Special Issue Article
Eyewitness confidence and latency: Indices of memory processes not just markers of accuracy
Neil Brewer,
Nathan Weber,
Corresponding Author
Neil Brewer
Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
School of Psychology, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.Search for more papers by this authorNeil Brewer,
Nathan Weber,
Corresponding Author
Neil Brewer
Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
School of Psychology, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Despite the well-documented fallibility of eyewitness memories, they influence a variety of judgments and decisions by police, lawyers and the courts. Accordingly, psychologists have tried to identify variables that may help ‘corroborate’ the accuracy of witnesses' testimony. Variables considered by memory researchers to be reliable markers of memory (e.g. confidence and decision latency) have been examined, occasionally endorsed, but more commonly rejected as useful indices of the integrity of witnesses' memories. We examine the history of these attempts to isolate reliable eyewitness memory markers, and why it is that researchers interested in exactly the same issues have reached quite different conclusions about the utility of these memorial markers. We argue that, perhaps in their continuing attempts to find decisive practical solutions, researchers and legal practitioners may have focused too much on techniques or solutions that suggest unreasonable expectations of human memory systems, and too little on refining, and then exploiting, the faithful markers of memory. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
REFERENCES
- Bothwell, R. K., Deffenbacher, K. A., & Brigham, J. C. (1987). Correlations of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 691–695.
- Brewer, N., Caon, A., Todd, C., & Weber, N. (2006). Eyewitness identification accuracy and response latency. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 31–50.
-
Brewer, N., &
Day, K.
(2005).
The confidence-accuracy and decision latency–accuracy relationships in children's eyewitness identification.
Psychiatry, Psychology and Law,
12,
119–128.
10.1375/pplt.2005.12.1.119 Google Scholar
- Brewer, N., Gordon, M., & Bond, N. (2000). Effect of photoarray exposure duration on eyewitness identification accuracy and processing strategy. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 6, 21–32.
- Brewer, N., Keast, A., & Rishworth, A. (2002). The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: The effects of reflection and disconfirmation on correlation and calibration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 46–58.
- Brewer, N., & Smith, G. A. (1984). How normal and retarded individuals monitor and regulate speed and accuracy of responding in serial choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 71–93.
- Brewer, N., & Smith, G. A. (1989). Developmental changes in processing speed: Influence of speed-accuracy regulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 298–310.
- Brewer, N., & Smith, G. A. (1990). Processing speed and mental retardation: Deadline procedures indicate fixed and adjustable limitations. Memory and Cognition, 18, 443–450.
- Brewer, N., Weber, N., Clark, A., & Wells, G. L. (in press). Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate eyewitness identifications with an optional deadline procedure. Psychology, Crime and Law.
- Brewer, N., Weber, N., & Semmler, C. (2007). A role for theory in eyewitness identification research. In R. C. L. Lindsay, D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. Toglia (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology: Memory for people (Vol. 2, pp. 201–218). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Brewer, N., & Wells, G. L. (2006). The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: Effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity and target-absent base rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 11–30.
- Brewer, N., & Wootton, D. (2007, July). Identifying the culprit using patterns of confidence judgments across sequentially presented stimuli under response-signal deadlines. Seventh Biennial Conference of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Lewiston ME, USA.
- Busey, T. A., Tunnicliff, J., Loftus, G. R., & Loftus, E. F. (2000). Accounts of the confidence-accuracy relation in recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 26–48.
-
Cooke, W. E.
(1906).
Forecasts and verification in Western Australia.
Monthly Weather Review,
34,
23–24.
10.1175/1520-0493(1906)34<23:FAVIWA>2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar
- Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1989). Moderators of the confidence-accuracy correlation in face recognition: The role of information processing and base-rates. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3, 95–107.
- Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1995). Mistaken identification: The eyewitness, psychology, and the law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Dallenbach, K. M. (1913). The relation of memory error to time interval. Psychological Review, 20, 323–337.
- Dunning, D., & Perretta, S. (2002). Automaticity and eyewitness accuracy: A 10- to 12-second rule for distinguishing accurate from inaccurate positive identifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 951–962.
-
Festinger, L.
(1943).
Studies in decision. I. Decision time, relative frequency of judgment, and subjective confidence as related to physical stimulus difference.
Journal of Experimental Psychology,
32,
291–306.
10.1037/h0056685 Google Scholar
- Fischhoff, B. (1977). Perceived informativeness of facts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 349–358.
- Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1–67.
- Goldsmith, M., Koriat, A., & Pansky, A. (2005). Strategic regulation of grain size in memory reporting over time. Journal of Memory & Language, 52, 505–525.
- Goldsmith, M., Koriat, A., & Weinberg-Eliezer, A. (2002). Strategic regulation of grain size memory reporting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 73–95.
- Henmon, V. A. C. (1911). The relation of the time of a judgment to its accuracy. Psychological Review, 18, 186–201.
- Innocence Project. (2007). Innocence Project. Retrieved September, 2007, from http://www.innocenceproject.org.
- Juslin, P., Olsson, N., & Winman, A. (1996). Calibration and diagnosticity of confidence in eyewitness identification: Comments on what can be inferred from the low confidence-accuracy correlation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1304–1316.
- Kahana, M., & Loftus, G. (1999). Response time versus accuracy in human memory. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of cognition (pp. 323–384). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Kassin, S. M., Tubb, V. A., Hosch, H. M., & Memon, A. (2001). On the “general acceptance” of eyewitness testimony research: A new survey of the experts. American Psychologist, 56, 405–416.
- Keast, A., Brewer, N., & Wells, G. L. (2007). Children's metacognitive judgments in an eyewitness identification task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97, 286–314.
- Kelley, C. M., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Remembering mistaken for knowing: Ease of retrieval as a basis for confidence in answers to general knowledge questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 1–24.
- Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349–370.
- Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490–517.
- Lindsay, D. S., Nilsen, E., & Read, J. D. (2000). Witnessing-condition heterogeneity and witnesses' versus investigators' confidence in the accuracy of witnesses' identification decisions. Law & Human Behavior, 24, 685–697.
- Lindsay, D. S., Read, J. D., & Sharma, K. (1998). Accuracy and confidence in person identification: The relationship is strong when witnessing conditions vary widely. Psychological Science, 9, 215–218.
- Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252–271.
- McNicol, D., & Stewart, G. W. (1980). Reaction time and the study of memory. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction times (pp. 253–307). London: Academic Press.
- Münsterberg, H. (1908). On the witness stand: Essays on psychology and crime. New York: Doubleday, Page & Co.
- Murdock, B. B., Jr., & Dufty, P. O. (1972). Strength theory and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94, 284–290.
- Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188 (1972).
- Pachella, R. G. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information-processing research. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 41–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Penrod, S., Loftus, E., & Winkler, J. (1982). The reliability of eyewitness testimony: A psychological perspective. In N. L. Kerr, & R. M. Bray (Eds.), The psychology of the courtroom (pp. 119–168). New York: Academic Press.
-
Perfect, T. J.
(2002).
When does eyewitness confidence predict performance? In
T. J. Perfect, &
B. L. Schwartz (Eds.),
Applied metacognition (pp.
95–120).
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511489976.006 Google Scholar
- Pierce, C. S., & Jastrow, J. (1885). On small differences in sensation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 3, 75–83.
-
Potter, R., &
Brewer, N.
(1999).
Perceptions of witness behaviour-accuracy relationships held by police, lawyers and jurors.
Psychiatry, Psychology and Law,
6,
97–103.
10.1080/13218719909524952 Google Scholar
- Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59–108.
- Robinson, M. D., & Johnson, J. T. (1996). Recall memory, recognition memory, and the eyewitness confidence-accuracy correlation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 587–594.
- Sauer, J. D., Brewer, N., & Weber, N. (in press). Multiple confidence estimates as indices of eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
- Sauerland, M., & Sporer, S. (in press). Fast and confident: Postdicting eyewitness identification accuracy in a field study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied.
- Semmler, C., Brewer, N., & Wells, G. L. (2004). Effects of postidentification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 334–346.
- Smith, V. L., Kassin, S. M., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1989). Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Within- versus between-subjects correlations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 356–359.
- Sporer, S. L. (1992). Post-dicting eyewitness accuracy: Confidence, decision-times and person descriptions of choosers and non-choosers. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 157–180.
- Sporer, S. L. (1993). Eyewitness identification accuracy, confidence, and decision times in simultaneous and sequential lineups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 22–33.
-
Sporer, S. L.
(1994).
Decision times and eyewitness identification accuracy in simultaneous and sequential lineups. In
D. F. Ross, &
J. D. Read, &
M. P. Toglia (Eds.),
Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp.
300–327).
New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511759192.015 Google Scholar
- Sporer, S. L., Penrod, S. D., Read, J. D., & Cutler, B. L. (1995). Choosing, confidence, and accuracy: A meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 315–327.
- Sternberg, S. (1966). High-speed scanning in human memory. Science, 153, 652–654.
- Trow, W. C. (1923). The psychology of confidence. Archives of Psychology, 67, 3–48.
- Van Zandt, T. (2000). ROC curves and confidence judgments in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 582–600.
- Weber, N., & Brewer, N. (2003). The effect of judgment type and confidence scale on confidence-accuracy calibration in face recognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 490–499.
- Weber, N., & Brewer, N. (2004). Confidence-accuracy calibration in absolute and relative face recognition judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 156–172.
- Weber, N., & Brewer, N. (2006). Positive versus negative face recognition decisions: Confidence, accuracy, and response latency. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 17–31.
- Weber, N., & Brewer, N. (2008). Eyewitness recall: Regulation of grain size and the role of confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 50–60.
- Weber, N., Brewer, N., Wells, G. L., Semmler, C., & Keast, A. (2004). Eyewitness identification accuracy and response latency: The unruly10–12 second rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 139–147.
- Wells, G. L. (1978). Applied eyewitness-testimony research: System variables and estimator variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1546–1557.
- Wells, G. L., & Bradfield, A. L. (1998). “Good, you identified the suspect”: Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 360–376.
- Wells, G. L., & Bradfield, A. L. (1999). Distortions in eyewitnesses' recollections: Can the postidentification-feedback effect be moderated? Psychological Science, 10, 138–144.
- Wells, G. L., & Murray, D. M. (1984). Eyewitness confidence. In G. L. Wells, & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives (pp. 155–170). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Wells, G. L., Small, M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R. S., Fulero, S. M., & Brimacombe, C. A. E. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 603–647.
- Wickelgren, W. A. (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica, 41, 67–85.
- Wixted, J. T., & Stretch, V. (2005). In defense of the signal-detection interpretation of remember/know judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 616–641.
- Wright, D. B. (2007). The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups. Memory, 15, 746–754.
- Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441–517.
