Volume 116, Issue 2 pp. 154-165
Article
Full Access

Craniometric variation and the settlement of the Americas: Testing hypotheses by means of R-matrix and matrix correlation analyses

Rolando González-José

Corresponding Author

Rolando González-José

Unitat d'Antropologia, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, 08027 Barcelona, Spain

Unitat d'Antropologia, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Avinguda Diagonal 645, 08028 Barcelona, SpainSearch for more papers by this author
Silvia L. Dahinten

Silvia L. Dahinten

Centro Nacional Patagónico-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, 9120 Puerto Madryn, Argentina

Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Search for more papers by this author
María A. Luis

María A. Luis

Departamento Científico de Antropología del Museo de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, 1900 La Plata, Argentina

Search for more papers by this author
Miquel Hernández

Miquel Hernández

Unitat d'Antropologia, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, 08027 Barcelona, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Hector M. Pucciarelli

Hector M. Pucciarelli

Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Departamento Científico de Antropología del Museo de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, 1900 La Plata, Argentina

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 October 2001
Citations: 50

Abstract

New archaeological findings and the incorporation of new South American skull samples have raised fundamental questions for the classical theories of the Americas' settlement. The aim of this study was to estimate craniometric variability among several Asian and Native American populations in order to test goodness of fit of the data to different models of ancient population entries and dispersions into the New World. Our data set includes Howells' variables recorded on East Asian, North American, and South American natives (except for Na-Dene speakers). Five Fuego-Patagonian samples and one Paleoamerican sample were also included. A multivariate extension of the R-matrix method for quantitative traits was used to obtain Fst values, which were considered estimations of intergroup variation. Three main models for the peopling of the New World were represented in hypothetical design matrices. Matrix permutation tests were performed to quantify the fit of the observed data with 1) geographical separation of the samples and 2) three ways of settlement, which were the Three Migration Model (TMM), the Single Wave Migration model (SWM), and the Two Components Settlement Model (TCS). R-matrix results showed high levels of heterogeneity among Native Americans. Matrix permutation analyses suggested that the model involving high Amerindian heterogeneity and two different morphological patterns or components (derived “Mongoloid” vs. generalized “non-Mongoloid”) explains better the variation observed, even when the effects of geographical separation are removed. Whether these patterns arose as a result of two separate migration events or by local evolution from Paleoamericans to Amerindians remains unresolved. Am J Phys Anthropol 116:154–165, 2001. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.