules in zeolite synthesis switch the predominant mode of silicalite-1 growth between classical and nonclassical pathways by mediating the degree to which silica nanoparticle precursors undergo microstructural evolution.

Abstract

Differentiating mechanisms of zeolite crystallization is challenging owing to the vast number of species in growth solutions. The presence of amorphous colloidal particles is ubiquitous in many zeolite syntheses, and has led to extensive efforts to understand the driving force(s) for their self-assembly and putative roles in processes of nucleation and growth. In this study, we use a combination of in situ scanning probe microscopy, particle dissolution measurements, and colloidal stability assays to elucidate the degree to which silica nanoparticles evolve in their structure during the early stages of silicalite-1 synthesis. We show how changes in precursor structure are mediated by the presence of organics, and demonstrate how these changes lead to significant differences in precursor–crystal interactions that alter preferred modes of crystal growth. Our findings provide guidelines for selectively controlling silicalite-1 growth by particle attachment or monomer addition, thus allowing for the manipulation of anisotropic rates of crystallization. In doing so, we also address a longstanding question regarding what factors are at our disposal to switch from a nonclassical to classical mechanism.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.