The Conservation of Orbital Symmetry†
Corresponding Author
Prof. R. B. Woodward
Department of Chemistry, Harvard University, 12 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 (USA)
R. B. Woodward, Department of Chemistry, Harvard University, 12 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 (USA)
Roald Hoffmann, Department of Chemistry, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850 (USA)
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Prof. Roald Hoffmann
Department of Chemistry, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850 (USA)
R. B. Woodward, Department of Chemistry, Harvard University, 12 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 (USA)
Roald Hoffmann, Department of Chemistry, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850 (USA)
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Prof. R. B. Woodward
Department of Chemistry, Harvard University, 12 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 (USA)
R. B. Woodward, Department of Chemistry, Harvard University, 12 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 (USA)
Roald Hoffmann, Department of Chemistry, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850 (USA)
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Prof. Roald Hoffmann
Department of Chemistry, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850 (USA)
R. B. Woodward, Department of Chemistry, Harvard University, 12 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 (USA)
Roald Hoffmann, Department of Chemistry, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850 (USA)
Search for more papers by this authorThis memoir will also be published as a separate brochure, copies of which can be ordered from Verlag Chemie GmbH, D-694 Weinheim, Postfach 129/149 (Germany), Academic Press Inc., 111 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10003 (USA), or Academic Press Inc. Ltd., Berkeley Square House, Berkeley Square, London W. 1 (England), at a price of ca. DM 16.– or $ 4.40. A German version is also available from Verlag Chemie GmbH.

References
- 1 R. B. Woodward and Roald Hoffmann, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 87, 395 (1965).
- 2 Roald Hoffmann and R. B. Woodward, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 87, 2046 (1965).
- 3 R. B. Woodward and Roald Hoffmann, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 87, 2511 (1965).
- 4 R. B. Woodward: Aromaticity. Special Publication No. 21. The Chemical Society, London 1967, p. 217.
- 5In addition to the classical text by
C. A. Coulson
( Valence. 2nd ed.,
Oxford University Press, London
1961),
we recommend:
C. A. Coulson and
E. T. Stewart in
S. Patai:
The Chemistry of Alkenes.
Wiley-Interscience, New York
1964,
E. Heilbronner and
H. Bock:
Das HMO-Modell und seine Anwendung.
Verlag Chemie, Weinheim
1968,
and
R. S. Mulliken,
Science
157, 13
(1967);
Angew. Chem.
79, 541
(1967).
10.1002/ange.19670791202 Google Scholar
- 6Throughout this paper molecular orbitals are symbolized in terms of the atomic orbitals whose interaction gives the actual molecular orbital; since we are in general interested only in nodal properties, we ignore the fact that the coefficients – and thus the relative sizes – of the resultant atomic orbital contributions are not all identical.
- 7The electronic structure of polyenes is perhaps the most highly developed branch of semi-empirical molecular orbital theory. A very good survey of the field is given in L. Salem: The Molecular Orbital Theory of Conjugated Systems. Benjamin, New York 1966. See also A. Streitwieser: Molecular Orbital Theory for Organic Chemists. Wiley, New York 1961.
- 8 F. Hund, Z. Phys. 40, 742 (1927); Z. Phys. 42, 93 (1927); Z. Phys. 51, 759 (1928); R. S. Mulliken, Phys. Rev. 32, 186 (1928); Rev. Mod. Phys. 4, 1 (1932). See also G. Herzberg: The Electronic Structure of Diatomic Molecules. 2nd edition, Van Nostrand, Princeton 1950.
- 9We could, of course, label the levels with their proper symmetry designations, appropriate to the D2h symmetry of the approach. We deliberately use the symmetric (S) and antisymmetric (A) labels since the nodal properties of the orbitals are then most clearly discernible.
- 10The rule follows directly from perturbation theory and the correlation of higher energy with increasing number of nodes in a wave function.
- 11A similar situation arises in other areas of chemistry. The n→π* transition in formaldehyde is electric-dipole forbidden. The source of the small intensity observed is still disputed. In the cases of acetaldehyde, or of unsymmetrically substituted ketones, the symmetry element which made the formaldehyde transition electric-dipole forbidden is removed. The transition becomes allowed. Does it therefore jump to a high intensity? Not at all; the intensity remains practically unchanged. This is because the essential symmetry, that of the local environment of the carbonyl group, is unchanged.
- 12 K. Fukui, T. Yonezawa, and H. Shingu, J. chem. Physics 20, 722 (1952); K. Fukui, T. Yonezawa, C. Nagata, and H. Shingu, J. chem. Physics 22, 1433 (1954); K. Fukui in O. Sinanoǧlu: Modern Quantum Chemistry. Academic Press, New York 1965, Vol. 1, p. 49, and references therein.
- 13 R. E. K. Winter, Tetrahedron Letters 1965, 1207.
- 14 E. Vogel, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 615, 14 (1958); R. Criegee and K. Noll, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 627, 1 (1959).
- 15 R. Criegee, D. Seebach, R. E. Winter, B. Börretzen, and H.-A. Brune, Chem. Ber. 98, 2339 (1965) and references therein; G. R. Branton, H. M. Frey, and R. F. Skinner, Trans. Faraday Soc. 62, 1546 (1966) and references therein. H. M. Frey and R. Walsh, Chem. Rev. 69, 103 (1969).
- 16 R. Criegee and G. Bolz, unpublished work; D. Seebach, personal communication. The value for n = 1 is estimated from J. I. Brauman, L. E. Ellis, and A E. E. van Tamelen, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 846 (1966). A more detailed study of the case (58), n = 4, has been reported recently: J. J. Bloomfield, J. S. McConaghy, jr., and A. G. Hortmann, Tetrahedron Letters, 1969, 3723.
- 17 R. Criegee and H. G. Reinhardt, Chem. Ber. 101, 102 (1968).
- 18Indications of a similar preference in laterally fused nine-membered rings had been found earlier: K. G. Untch and D. J. Martin, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 87, 4501 (1965).
- 19 G. A. Doorakian and H. H. Freedman, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 5310, 6896 (1968).
- 20 R. Huisgen and H. Seidel, Tetrahedron Letters 1964, 3381; G. Quinkert, K. Opitz, W. W. Wiersdorff, and M. Finke, Tetrahedron Letters 1965, 3009.
- 21 E. J. Corey and J. Streith, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 86, 950 (1964).
- 22 L. A. Paquette, J. H. Barrett, R. P. Spitz, and R. Pitcher, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 87, 3417 (1965).
- 23 W. G. Dauben, R. G. Cargill, R. M. Coates, and J. Saltiel, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 2742 (1966); K. J. Crowley, Tetrahedron 21, 1001 (1965).
- 24 R. Srinivasan, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 4498 (1968).
- 25 W. J. Theuer and J. A. Moore, Chem. Commun. 1965, 468.
- 26 E. Havinga, R. J. de Kock, and M. P. Rappold, Tetrahedron 11, 278 (1960); E. Havinga and J. L. M. A. Schlattmann, Tetrahedron 16, 146 (1961); G. M. Sanders and E. Havinga, Rec. Trav. chim. 83, 665 (1964); H. H. Inhoffen and K. Irmscher, Fortschr. Chem. org. Naturstoffe 17, 70 (1959); H. H. Inhoffen, Angew. Chem. 72, 875 (1960); B. Lythgoe, Proc. chem. Soc. 1959, 141; W. G. Dauben and G. J. Fonken, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 81, 4060 (1959).
- 27 P. Courtot and R. Rumin, Tetrahedron Letters 1968, 1091.
- 28 K. A. Muszkat and E. Fisher, J. chem. Soc. B, 1967, 662; F. B. Mallory, C. S. Wood, and J. T. Gordon, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 86, 3094 (1964). The subject has been recently reviewed by M. Scholz, F. Dietz, and M. Möhlstadt, Z. Chem. 7, 329 (1967).
- 29 E. Vogel, W. Grimme, and E. Dinné, Tetrahedron Letters 1965, 391; E. N. Marvell, G. Caple, and B. Schatz, Tetrahedron Letters 1965, 385; D. S. Glass, J. W. H. Watthey, and S. Winstein, Tetrahedron Letters 1965, 377.
- 30 R. Huisgen, A. Dahmen, and H. Huber, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 7130 (1967); cf. also E. N. Marvell and J. Seubert, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 3377 (1967).
- 31 H. Meister, Chem. Ber. 96, 1688 (1963).
- 32 N. M. Weinshenker and F. D. Greene, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 506 (1968).
- 33 K. Ziegler and K. Hafner, Angew. Chem. 67, 301 (1955); K. Hafner, Angew. Chem. 67, 301 (1955).
- 34(a) P. S. Skell and S. R. Sandler, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 80, 2024 (1958); (b) E. E. Schweizer and W. E. Parham, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 82, 4085 (1960); (c) R. Pettit, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 82, 1972 (1960).
- 35 S. F. Cristol, R. M. Segueira, and C. H. DePuy, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 87, 4007 (1965). Similar results were communicated to us by W. Kirmse. Cf. also the behavior on pyrolysis of the closely related chlorobicyclo[3.1.0]hexanes: M. S. Baird and C. B. Reese, Tetrahedron Letters 1967, 1379.
- 36
P. v. R. Schleyer,
G. W. Van Dine,
U. Schöllkopf, and
J. Paust,
J. Amer. chem. Soc.
88, 2868
(1966);
U. Schöllkopf,
Angew. Chem.
80, 603
(1968);
10.1002/ange.19680801506 Google ScholarAngew. Chem. internat. Edit. 7, 588 (1968).
- 37 L. Ghosez, G. Slinckx, M. Glineur, P. Hoet, and P. Laroche, Tetrahedron Letters 1967, 2773. Related reactions with HCCl and HCBr are also observed: C. W. Jefford, E. Huang Yen, and R. Medary, Tetrahedron Letters 1966, 6317.
- 38 G. H. Whitham and M. Wright, Chem. Commun. 1967, 294.
- 39 R. Huisgen, W. Scheer, and H. Huber, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 1753 (1967).
- 40 N. C. Deno, C. V. Pittman, jr., and J. O. Turner, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 87, 2153 (1965); T. S. Sorensen, Canad. J. Chem. 42, 2768 (1964); Canad. J. Chem. 43, 2744 (1965); Canad. J. Chem. J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 3782, 3794 (1967).
- 41 I. N. Nazarov and I. I. Zaretskaya, Zh. Obsh. Khim. 27, 693 (1957) and references therein.
- 42 R. Lehr, D. Kurland, and R. B. Woodward, unpublished observations. Cf. Dorothy Kurland, Dissertation, Harvard (1967); Roland Lehr, Dissertation, Harvard (1968).
- 43 R. A. W. Johnstone and S. D. Ward, J. chem. Soc. C, 1968, 1805. However, cf. M. J. Bishop and I. Fleming, J. chem. Soc. C, 1969, 1712.
- 44 O. L. Chapman and G. L. Eian, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 5329 (1968).
- 44a R. B. Bates and D. A. McCombs, Tetrahedron Letters 1969, 977.
- 45 R. Rieke, M. Ogliaruso, R. McClung, and S. Winstein, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 84, 4729 (1966); cf. also T. J. Katz and C. Talcott, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 4732 (1966).
- 46 G. Moshuk, G. Petrowski, and S. Winstein, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 2179 (1968).
- 47 G. J. Fonken, personal communication; K. M. Schumate and G. J. Fonken, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 87, 3996 (1965); J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 1073 (1966).
- 48 P. Radlick and W. Fenical, Tetrahedron Letters 1967, 4901.
- 49 S. Masamune, C. G. Chin, K. Hojo, and R. T. Seidner, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 4804 (1967).
- 50
E. E. van Tamelen and
T. L. Burkoth,
J. Amer. chem. Soc.
89, 151
(1967).
Related cases were studied by
R. C. Cookson,
J. Hudec, and
J. Marsden,
Chem. Ind.
1961, 21,
and by
E. Vogel,
W. Meckel, and
W. Grimme,
Angew. Chem.
76, 786
(1964);
Angew. Chem. internat. Edit.
3, 643
(1964).
10.1002/anie.196406431 Google Scholar
- 50a S. Masamune and R. T. Seidner, Chem. Commun. 1969, 542.
- 51 W. D. Huntsman and H. J. Wristers, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 342 (1967).
- 52
G. Schröder,
W. Martin, and
J. F. M. Oth,
Angew. Chem.
79, 861
(1967);
10.1002/ange.19670791909 Google ScholarAngew. Chem. internat. Edit. 6, 870 (1967).
- 53 M. Avram, D. Dinu, G. Mateescu, and C. D. Nenitzescu, Chem. Ber. 93, 1789 (1960).
- 54 W. Merk and R. Pettit, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 4788 (1967).
- 55 F. D. Mango and J. H. Schachtschneider, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 2484 (1967); H. Hogeveen and H. C. Volger, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 2486 (1967).
- 56
E. Vogel,
H. Kiefer, and
W. R. Roth,
Angew. Chem.
76, 432
(1964);
10.1002/ange.19640761008 Google ScholarAngew. Chem. internat. Edit. 3, 442 (1964); R. Huisgen and F. Mietzsch, Angew. Chem. 76, 36 (1964); Angew. Chem. internat. Edit. 3, 83 (1964).
- 57 F. A. L. Anet, A. J. R. Bourn, and Y. S. Lin, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 86, 3576 (1964).
- 58 The terms suprafacial and antarafacial were first used in our discussion of sigmatropic reactions; cf. ref. [3].
- 59 We [Accounts of Chem. Res. 1, 17 (1968)] and others have earlier used cis and trans to designate the geometrical relationships here denominated supra and antara. However, the use of cis and trans as nomenclatural qualifiers is firmly established, and their employment in different senses – often of necessity, simultaneously – can be cumbersome and confusing, especially in discussing multicomponent combinations.
- 60 R. N. Warrener and J. B. Bremner, Rev. pure appl. Chem. 16, 117 (1966). See also W. L. Dilling, Chem. Rev. 66, 373 (1966).
- 61 E. J. Corey, J. D. Bass, R. LeMahieu, and R. B. Mitra, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 86, 5570 (1964); P. E. Eaton and K. Lin, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 86, 2087 (1964); A. Cox, P. de Mayo, and R. W. Yip, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 1043 (1966); R. Robson, P. W. Grubb, and J. A. Barltrop, J. chem. Soc. 1964, 2153.
- 61a H. Yamazaki and R. J. Cvetanović, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 91, 520 (1969).
- 61b J. Saltiel and L.-S. Ng Lim, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 91, 5404 (1969).
- 62 S. W. Benson and P. S. Nangia, J. chem. Physics 38, 18 (1963); see also the review by H. M. Frey in V. Gold: Advances in Physical Organic Chemistry. Academic Press, New York 1966, Vol. 4, p. 170.
- 63 H. R. Gerberich and W. D. Walters, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 83, 3935, 4884 (1961).
- 64 K. Kraft and G. Koltzenburg, Tetrahedron Letters, 1967, 4357, 4723.
- 65 K. Ziegler, H. Sauer, L. Bruns, H. Froitzheim-Kühlhorn, and J. Schneider, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 589, 122 (1954); K. Ziegler and H. Wilms, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 567, 1 (1950); A. C. Cope, C. F. Howell, and A. Knowles, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 84, 3190 (1962).
- 66 W. G. Dauben and W. T. Wipke, Pure appl. Chem. 9, 539 (1964), and references therein.
- 67 R. Srinivasan, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 85, 4045 (1963).
- 68 H. M. Frey and I. D. R. Stevens, Trans. Faraday Soc. 61, 90 (1965).
- 69 R. Srinivasan, A. A. Levi, and I. Haller, J. phys. Chem. 69, 1775 (1965).
- 70Similar conclusions have been reached by Wiberg on the basis of semi-empirical MO calculations [ K. B. Wiberg, Tetrahedron 24, 1083 (1968)].
- 71 K. B. Wiberg and G. Szeimies, Tetrahedron Letters, 1968, 1235.
- 72 G. L. Closs and P. E. Pfeffer, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 2452 (1968).
- 73 R. B. Turner, P. Goebel, W. von E. Doering, and J. F. Coburn, jr., Tetrahedron Letters 1965, 997.
- 74 R. Huisgen, R. Grashey, and J. Sauer in S. Patai: The Chemistry of Alkenes. Interscience, New York 1964, p. 739.
- 75 A. Wassermann: The Diels-Alder Reaction. Elsevier, Amsterdam 1965.
- 76Most recently by S. W. Benson, J. chem. Physics 46, 4920 (1967).
- 77 R. B. Woodward and T. J. Katz, Tetrahedron 5, 70 (1959).
- 78For example, G. S. Hammond, N. J. Turro, and R. S. H. Liu, J. org. Chem. 28, 3297 (1963); G. S. Hammond and R. S. H. Liu, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 85, 477 (1963); D. Valentine, N. J. Turro, and G. S. Hammond, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 86, 5202 (1964); R. S. H. Liu, N. J. Turro, and G. S. Hammond, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 87, 3406 (1965); G. O. Schenck, S.-P. Mannsfeld, G. Schomburg, and C. H. Krauch, Z. Naturforsch. 19b, 18 (1964).
- 79
J. Meinwald and
P. H. Mazzocchi,
J. Amer. chem. Soc.
88, 2850
(1966);
J. Meinwald,
A. Eckell, and
K. L. Erickson,
J. Amer. chem. Soc.
87, 3532
(1965);
H. Prinzbach and
H. Hagemann,
Angew. Chem.
76, 600
(1964);
10.1002/ange.196407613110 Google ScholarAngew. Chem. internat. Edit. 3, 653 (1964); H. Prinzbach and E. Druckrey, Tetrahedron Letters 1965, 2959; K. J. Crowley, Tetrahedron Letters 1965, 2863.
- 80 W. G. Dauben, personal communication; W. G. Dauben, I. Bell, T. W. Hutton, G. F. Laws, A. Rheiner, and H. Urscheler, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 80, 4116 (1958).
- 81 W. G. Dauben and P. Baumann, Tetrahedron Letters 1961, 565; C. P. Saunderson and D. C. Hodgkin, Tetrahedron Letters 1961, 573.
- 82 R. F. Childs, R. Grigg, and A. W. Johnson, J. chem. Soc. C, 1967, 201.
- 83
R. Criegee and
R. Askani,
Angew. Chem.
80, 531
(1968);
10.1002/ange.19680801304 Google ScholarAngew. Chem. internat. Edit. 7, 537 (1968).
- 84 G. F. Emerson, L. Watts, and R. Pettit, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 87, 131 (1965); W. Merk and R. Pettit, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 4787 (1967).
- 84aHere and in the sequel we use the device of placing a negative sign before the bracket whenever a reaction is characterized in terms of its products.
- 85 H. R. Nace, personal communication.
- 86 L. A. Paquette and G. Slomp, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 85, 765 (1963); P. de Mayo and R. W. Yip, Proc. chem. Soc. 1964, 84; D. E. Applequist and R. Searle, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 86, 1389 (1964); J. S. Bradshaw and G. S. Hammond, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 85, 3953 (1963); K. Kraft and G. Koltzenburg, Tetrahedron Letters 1967, 4357.
- 87
W. von
E. Doering and
D. W. Wiley,
Tetrahedron
11, 183
(1960).
10.1016/0040-4020(60)80069-5 Google Scholar
- 88 H. Prinzbach, D. Seip, and G. Englert, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 698, 57 (1966); H. Prinzbach, D. Seip, L. Knothe, and W. Faisst, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 698, 34 (1966).
- 89 E. Le Goff, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 84, 3975 (1962).
- 90 A. Galbraith, T. Small, R. A. Barnes, and V. Boekelheide, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 83, 453 (1961); V. Boekelheide and N. A. Fedoruk, Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. 55, 1385 (1966).
- 91 K. Houk, Dissertation, Harvard (1968).
- 92 R. C. Cookson, B. V. Drake, J. Hudec, and A. Morrison, Chem. Commun. 1966, 15; S. Itǒ, Y. Fujise, T. Okuda, and Y. Inoue, Bull. chem. Soc. Japan 39, 135 (1966).
- 93 T. Nozoe, T. Mukai, K. Takase, and T. Takase, Proc. Japan Acad. 28, 477 (1952).
- 94 S. Itǒ, Y. Fujise, and M. C. Woods, Tetrahedron Letters 1967, 1059.
- 95 L. A. Paquette and J. H. Barrett, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 2590 (1966).
- 96 H. E. Winberg, F. S. Fawcett, W. E. Mochel, and C. W. Theobald, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 82, 1428 (1960); D. J. Cram, C. S. Montgomery, and G. R. Knox, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 515 (1966); D. J. Cram, C. K. Dalton, and G. R. Knox, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 85, 1088 (1963); D. T. Longone and F.-P. Boettcher, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 85, 3436 (1963).
- 97 T. Mukai, T. Tezuka, and Y. Akasaki, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 5025 (1966).
- 98 A. S. Kende and J. E. Lancaster, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 5283 (1967).
- 99 W. von E. Doering, personal communication.
- 100 R. C. Cookson, M. J. Nye, and G. Subrahmanyam, J. chem. Soc. C, 1967, 473; J. chem. Soc. C, 1965, 2009; A. W. Fort, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 84, 2620, 2625, 4979 (1964); N. J. Turro and W. B. Hammond, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 87, 3258 (1965); J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 3672 (1966); W. B. Hammond and N. J. Turro, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 7880 (1966).
- 101 H. M. R. Hoffmann, D. R. Joy, and A. K. Suter, J. chem. Soc. B, 1968, 57.
- 102 F. Walls, J. Padilla, P. Joseph-Nathan, F. Giral, and J. Romo, Tetrahedron Letters 1965, 1577.
- 103 R. Huisgen, Angew. Chem. 75, 604 (1963); Angew. Chem. internat. Edit. 2, 565 (1963); R. Huisgen, R. Grashey, and J. Sauer, in S. Patai: The Chemistry of Alkenes. Interscience, New York 1964, p. 739; R. Huisgen, Helv. chim. Acta 50, 2421 (1967).
- 104 A. Eckell, R. Huisgen, R. Sustmann, G. Wallbillich, D. Grashey, and E. Spindler, Chem. Ber. 100, 2192 (1967).
- 105(a) Two recent reviews serve as excellent guides to the elegant structural work accomplished. K. Schaffner, Advances in Photochemistry 4, 81 (1966); (b) P. J. Kropp, Organic Photochemistry 1, 1 (1967).
- 106 D. H. R. Barton, J. McGhie, and R. Rosenberger, J. chem. Soc. 1961, 1215; D. H. R. Barton, P. de Mayo, and M. Shafiq, J. chem. Soc. 1958, 140, 3314; D. Arigoni, H. Bosshard, H. Bruderer, G. Büchi, O. Jeger, and L. J. Krebaum, Helv. chim. Acta 40, 1732 (1957) and other papers referred to in ref. [105].
- 107 W. W. Kwie, B. A. Shoulders, and P. D. Gardner, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 84, 2268 (1962); O. L. Chapman, T. A. Rettig, A. A. Griswold, A. I. Dutton, and P. Fitton, Tetrahedron Letters 1963, 2049; B. Nann, D. Gravel, R. Schorta, H. Wehrli, K. Schaffner, and O. Jeger, Helv. chim. Acta 46, 2473 (1963) and other papers referred to in ref. [105].
- 108 B. Nann, D. Gravel, R. Schorta, H. Wehrli, K. Schaffner, and O. Jeger, Helv. chim. Acta 46, 2473 (1963); B. Nann, H. Wehrli, K. Schaffner, and O. Jeger, Helv. chim. Acta 48, 1680 (1965).
- 109 H. E. Zimmerman, R. G. Lewis, J. J. McCullough, A. Padwa, S. Staley, and M. Semmelhack, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 159 (1966); O. L. Chapman, J. B. Sieja, and W. J. Welstead, jr., J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 161 (1966).
- 110
H. E. Zimmerman,
Advances in Photochemistry
1, 183
(1963);
10.1002/9780470133316.ch6 Google ScholarO. L. Chapman, Advances in Photochemistry 1, 323 (1963).10.1002/9780470133316.ch9 Google Scholar
- 111
H. E. Zimmerman,
17th National Organic Symposium of the American Chemical Society, Bloomington, Indiana, 1960, Abstracts, p. 31;
H. E. Zimmerman and
D. I. Schuster,
J. Amer. chem. Soc.
83, 4486
(1961);
J. Amer. chem. Soc.
84, 4527
(1962);
H. E. Zimmerman,
Tetrahedron
19, Supplement 2, 393
(1963).
10.1016/S0040-4020(63)80028-9 Google Scholar
- 112 D. H. R. Barton, P. de Mayo, and M. Shafiq, J. chem. Soc. 1958, 140; D. Arigoni, M. Bosshard, H. Bruderer, G. Büchi, O. Jeger, and L. J. Krebaum, Helv. chim. Acta 40, 1732 (1957); W. Cocker, K. Crowley, J. T. Edward, T. B. H. McMurry, and E. R. Stuart, J. chem. Soc. 1957, 3416; D. H. R. Barton and P. T. Gilham, J. chem. Soc. 1960, 4596.
- 113Only the consequences of an addition on the double bond next to R are sketched. Of course the addition on the opposite side is feasible, and will double the number of possible products.
- 114 D. I. Schuster, personal communication.
- 115 H. Dutler, M. Bosshard, and O. Jeger, Helv. chim. Acta 40, 494 (1957); K. Weinberg, E. C. Utzinger, D. Arigoni, and O. Jeger, Helv. chim. Acta 43, 236 (1960); H. Dutler, C. Ganter, H. Ryf, E. C. Utzinger, K. Weinberg, K. Schaffner, D. Arigoni, and O. Jeger, Helv. chim. Acta 45, 2346 (1962); C. Ganter, F. Greuter, D. Kägi, K. Schaffner, and O. Jeger, Helv. chim. Acta 47, 627 (1964); F. Frei, C. Ganter, D. Kägi, K. Kocsis, M. Miljković, A. Siewinski, R. Wenger, K. Schaffner, and O. Jeger, Helv. chim. Acta 49, 1049 (1966).
- 116 O. L. Chapman, J. B. Sieja, and W. J. Welstead, jr., J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 161 (1966).
- 117 D. Belluš, D. R. Kearns, and K. Schaffner, Helv. chim. Acta 52, 971 (1969).
- 118 J. R. Williams and H. Ziffer, Chem. Commun. 1967, 194, 469; Tetrahedron 24, 6725 (1968).
- 119 L. A. Paquette, R. F. Eizember, and O. Cox, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 5153 (1968).
- 120 G. W. Griffin, J. Covell, R. C. Petterson, R. M. Dodson, and G. Klose, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 87, 1410 (1965); H. Kristinsson and G. W. Griffin, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 378 (1966).
- 121 H. E. Zimmerman and K. G. Hancock, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 3749 (1968). See also H. E. Zimmerman and R. L. Morse, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 954 (1968).
- 122 E. Pfenninger, D. E. Poel, C. Berse, H. Wehrli, K. Schaffner, and O. Jeger, Helv. chim. Acta 51, 772 (1968).
- 123 R. R. Sauers and A. Shurpik, J. org. Chem. 33, 799 (1968).
- 124 W. R. Roth and B. Peltzer, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 685, 56 (1965).
- 125 J. R. Edman, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 3454 (1966).
- 126 E. Ciganek, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 2882 (1966).
- 127 H. E. Zimmerman, R. S. Givens, and R. M. Pagni, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 4192 (1968). See also J. P. N. Brewer and H. Heaney, Chem. Commun. 1967, 811; P. W. Rabideau, J. B. Hamilton, and L. Friedman, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 4465 (1968).
- 128 H. E. Zimmerman, R. W. Binkley, R. S. Givens, and M. A. Sherwin, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 3932 (1967).
- 128aSince the above was written, this prediction has received elegant experimental confirmation: J. A. Berson and S. S. Olin, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 91, 777 (1969).
- 129Inter alia: A. T. Blomquist and Y. C. Meinwald, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 81, 667 (1959); R. C. Cookson, S. S. H. Gilani, and I. D. R. Stevens, Tetrahedron Letters 1962, 615; H. K. Hall, J. org. Chem. 25, 42 (1960).
- 130 J. K. Williams and R. E. Benson, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 84, 1257 (1962).
- 131 H. A. Staab, F. Graf, and B. Junge, Tetrahedron Letters, 1966, 743.
- 132
C. D. Smith,
J. Amer. chem. Soc.
88, 4273
(1966).
Cf. also
H. Prinzbach,
Pure appl. Chem.
16, 24
(1968);
10.1351/pac196816010017 Google ScholarH. Prinzbach and J. Rivier, Angew. Chem. 79, 1102, (1967);10.1002/ange.19670792407 Google ScholarAngew. Chem. internat. Edit. 6, 1069 (1967).
- 133
J. F. M. Oth,
Angew. Chem.
80, 633
(1968);
10.1002/ange.19680801538 Google ScholarAngew. Chem. internat. Edit. 7, 646 (1968); Rec. Trav. chim. Pays-Bas 87, 1185 (1968).
- 134 H. Prinzbach and J. Rivier, Tetrahedron Letters 1967, 3713.
- 135
H. Prinzbach,
M. Arguëlles, and
E. Druckrey,
Angew. Chem.
78, 1057
(1966);
10.1002/ange.19660782304 Google ScholarAngew. Chem. internat. Edit. 5, 1039 (1966).
- 136 H. Prinzbach, P. Vogel, and W. Auge, Chimia 21, 469 (1967).
- 137 C. Steel, R. Zand, P. Hurwitz, and S. G. Cohen, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 86, 679 (1964).
- 138 R. Askani, Chem. Ber. 98, 3618 (1965).
- 139 M. Takahashi, Y. Kitahara, I. Murata, T. Nitta, and M. C. Woods, Tetrahedron Letters 1968, 3387.
- 140 H. C. Longuet-Higgins in: Theoretical Organic Chemistry. The Kekulé Symposium. Butterworths, London 1959, p. 17.
- 141For example, [1−14C]-propylene does not rearrange to [3−14C]-propylene: B. Sublett and N. S. Bowman, J. org. Chem. 26, 2594 (1961).
- 142 J. A. Berson and G. L. Nelson, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 5303 (1967); J. A. Berson, Accounts Chem. Res. 1, 152 (1968).
- 143 W. J. Bailey and R. A. Baylouny, J. org. Chem. 27, 3476 (1962).
- 144 W. von E. Doering, personal communication; cf. E. F. Ullman, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 82, 505 (1960).
- 145 C. G. Overberger and A. E. Borchert, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 82, 1007 (1960).
- 146 M. C. Flowers and H. M. Frey, J. chem. Soc. 1961, 3547, R. J. Ellis and H. M. Frey, J. chem. Soc. 1964, 959, 4188; C. J. Elliot and H. M. Frey, J. chem. Soc. 1965, 345; J. chem. Soc. A, 1966, 553; C. A. Wellington, J. physic. Chem. 66, 1671 (1962); H. M. Frey and D. C. Marshall, J. chem. Soc. 1962, 3981; G. R. Branton and H. M. Frey, J. chem. Soc. 1966, 1342.
- 147 B. S. Rabinowitch, E. W. Schlag, and K. B. Wiberg, J. chem. Physics 28, 504 (1958); B. S. Rabinowitch and E. W. Schlag, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 86, 5996 (1960).
- 148 K. W. Egger, D. M. Golden, and S. W. Benson, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 86, 5420 (1964).
- 149 M. R. Willcott and V. M. Cargle, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 723 (1967); W. R. Roth, personal communication.
- 150 W. G. Dauben and W. T. Wipke, Pure appl. Chem. 9, 539 (1964). J. J. Hurst and G. M. Whitham, J. chem. Soc. 1960, 2864; R. C. Cookson, V. N. Gogte, J. Hudec, and N. A. Mirza, Tetrahedron Letters 1965, 3955; W. F. Erman and H. C. Kretschmar, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 3842 (1967); R. F. C. Brown, R. C. Cookson, and J. Hudec, Tetrahedron 24, 3955 (1968); R. C. Cookson, Chemistry in Britain 5, 6 (1960); E. Baggiolini, H. P. Hamlow, K. Schaffner, and O. Jeger, Chimia 23, 181 (1969).
- 151References to the literature may be found in D. S. Glass, R. S. Boikess, and S. Winstein, Tetrahedron Letters 1966, 999. An interesting recently discovered [1,5] shift of a methyl group is described by R. Grigg, A. W. Johnson, K. Richardson, and K. W. Shelton, Chem. Commun. 1967, 1192; cf. also V. Boekelheide and E. Sturm, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 91, 902 (1969).
- 152 W. R. Roth and J. König, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 699, 24 (1966). See also H. Kloosterziel and A. P. ter Borg, Rec. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 84, 1305 (1965).
- 153 W. R. Roth and J. König, personal communication.
- 154 V. A. Mironov, E. V. Sobolev, and A. N. Elizarova, Tetrahedron 19, 1939 (1963); S. McLean and R. Haynes, Tetrahedron Letters 1964, 2385.
- 155 W. R. Roth, Tetrahedron Letters 1964, 1009.
- 156
A. P. ter Borg,
H. Kloosterziel, and
N. van Meurs,
Rec. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas
82, 717, 741, 1189
(1963);
10.1002/recl.19630820712 Google ScholarE. Weth and A. S. Dreiding, Proc. chem. Soc. 1964, 59; K. W. Egger, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 3688 (1967).
- 157 G. Bergsson and A. Weidler, Acta chem. scand. 17, 1798 (1963); A. Weidler, Acta chem. scand. 17, 2724 (1963); A. Weidler and G. Bergsson, Acta chem. scand. 18, 1484, 1487 (1964); J. Almy, R. T. Uyeda, and D. J. Cram, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 6768 (1967), and references therein.
- 158 W. R. Roth, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 671, 25 (1964).
- 159For example: R. Srinivasan, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 84, 3982 (1962); K. J. Crowley, Proc. chem. Soc. 1964, 17; H. Prinzbach and E. Druckrey, Tetrahedron Letters 1964, 2959.
- 160 E. F. Zwicker, L. I. Grossweiner, and N. C. Yang, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 85, 2671 (1963); G. Wettermark, Photochem. Photobiol. 4, 621 (1965); K. R. Huffman, M. Loy, and E. F. Ullman, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 87, 5417 (1965); G. Büchi and N. C. Yang, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 79, 2318 (1957).
- 161 J. A. Berson and M. R. Willcott, III, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 87, 2751, 2752 (1965); J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 2494 (1966).
- 162Cf.
W. von E. Doering and
W. R. Roth,
Tetrahedron
18, 67
(1962);
10.1016/0040-4020(62)80025-8 Google ScholarAngew. Chem. 75, 27 (1963); Angew. Chem. internat. Edit. 2, 115 (1963); S. J. Rhoads in P. de Mayo: Molecular Rearrangements. Interscience, New York 1963, Vol. 1, p. 655; A. Jefferson and F. Scheinmann, Quart. Rev. 22, 391 (1968).
- 163 T. Miyashi, M. Nitta, and T. Mukai, Tetrahedron Letters 1967, 3433.
- 164 J. L. M. A. Schlatmann, J. Pot, and E. Havinga, Rec. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 83, 1173 (1964); M. Akhtar and C. J. Gibbons, Tetrahedron Letters 1965, 509.
- 165
A. P. ter Borg and
H. Kloosterziel,
Rec. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas
84, 241
(1965);
W. von
E. Doering and
P. P. Gaspar,
J. Amer. chem. Soc.
85, 3043
(1963);
10.1021/ja00902a051 Google ScholarW. R. Roth, Angew. Chem. 75, 921 (1963); Angew. Chem. internat. Edit. 2, 688 (1963); L. B. Jones and V. K. Jones, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 1540 (1968).
- 166 R. W. Murray and M. L. Kaplan, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 3527 (1966).
- 166a R. Hug, H.-J. Hansen, and H. Schmid, Chimia 23, 108 (1969).
- 167 K. Schmid and H. Schmid, Helv. chim. Acta 36, 687 (1953).
- 168 Gy. Fráter and H. Schmid, Helv. chim. Acta 51, 190 (1968).
- 169Cf. the reviews by Y. Pocker, and by J. A. Berson in P. de Mayo: Molecular Rearrangements. Interscience, New York 1963, Vol. 1.
- 170 D. A. McCaulay and A. P. Lien, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 79, 5953 (1957); H. Steinberg and F. L. J. Sixma, Rec. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 81, 185 (1962); C. MacLean and E. L. Mackor, J. chem. Physics 34, 2208 (1961); V. A. Koptyug, V. G. Shubin, and A. I. Rezvukhin, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR 1965, 201.
- 171 D. W. Swatton and H. Hart, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 5075 (1967).
- 172 T. M. Brennan and R. K. Hill, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 5614 (1968).
- 173 H. E. Zimmerman and D. S. Crumrine, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 5612 (1968).
- 174 H. Hart, T. R. Rodgers, and J. Griffiths, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 91, 754 (1969).
- 175 R. F. Childs and S. Winstein, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 7146 (1968).
- 176 H.-J. Hansen, B. Sutter, and H. Schmid, Helv. chim. Acta 51, 828 (1968).
- 177 Y. Makisumi and S. Notzumoto, Tetrahedron Letters 1967, 6393.
- 178 U. Schöllkopf and K. Fellenberger, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 698, 80 (1966). See also H. E. Zimmerman in P. de Mayo: Molecular Rearrangements. Interscience, New York 1963, Vol. 1, p. 372.
- 179 J. E. Baldwin, R. E. Hackler, and D. P. Kelly, Chem. Commun. 1968, 537, 538; G. M. Blackburn, W. D. Ollis, J. D. Plackett, C. Smith, and I. O. Sutherland, Chem. Commun. 1968, 186; R. B. Bates and D. Feld, Tetrahedron Letters 1968, 417; B. M. Trost and R. La Rochelle, Tetrahedron Letters 1968, 3327; J. E. Baldwin and R. E. Peavy, Tetrahedron Letters 1968, 5029; W. Kirmse and M. Kapps, Chem. Ber. 101, 994, 1004 (1968).
- 180 E. Grovenstein, jr., and G. Wentworth, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 1852, 2348 (1967), and references therein.
- 181 T. S. Stevens, J. chem. Soc. 1930, 2107; R. A. W. Johnstone and T. S. Stevens, J. chem. Soc. 1955, 4487. R. K. Hill and T.-H. Chan, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 866 (1966).
- 182
J. H. Brewster and
M. W. Kline,
J. Amer. chem. Soc.
74, 5179
(1952);
B. J. Millard and
T. S. Stevens,
J. chem. Soc.
1963, 3397;
E. F. Jenny and
J. Druey,
Angew. Chem.
74, 152
(1962);
Angew. Chem. internat. Edit.
1, 155
(1962).
10.1002/anie.196201551 Google Scholar
- 183 D. J. Cram: Fundamentals of Carbanion Chemistry. Academic Press, New York 1965, p. 223; P. T. Lansbury, V. A. Pattison, J. D. Sidler, and J. B. Bieber, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 78 (1966); A. R. Lepley, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 91, 1237 (1969); J. E. Baldwin, personal communication.
- 184 D. S. Glass, J. Zirner, and S. Winstein, Proc. chem. Soc. 1963, 276; R. J. Ellis and H. M. Frey, Proc. chem. Soc. 1964, 221; J. chem. Soc. 1964, Suppl. 1, 5578; W. R. Roth, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 671, 10 (1964); W. R. Roth and J. König, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 688, 28 (1965); W. Grimme, Chem. Ber. 98, 756 (1965); J. K. Crandall and R. J. Watkins, Tetrahedron Letters 1967, 1717; R. M. Roberts, R. G. Landolt, R. N. Greene, and E. W. Heyer, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 1404 (1967); G. Ohloff, Tetrahedron Letters 1965, 3795; W. R. Roth, Chimia 20, 229 (1966). – The reaction is also known in the case of cyclopropyl-carbonyl compounds: D. E. McGreer, N. W. K. Chiu, and R. S. McDaniel, Proc. chem. Soc. 1964, 415. A special case of some interest is the “abnormal Claisen rearrangement” studied by E. N. Marvell, D. R. Anderson, and J. Ong, J. org. Chem. 27, 1109 (1962); W. M. Lauer and T. A. Johnson, J. org. Chem. 28, 2913 (1963); A. Habich, R. Barner, W. von Philipsborn, and H. Schmid, Helv. chim. Acta 48, 1297 (1964); R. M. Roberts and R. G. Landolt, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 87, 2281 (1965); R. M. Roberts, R. N. Greene, R. G. Landolt, and E. W. Heyer, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 87, 2282 (1965); R. M. Roberts, R. G. Landolt, R. N. Greene, and E. W. Heyer, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 1404 (1967). See also J. M. Conia, F. Leyendecker, and C. Dubois-Faget, Tetrahedron Letters 1966, 129; F. Rouessac and J. M. Conia, Tetrahedron Letters 1965, 3313.
- 185Reviewed by S. Hünig, H. R. Müller, and W. Thier, Angew. Chem. 77, 368 (1965); Angew. Chem. internat. Edit. 4, 271 (1965); E. J. Corey, D. J. Pasto, and W. L. Mock, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 83, 2957 (1961).
- 186 W. von E. Doering and J. W. Rosenthal, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 4535 (1967).
- 187 P. Dowd, personal communication; I. Fleming, personal communication.
- 188 C. A. Wellington and W. D. Walters, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 83, 4888 (1961).
- 189 W. Reusch, M. Russell, and C. Dzurella, J. org. Chem. 29, 2446 (1964).
- 190 J. E. Baldwin, Tetrahedron Letters 1966, 2953.
- 191 R. J. Ellis and H. M. Frey, J. chem. Soc. A, 1966, 553.
- 192 S. W. Benson and R. Shaw, Trans. Faraday Soc. 63, 985 (1967); J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 5351 (1967).
- 193 W. D. Walters, personal communication.
- 194 H. M. Frey and D. H. Lister, J. chem. Soc. A, 1967, 509, 1800; H. M. Frey and R. Walsh, Chem. Rev. 69, 103 (1969).
- 195Photolysis of cyclohexadiene: R. Srinivasan, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 83, 2806 (1961); photolysis of ethane and ethylene: M. Okabe and J. R. McNesby, J. chem. Physics 34, 668 (1962); cyclohexane: R. P. Doepker and P. Ausloos, J. chem. Physics 42, 3746 (1965). In the gas phase photolysis of azomethane, it is well established that the predominant primary process is decomposition to nitrogen and two methyl radicals; however, some evidence has been presented for a minor molecular elimination of ethane: R. E. Rebbert and P. Ausloos, J. phys. Chem. 66, 2253 (1962).
- 196This has also been stressed by K. Fukui in P.-O. Löwdin and B. Pullman: Molecular Orbitals in Chemistry, Physics, and Biology. Academic Press, New York 1964, p. 525.
- 197The role of other secondary interactions has been stressed by L. Salem, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 543, 553 (1968).
- 198
K. Alder and
G. Stein,
Angew. Chem.
50, 514
(1937);
10.1002/ange.19370502804 Google ScholarK. Alder, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 571, 157 (1951); K. Alder and M. Schumacher, Fortschr. Chem. org. Naturstoffe 10, 1 (1953). For exceptions to the rule, cf. J. A. Berson, Z. Hamlet, and W. A. Mueller, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 84, 297 (1962).
- 199
A. Wassermann,
J. chem. Soc.
1935, 825, 1511;
J. chem. Soc.
1936, 432;
Trans. Faraday Soc.
35, 841
(1939).
10.1039/tf9393500841 Google Scholar
- 200 R. B. Woodward and H. Baer, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 66, 645 (1944).
- 201 R. C. Cookson, B. V. Drake, J. Hudec, and A. Morrison, Chem. Commun. 1966, 15; K. Houk, Dissertation, Harvard (1968).
- 202 R. C. Cookson, J. Dance, and J. Hudec, J. chem. Soc. 1964, 5416.
- 203 G. Wittig and J. Weinlich, Chem. Ber. 98, 471 (1965).
- 204 R. Criegee, Angew. Chem. 74, 703 (1962); Angew. Chem. internat. Edit. 1, 519 (1962), and references therein: P. S. Skell and R. J. Peterson, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 86, 2530 (1964), and references therein; L. Watts, J. D. Fitzpatrick, and R. Pettit, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 623 (1966); E. Hedaya, R. D. Miller, D. W. McNeil P. F. D'Angelo, and P. Schissel, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 91, 1875 (1969).
- 205
W. von
E. Doering and
W. R. Roth,
Tetrahedron
18, 67
(1962);
10.1016/0040-4020(62)80025-8 Google ScholarAngew. Chem. 75, 27 (1963); Angew. Chem. internat. Edit. 2, 115 (1963); R. K. Hill and N. W. Gilman, Chem. Commun. 1967, 619; for some recent theoretical work see M. Simonetta, G. Favini, C. Mariani, and P. Gramaccioni, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 1280 (1968). Similar preferences in the aromatic Claisen rearrangement have been elegantly studied by Gy. Fráter, A. Habich, H.-J. Hansen, and H. Schmid, Helv. chim. Acta 52, 335 (1969).
- 206 J. M. Brown, Proc. chem. Soc. 1965, 226; W. von E. Doering and W. R. Roth, Tetrahedron 19, 715 (1963); R. Merényi, J. F. M. Oth, and G. Schröder, Chem. Ber. 97, 3150 (1964); H. A. Staab and F. Vögtle, Tetrahedron Letters 1965, 54.
- 206aSince the above was written, the prediction has been confirmed: H. M. R. Hoffmann and D. R. Joy, J. chem. Soc. B 1968, 1182.
- 207 D. M. Lemal and S. D. McGregor, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 1335 (1966).
- 208 J. E. Baldwin, Canad. J. Chem. 44, 2051 (1966).
- 209See, for example, S. Yankelevich and B. Fuchs, Tetrahedron Letters 1967, 4945.
- 210 O. L. Chapman and G. W. Borden, J. org. Chem. 26, 4185 (1961); O. L. Chapman, D. J. Pasto, G. W. Borden, and A. A. Griswold, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 84, 1220 (1962); D. I. Schuster, B. R. Sckolnick, and F.-T. H. Lee, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 1300 (1968).
- 211 L. A. Carpino, Chem. Commun. 1966, 494.
- 212For molecular orbital descriptions of sulfur dioxide and sulfones, see W. Moffitt, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 200, 409 (1950).
- 213 H. Staudinger and B. Ritzenhaler, Ber. dtsch. chem. Ges. 68, 455 (1935); G. Hesse, E. Reichold, and S. Majmudar, Chem. Ber. 90, 2106 (1957); M. P. Cava and A. A. Deana, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 81, 4266 (1959). The last group has also described some interesting selective photochemical eliminations of sulfur dioxide: M. P. Cava, R. H. Schlessinger, and J. P. Van Meter, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 86, 3173 (1964).
- 214 W. L. Mock, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 2857 (1966); S. D. McGregor and D. M. Lemal, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 2858 (1966).
- 215 J. Saltiel and L. Metts, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 2232 (1967).
- 216 W. L. Mock, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 1281 (1967); W. L. Mock, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 91, 5682 (1969).
- 217
P. S. Skell and
R. C. Woodworth,
J. Amer. chem. Soc.
78, 4496
(1956);
J. Amer. chem. Soc.
81, 3383
(1959);
P. S. Skell and
A. Y. Garner,
J. Amer. chem. Soc.
78, 5430
(1956);
W. von E. Doering and
P. LaFlamme,
J. Amer. chem. Soc.
78, 5447
(1956);
10.1021/ja01601a079 Google ScholarH. M. Frey, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 80, 5005 (1958); W. R. Moore, W. R. Moser, and J. E. LaPrade, J. org. Chem. 28, 2200 (1963).
- 218For this reaction, semiempirical calculations yield results in striking concordance with the analysis of non-linear cheletropic processes presented here. Cf. R. Hoffmann, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 1475 (1968).
- 219 R. Breslow, T. Eicher, A. Krebs, R. A. Peterson, and J. Posner, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 87, 1320 (1965); R. Breslow, L. J. Altman, A. Krebs, E. Mohacsi, I. Murata, R. A. Peterson, and J. Posner, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 87, 1326 (1965); R. Breslow and G. Ryan, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 3073 (1967).
- 220 N. J. Turro, P. A. Leermakers, H. R. Wilson, D. C. Neckers, G. W. Byers, and G. F. Vesley, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 87, 2613 (1965).
- 221 D. C. Zecher and R. West, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 153 (1967).
- 222 J. P. Freeman and W. H. Graham, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 89, 1761 (1967). However, the corresponding aryl-substituted case proceeds in a non-stereospecific manner (personal communication from L. A. Carpino).
- 223 N. P. Neureiter and F. G. Bordwell, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 85, 1210 (1963); N. Tokura, T. Nagai, and S. Matsumara, J. org. Chem. 31, 349 (1966); L. A. Carpino and L. V. McAdams III, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 87, 5804 (1965); N. P. Neureiter, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 558 (1966); L. A. Paquette, Accounts Chem. Res. 1, 209 (1968).
- 224 F. G. Bordwell, J. M. Williams, jr., E. B. Hoyt, jr., and B. B. Jarvis, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 429 (1968).
- 225 R. D. Clark and G. K. Helmkamp, J. org. Chem. 29, 1316 (1964).
- 226 C. E. Looney, W. D. Phillips, and E. L. Reilly, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 79, 6136 (1957).
- 227 D. B. Denney and M. J. Boskin, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 82, 4736 (1960).
- 228 D. M. Lemal, E. P. Gosselink, and S. D. McGregor, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 528 (1966).
- 229Cf. H. Staudinger: Die Ketene. Enke, Stuttgart 1912.
- 230 R. Huisgen, L. A. Feiler, and P. Otto, Tetrahedron Letters 1968, 4485.
- 231 W. T. Brady and H. R. O'Neal, J. org. Chem. 32, 612 (1967).
- 232 G. Binsch, L. A. Feiler, and R. Huisgen, Tetrahedron Letters 1968, 4497; J. C. Martin, V. W. Goodlett, and R. D. Burpitt, J. org. Chem. 30, 4309 (1965); R. Huisgen, L. Feiler, and G. Binsch, Angew. Chem. 76, 892 (1964); Angew. Chem. internat. Edit. 3, 753 (1964).
- 233
R. Montaigne and
L. Ghosez,
Angew. Chem.
80, 194
(1968);
10.1002/ange.19680800511 Google ScholarAngew. Chem. internat. Edit. 7, 221 (1968).
- 234 R. Huisgen and P. Otto, Tetrahedron Letters 1968, 4491.
- 235
K. Griesbaum,
W. Naegele, and
G. G. Wanless,
J. Amer. chem. Soc.
87, 3151
(1965);
K. Griesbaum,
Angew. Chem.
78, 953
(1966);
10.1002/ange.19660782102 Google ScholarAngew. Chem. internat. Edit. 5, 933 (1966).
- 236 R. Criegee and A. Moschel, Chem. Ber. 92, 2181 (1959).
- 237 I. V. Smirnov-Zamkov, Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR 83, 869 (1952); I. V. Smirnov-Zamkov and N. A. Kostromina, Ukr. Khim. Zhur. 21, 233 (1953).
- 238 R. Huisgen and P. Otto, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 5342 (1968).
- 239An excellent review is available: J. D. Roberts and C. M. Sharts, Organic Reactions 12, 1 (1962).
- 240 P. D. Bartlett, L. K. Montgomery, and B. Seidel, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 86, 616 (1964); L. K. Montgomery, K. Schueller, and P. D. Bartlett, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 86, 628 (1964); P. D. Bartlett and L. K. Montgomery, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 86, 628 (1964); P. D. Bartlett, Science 159, 833 (1968).
- 241
J. F. M. Oth,
Angew. Chem.
80, 633
(1968);
10.1002/ange.19680801538 Google ScholarAngew. Chem. internat. Edit. 7, 646 (1968); Rec. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas, 87, 1185 (1968); H. C. Volger and H. Hogeveen, Rec. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 86, 830 (1967).
- 242
W. Schäfer,
Angew. Chem.
78, 716
(1966);
10.1002/ange.19660781408 Google ScholarAngew. Chem. internat. Edit. 5, 669 (1966).
- 243 K. Fukui, Tetrahedron Letters 1965, 2009, 2427; Bull. chem. Soc. Japan 39, 498 (1966); K. Fukui and H. Fujimoto, Tetrahedron Letters 1966, 251; Bull. chem. Soc. Japan 39, 2116 (1966); Bull. chem. Soc. Japan 40, 2018 (1967).
- 244 L. Salem, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 543, 553 (1968).
- 245 H. E. Zimmerman, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 88, 1563, 1566 (1966).
- 246 M. J. S. Dewar, Tetrahedron, Suppl. 8, p. 75 (1966); Aromaticity. Special Publication of The Chemical Society No. 21, London 1967, p. 177.
- 247 W. Th. A. M. van der Lugt and L. J. Oosterhoff, Chem. Commun. 1968, 1235.
- 248 H. C. Longuet-Higgins and E. W. Abrahamson, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 87, 2045 (1965).
- 249 K. J. Laidler: The Chemical Kinetics of Excited States. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1955.
- 250 V. Griffing, J. chem. Physics 25, 1015 (1955); J. phys. Chem. 61, 11 (1957).
- 251 K. F. Herzfeld, Z. Naturforschg. 3a, 457 (1948); Rev. mod. Physics 41, 527 (1949).
- 252 R. F. W. Bader, Canad. J. Chem. 40, 1164 (1962). Cf. also R. G. Pearson, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 91, 1252 (1969), and L. Salem, Chem. Phys. Letters 3, 99 (1969).
- 253 L. J. Oosterhoff, quoted in E. Havinga and J. L. M. A. Schlatmann, Tetrahedron 16, 151 (1961).
- 254 Ya. K. Syrkin, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR 1959, 238, 389, 401, 600.
- 255 A. T. Balaban, Rev. Roum. Chimie 11, 1097 (1966); Rev. Roum. Chimie 12, 875 (1967).
- 256 J. Mathieu and J. Valls, Bull. Soc. chim. France 1957, 1509.
- 257Inter alia, J. J. Vollmer and K. L. Servis, J. Chem. Educat. 45, 214 (1968); S. I. Miller in V. Gold. Advances in Physical Organic Chemistry. Academic Press, New York 1968, Vol. 6, p. 185; G. B. Gill, Quart. Rev. 22, 338 (1968); D. Seebach, Fortschr. chem. Forsch. 11, 177 (1969); P. Millie, Bull. Soc. chim. France 1966, 4031; M. Orchin and H. H. Jaffé: The Importance of Antibonding Orbitals. Houghton-Miffln, Boston 1967; E. M. Kosower: An Introduction to Physical Organic Chemistry. Wiley, New York 1968; O. Červinka and O. Kříž, Chem. Listy 61, 1036 (1967); Chem. Listy 62, 321 (1968); J. P. M. Houbiers, Chem. Weekblad 62, 61 (1966); C. Hörig, Z. Chem. 7, 298 (1967); M. J. S. Dewar: The Molecular Orbital Theory of Organic Chemistry. McGraw-Hill, New York 1969.
- 258 K. Fukui in P.-O. Löwdin and B. Pullman: Molecular Orbitals in Chemistry, Physics and Biology. Academic Press, New York 1964, p. 513; K. Fukui in O. Sinanoǧlu: Modern Quantum Chemistry. Academic Press, New York 1965, p. 49.
- 259 R. Hoffmann and W. N. Lipscomb, J. chem. Physics 36, 2179 (1962); J. chem. Physics 37, 2872 (1962); R. Hoffmann, J. chem. Physics 39, 1397 (1963); J. chem. Physics 40, 2474, 2480, 2745 (1964); Tetrahedron 22, 521, 539 (1966).
- 260 D. R. Eaton, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 4272 (1968).
- 261 F. McCapra, Chem. Commun. 1968, 155.
- 262 E. F. Ullman, J. Amer. chem. Soc. 90, 4158 (1968).