Volume 58, Issue 21 pp. 6846-6879
Review

Enzymatic Cascade Reactions in Biosynthesis

Prof. Dr. Christopher T. Walsh

Prof. Dr. Christopher T. Walsh

Stanford University Chemistry, Engineering, and Medicine for Human Health (CheM-H), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Prof. Dr. Bradley S. Moore

Corresponding Author

Prof. Dr. Bradley S. Moore

Center for Marine Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093 USA

Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093 USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 August 2018
Citations: 201

Graphical Abstract

Fantastic four: Generally, enzymes are highly selective catalysts for single reactions. However, some enzymes instead control a series of reactions in a cascade-like fashion. This Review highlights four types of enzymatic cascade strategies, mediated by nucleophilic, electrophilic, pericyclic, and radical-based reactions, observed in the biosynthesis of complex natural products

Abstract

Enzyme-mediated cascade reactions are widespread in biosynthesis. To facilitate comparison with the mechanistic categorizations of cascade reactions by synthetic chemists and delineate the common underlying chemistry, we discuss four types of enzymatic cascade reactions: those involving nucleophilic, electrophilic, pericyclic, and radical reactions. Two subtypes of enzymes that generate radical cascades exist at opposite ends of the oxygen abundance spectrum. Iron-based enzymes use O2 to generate high valent iron-oxo species to homolyze unactivated C−H bonds in substrates to initiate skeletal rearrangements. At anaerobic end, enzymes reversibly cleave S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to generate the 5′-deoxyadenosyl radical as a powerful oxidant to initiate C−H bond homolysis in bound substrates. The latter enzymes are termed radical SAM enzymes. We categorize the former as “thwarted oxygenases”.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.