Department of Haematology, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, and Centre for Haematology, St Mary's Hospital campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
Department of Haematology, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, and Centre for Haematology, St Mary's Hospital campus, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
A 59-year-old man with a history of mild cytopenias for the preceding three years presented with a 5-week history of lethargy and reduced exercise tolerance. Physical examination was normal. A complete blood count (CBC) showed pancytopenia with a hemoglobin concentration (Hb) of 114 g/L, platelets of 110 × 109/L and neutrophils of 0.17 × 109/L. The peripheral blood smear showed no morphologic dysplasia or circulating blasts. A bone marrow aspirate showed hypercellular fragments. There was erythroid predominance and marked trilineage dysplasia. In addition to these findings, there was a population of blastoid cells, constituting 15% of nucleated cells, with distinctive morphology (top left). These were large cells with a moderately high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio, immature chromatin and prominent nucleoli. The deeply basophilic cytoplasm contained azurophilic granules. Cytoplasmic vacuoles and blebbing were seen in some cells. Myeloperoxidase staining was negative in the blasts. Flow cytometry surprisingly did not identify a blast population. Immunocytochemical staining using the alkaline phosphatase:anti-alkaline phosphate technique on the bone marrow aspirate was performed. The blasts were negative for CD61 and glycophorin A but weakly positive for CD13/33. Trephine biopsy sections showed an abnormal stromal background with increased edema and vascularity as well as increased T lymphocytes. The blastoid cells were not easily identifiable on a hematoxylin and eosin stain; they were negative with a large range of immunohistochemical stains including CD34, CD117, myeloperoxidase, lymphoid antigens, and plasma cell antigens. Cytogenetic analysis revealed tetrasomy 8, supporting a myeloid disorder. Although the blasts had not been identified by cytochemical, immunohistochemical or immunophenotypic techniques, a diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with excess blasts was made.1
The patient remained stable for almost three months before he developed progressive cytopenias. His CBC at this time showed the Hb had fallen to 78 g/L, platelets were 34 × 109/L, and neutrophils were 0.07 × 109/L. Rare circulating blasts were seen in the peripheral blood smear. A repeat bone marrow aspirate showed markedly hypercellular fragments packed with a monomorphic population of blast cells, which were cytologically identical to the those seen initially (top right). Myeloperoxidase was again negative in the blasts (bottom left). This time, α naphthyl butyrate esterase (ANBE) enzyme cytochemistry was performed which was strongly positive, confirming the monoblastic nature of the cells (bottom right). The original bone marrow aspirate was retrospectively stained with ANBE and the previously unidentified blasts were strongly positive. Flow cytometric immunophenotyping showed a large population of monoblasts with unusually high side scatter. They were positive for HLA-DR, CD15, CD11c, CD64, and CD56 but negative for CD34, CD117, and myeloperoxidase. Due to the patient's long history of cytopenias and presumed history of MDS, a final diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes was made. As monoblasts are rarely found in MDS,2 we postulate that leukemic transformation from underlying MDS was occurring at the time of his first bone marrow biopsy.
This case was a diagnostic challenge. The monoblasts had unusual morphology with some resembling proerythroblasts and others closer to dysplastic myeloblasts/promyelocytes, although neither the shape nor granulation was typical of either. On the original bone marrow aspirate they were difficult to identify as being of myeloid lineage as myeloperoxidase was negative (despite the cytoplasmic granules) and no blast population was identifiable by immunophenotyping. Although the cytological features were not typical for monoblasts and the blast count was <20%, if ANBE had been performed on the original bone marrow aspirate, the monoblasts would have been correctly identified. This would have saved a considerable amount of additional testing although management may not have been altered. This case demonstrates the ongoing utility of cytochemical staining, a technique that has been replaced in many laboratories by immunophenotyping. Cytochemistry remains necessary to assist in the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia, not otherwise specified, as well as in other myeloid neoplasms where the positive identification of monocytic cells is relevant. It is a rapid and easy test that is still relevant in the modern hematology laboratory.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Nothing to report.
REFERENCES
1Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood.2016; 127: 2391–2405.
2Invernizzi R, Quaglia F, Della PMG.Importance of classical morphology in the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis.2015; 7: e2015035.
Please check your email for instructions on resetting your password.
If you do not receive an email within 10 minutes, your email address may not be registered,
and you may need to create a new Wiley Online Library account.
Request Username
Can't sign in? Forgot your username?
Enter your email address below and we will send you your username
If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to retrieve your username
The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.