Volume 127, Issue 3 pp. 263-266
Research Article
Full Access

Brief communication: Is variation in the cranial capacity of the Dmanisi sample too high to be from a single species?

Sang-Hee Lee

Corresponding Author

Sang-Hee Lee

Department of Anthropology, University of California at Riverside, Riverside, California 92521-0418

Department of Anthropology, University of California at Riverside, 1344 Watkins Hall, Riverside, CA 92521-0418Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 October 2004
Citations: 18

Abstract

This study uses data resampling to test the null hypothesis that the degree of variation in the cranial capacity of the Dmanisi hominid sample is within the range variation of a single species. The statistical significance of the variation in the Dmanisi sample is examined using simulated distributions based on comparative samples of modern humans, chimpanzees, and gorillas. Results show that it is unlikely to find the maximum difference observed in the Dmanisi sample in distributions of female-female pairs from comparative single-species samples. Given that two sexes are represented, the difference in the Dmanisi sample is not enough to reject the null hypothesis of a single species. Results of this study suggest no compelling reason to invoke multiple taxa to explain variation in the cranial capacity of the Dmanisi hominids. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2004. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.