Timed sequential induction chemotherapy and risk-adapted postremission therapy for acute myelogenous leukemia
Corresponding Author
Matt Kalaycio
Department of Hematologic Malignancies and Blood Disorders, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
9500 Euclid Ave/R35, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195Search for more papers by this authorAnjali Advani
Department of Hematologic Malignancies and Blood Disorders, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
Search for more papers by this authorBrad Pohlman
Department of Hematologic Malignancies and Blood Disorders, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
Search for more papers by this authorMikkael Sekeres
Department of Hematologic Malignancies and Blood Disorders, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
Search for more papers by this authorBarbara Tripp
Department of Hematologic Malignancies and Blood Disorders, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
Search for more papers by this authorLisa Rybicki
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
Search for more papers by this authorRonald Sobecks
Department of Hematologic Malignancies and Blood Disorders, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Matt Kalaycio
Department of Hematologic Malignancies and Blood Disorders, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
9500 Euclid Ave/R35, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195Search for more papers by this authorAnjali Advani
Department of Hematologic Malignancies and Blood Disorders, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
Search for more papers by this authorBrad Pohlman
Department of Hematologic Malignancies and Blood Disorders, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
Search for more papers by this authorMikkael Sekeres
Department of Hematologic Malignancies and Blood Disorders, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
Search for more papers by this authorBarbara Tripp
Department of Hematologic Malignancies and Blood Disorders, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
Search for more papers by this authorLisa Rybicki
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
Search for more papers by this authorRonald Sobecks
Department of Hematologic Malignancies and Blood Disorders, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Cytogenetic analysis at the time of diagnosis predicts outcome in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). For those patients with favorable risk cytogenetics, stem cell transplant can be delayed until the time of relapse. For those patients with nonfavorable cytogenetic risk profiles, stem cell transplant may be required for optimal survival benefit. We treated patients with de novo AML and age less than 60 years first with etoposide, mitoxantrone, cytarabine, and G-CSF (EMA-G) to induce remission. Patients in complete remission were assigned to treatment with chemotherapy alone if they had favorable risk cytogenetics defined as the identification of a core-binding factor translocation. Patients with any other cytogenetic profile were assigned to treatment with either autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplant depending on the availability of an HLA-matched donor. Following EMA-G, 33 of 40 patients (83%) achieved CR. Of the 25 patients who actually were treated with postremission chemotherapy, 21 were treated with their assigned risk-adapted therapy. Of the 33 patients in remission, 5 year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was 46 and 38%, respectively. Our intensive and risk-adapted, stem cell transplant approach to the treatment of patients with AML requires a better definition of risk and does not appear to substantially improve results compared with more standard approaches. Am. J. Hematol., 2008. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
References
- 1 Bishop J,Matthews JP,Young GA, et al. A randomized study of high-dose cytarabine in induction in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 1996; 87: 1710–1717.
- 2 Weick J,Kopecky KJ,Appelbaum FR, et al. A randomized investigation of high-dose versus standard-dose cytosine arabinoside with daunorubicin in patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group study. Blood 1996; 88: 2841–2851.
- 3 Amadori S,Arcese W,Isacchi G, et al. Mitoxantrone, etoposide, and intermediate-dose cytarabine: an effective and tolerable regimen for the treatment of refractory acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9: 1210–1214.
- 4 Bishop J,Lowenthal M,Joshua D, et al. Etoposide in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Australian Leukemia Study Group. Blood 1990; 75: 27–32.
- 5 Archimbaud E,Thomas X,Leblond V, et al. Timed sequential chemotherapy for previously treated patients with acute myeloid leukemia: Long-term follow-up of the etoposide, mitoxantrone, and cytarabine-86 trial. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 11–18.
- 6 Heil G,Chadid L,Hoelzer D, et al. GM-CSF in a double-blind randomized, placebo controlled trial in therapy of adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Leukemia 1995; 9: 3–9.
- 7 Lowenberg B,van Putten W,Theobald M, et al. Effect of priming with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on the outcome of chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 743–752.
- 8 Byrd JC,Dodge RK,Carroll A, et al. Patients with t(8;21)(q22;q22) and acute myeloid leukemia have superior failure-free and overall survival when repetitive cycles of high-dose cytarabine are administered. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 3767–3775.
- 9 Byrd JC,Ruppert AS,Krzysztof M, et al. Repetitive cycles of high-dose cytarabine benefit patients with acute myeloid leukemia and inv(16)(p13q22) or t(16;16)(p13;q22): Results from CALGB 8461. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 1087–1094.
- 10 Lowenberg B,Downing JR,Burnett A. Acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1051–1062.
- 11 Mayer RJ,Davis RB,Schiffer CA, et al. Intensive postremission chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 896–903.
- 12 Bradstock KF,Matthews JP,Lowenthal RM, et al. A randomized trial of high-versus conventional-dose cytarabine in consolidation chemotherapy for adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia in first remission after induction therapy containing high-dose cytarabine. Blood 2005; 105: 481–488.
- 13 Cassileth PA,Harrington DP,Appelbaum FR, et al. Chemotherapy compared with autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in the management of acute myeloid leukemia in first remission. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1649–1656.
- 14 Zittoun RA,Mandelli F,Willemze R,de Witte T,Labar B,Resegotti L, et al. Autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation compared with intensive chemotherapy in acute myelogenous leukemia. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne dell'Adulto (GIMEMA) Leukemia Cooperative Groups. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 217–223.
- 15 Burnett AK,Wheatley K,Goldstone AH,Stevens RF,Hann IM,Rees JHK, et al. The value of allogeneic bone marrow transplant in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia at differing risk of relapse: results of the UK MRC AML 10 trial. Br J Haematol 2002; 118: 385–400.
- 16 He XY,Pohlman B,Lichtin A, et al. Timed-sequential chemotherapy with concomitant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for newly diagnosed de novo acute myelogenous leukemia. Leukemia 2003; 17: 1078–1084.
- 17 Slovak ML,Kopecky KJ,Cassileth PA, et al. Karyotypic analysis predicts outcome of preremission and postremission therapy in adult acute myeloid leukemia: A Southwest Oncology Group/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. Blood 2000; 96: 4075–4083.
- 18 Grimwade D,Walker H,Oliver F, et al. The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: Analysis of 1,612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial. Blood 1998; 92: 2322–2333.
- 19 Schlenk RF,Bennett JM,Hartmann F, et al. Risk-adapted postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: Results of the German multicenter AML HD93 treatment trial. Leukemia 2003; 17: 1521–1528.
- 20 Tallman MS,Anderson JW,Schiffer CA, et al. All-trans-retinoic acid in acute promyelocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 1021–1028.
- 21 Farag SS,Ruppert AS,Mrozek K, et al. Outcome of induction and postremission therapy in younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia with normal karyotype: A Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 482–493.
- 22 Moore JO,George SL,Dodge RK, et al. Sequential multiagent chemotherapy is not superior to high-dose cytarabine alone as postremission intensification therapy for acute myeloid leukemia in adults under 60 years of age: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 9222. Blood 2005; 105: 3420–3427.
- 23 Castaigne S,Chevret S,Archimbaud E, et al. Randomized comparison of double induction and timed-sequential induction to a “3 + 7” induction in adults with AML: long-term analysis of the Acute Leukemia French Association (ALFA) 9000 study. Blood 2004; 104: 2467–2474.
- 24 Mitus AJ,Miller KB,Schenkein DP, et al. Improved survival for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 560–569.
- 25 Cassileth PA,Lee SJ,Miller KB, et al. Feasibility study of adding high-dose cytarabine in induction and in consolidation therapy before autologous stem cell transplant in adult acute myeloid leukemia. Proc Am Soc Hematol 1998; 92: 4559.
- 26 Gale RE,Hills R,Kottaridis PD, et al. No evidence that FLT3 status should be considered as an indicator for transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML): An analysis of 1135 patients, excluding acute promyelocytic leukemia, from the UK MRC AML10 and 12 trials. Blood 2005; 106: 3658–3665.
- 27
Mills KI,Gilkes AF.
Clinical implications of gene expression profiling of acute myeloid leukemia.
Curr Hematologic Malignancy Rep
2006;
1:
114–1221.
10.1007/s11899-006-0022-7 Google Scholar
- 28 Cheson BD,Bennett JM,Kopecky KJ, et al. Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 4642–4649.
- 29 Archimbaud E,Leblond V,Michallet M, et al. Intensive sequential chemotherapy with mitoxantrone and continuous infusion etoposide and cytarabine for previously treated acute myelogenous leukemia. Blood 1994; 77: 1894–1900.
- 30 Kalaycio M. Inpatient management of acute leukemia. Cleve Clin J Med 1997; 64: 385–389.
- 31 Farag SS,Bolwell BJ,Elder PJ, et al. High-dose busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide does not improve outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation compared to BuCy2 in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Bone Marrow Transpl 2005; 35: 653–661.