Volume 83, Issue 11 pp. 831-834
Research Article
Free Access

Timed sequential induction chemotherapy and risk-adapted postremission therapy for acute myelogenous leukemia

Matt Kalaycio

Corresponding Author

Matt Kalaycio

Department of Hematologic Malignancies and Blood Disorders, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio

9500 Euclid Ave/R35, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195Search for more papers by this author
Anjali Advani

Anjali Advani

Department of Hematologic Malignancies and Blood Disorders, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
Brad Pohlman

Brad Pohlman

Department of Hematologic Malignancies and Blood Disorders, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
Mikkael Sekeres

Mikkael Sekeres

Department of Hematologic Malignancies and Blood Disorders, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
Barbara Tripp

Barbara Tripp

Department of Hematologic Malignancies and Blood Disorders, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
Lisa Rybicki

Lisa Rybicki

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
Ronald Sobecks

Ronald Sobecks

Department of Hematologic Malignancies and Blood Disorders, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 July 2008
Citations: 7

Abstract

Cytogenetic analysis at the time of diagnosis predicts outcome in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). For those patients with favorable risk cytogenetics, stem cell transplant can be delayed until the time of relapse. For those patients with nonfavorable cytogenetic risk profiles, stem cell transplant may be required for optimal survival benefit. We treated patients with de novo AML and age less than 60 years first with etoposide, mitoxantrone, cytarabine, and G-CSF (EMA-G) to induce remission. Patients in complete remission were assigned to treatment with chemotherapy alone if they had favorable risk cytogenetics defined as the identification of a core-binding factor translocation. Patients with any other cytogenetic profile were assigned to treatment with either autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplant depending on the availability of an HLA-matched donor. Following EMA-G, 33 of 40 patients (83%) achieved CR. Of the 25 patients who actually were treated with postremission chemotherapy, 21 were treated with their assigned risk-adapted therapy. Of the 33 patients in remission, 5 year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was 46 and 38%, respectively. Our intensive and risk-adapted, stem cell transplant approach to the treatment of patients with AML requires a better definition of risk and does not appear to substantially improve results compared with more standard approaches. Am. J. Hematol., 2008. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.