Introducing Pragmatic Approaches in Health Professions Education Research
Bridget C. O'Brien
University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
Search for more papers by this authorMarieke vander Schaaf
University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorand Claire Palermo
Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorBridget C. O'Brien
University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
Search for more papers by this authorMarieke vander Schaaf
University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorand Claire Palermo
Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorCharlotte Rees
The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorLynn Monrouxe
The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorBridget O'Brien
University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
This chapter describes the philosophical underpinnings of pragmatic approaches. It summarises common pragmatic methodologies and methods in health professions education research (HPER). The chapter explains the main indicators of quality employed in pragmatic approaches. It analyses the strengths and challenges of pragmatic approaches for HPER and focuses on the applicability of pragmatic approaches. The chapter presents four case studies to illustrate important issues and considerations when using a pragmatic approach and to explore when a pragmatic approach may be useful to consider in HPER. It provides a brief history of pragmatism explaining multiple theorists' contributions to the philosophy. The chapter considers whether and how each element – axiology, ontology, epistemology, and methodology – aligns with the personal philosophies. Three pragmatic methodologies that are compatible with pragmatic approaches include mixed methods, action research, and constructivist grounded theory.
References
- Biesta GJJ , Burbles NC . Pragmatism and Educational Research . Lanham, Md : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc .; 2003 .
-
Kaushik V
,
Walsh CA
.
Pragmatism as a research paradigm and its implications for social work research
.
Soc Sci
.
2019
;
8
(
9
):
255
.
10.3390/socsci8090255 Google Scholar
- Morgan DL . Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research . Qual Inq . 2014 ; 20 ( 8 ): 1045 – 1053 .
-
Johnson RB
,
Gray R
.
A history of philosophical and theoretical issues for mixed methods research
. In
A Tashakkori
,
C Teddlie
, eds.
SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research
,
2nd
ed.
Thousand Oaks, Calif
.:
SAGE
;
2010
:
69
–
94
.
10.4135/9781506335193.n3 Google Scholar
- Sethi A , Schofield S , Ajjawi R , et al. How do postgraduate qualifications in medical education impact on health professionals? Med Teach . 2016 ; 38 ( 2 ): 162 – 167 .
- Sethi A , Ajjawi R , McAleer S , et al. Exploring the tensions of being and becoming a medical educator . BMC Med Educ . 2017 ; 17 ( 1 ): 62 .
- Sethi A , Schofield S , McAleer S , et al. The influence of postgraduate qualifications on educational identity formation of healthcare professionals . Adv Health Sci Educ . 2018 ; 23 ( 3 ): 567 – 585 .
- Allen LM , Palermo C , Armstrong E , et al. Categorising the broad impacts of continuing professional development: a scoping review . Med Educ . 2019 ; 53 ( 11 ): 1087 – 1099 .
- Allen LM , Hay M , Armstrong E , et al. Applying a social theory of learning to explain the possible impacts of continuing professional development (CPD) programs . Med Teach . 2020 ; 42 ( 10 ): 1140 – 1147 .
- Allen LM , Palermo C , Armstrong E , et al. Measuring impacts of continuing professional development (CPD): the development of the CPD impacts survey (CPDIS) . Med Teach . 2021 ; 43 ( 6 ): 677 – 685 .
-
Agricola BT
,
van der Schaaf MF
,
Prins FJ
, et al.
The development of research supervisors' pedagogical content knowledge in a lesson study project
.
Educ Action Res
.
2022
;
30
(
2
):
261
–
280
.
10.1080/09650792.2020.1832551 Google Scholar
- Dudley P . Teacher learning in lesson study: what interaction-level discourse analysis revealed about how teachers utilised imagination, tacit knowledge of teaching and fresh evidence of pupils learning, to develop practice knowledge and so enhance their pupils' learning . Teach Educ . 2013 ; 34 : 107 – 121 .
-
Cajkler W
,
Wood P
,
Norton J
, et al.
Lesson study as a vehicle for collaborative teacher learning in a secondary school
.
Prof Dev Edu
.
2014
;
40
(
4
):
511
–
529
.
10.1080/19415257.2013.866975 Google Scholar
- Lewis CC , Hurd J . Lesson Study Step by Step: How Teacher Learning Communities Improve Instruction . Portsmouth : Heinemann ; 2011 .
- Haddock LM , Rivera J , O'Brien BC . Learning together: co-learning among faculty and trainees in the clinical workplace . Acad Med . 2023 ; 98 ( 2 ): 228 – 236 .
- Denzin NK , Lincoln YS . The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research , 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif .: SAGE ; 2005 .
- Mertens DM . Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods , 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif .: SAGE ; 2019 .
- Morgan DL . Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods . J Mix Methods Res . 2007 ; 1 ( 1 ): 48 – 76 .
-
Biesta GJJ
.
Pragmatism and the philosophical foundations of mixed methods research
. In
A Tashakkori
,
C Teddlie
, eds.
SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research
,
2nd
ed.
Thousand Oaks, Calif
.:
SAGE
;
2010
:
95
–
118
.
10.4135/9781506335193.n4 Google Scholar
- Legg C , Hookway C . Pragmatism . In EN Zalta , ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy . Stanford, Calif .: Stanford University ; Summer 2021 ed. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/pragmatism (accessed 25 January 2022).
-
Kelly LM
,
Cordeiro M
.
Three principles of pragmatism for research on organizational processes
.
Method Innov
.
2020
;
13
(
2
):
1
–
10
.
10.1177/2059799120937242 Google Scholar
- Hothersall SJ . Epistemology and social work: enhancing the integration of theory, practice and research through philosophical pragmatism . Eur J Soc Work . 2019 ; 22 ( 5 ): 860 – 870 .
-
Johnson RB
,
Onwuegbuzie AJ
.
Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come
.
Educ Res
.
2004
;
33
(
7
):
14
–
26
.
10.3102/0013189X033007014 Google Scholar
- Regehr G . It's NOT rocket science: rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education . Med Educ . 2010 ; 44 ( 1 ): 31 – 39 .
-
Biddle C
,
Schafft KA
.
Axiology and anomaly in the practice of mixed methods work: pragmatism, valuation, and the transformative paradigm
.
J Mix Methods Res
.
2015
;
9
(
4
):
320
–
334
.
10.1177/1558689814533157 Google Scholar
-
Cherryholmes CH
.
Notes on pragmatism and scientific realism
.
Educ Res
.
1992
;
21
(
6
):
13
–
17
.
10.3102/0013189X021006013 Google Scholar
- Rorty R . Pragmatism as anti-representationalism . In JP Murphy , AR Murphy , eds. Pragmatism: From Peirce to Davidson . Boulder, Col .: Westview Press; 1990 ; 1 – 6 .
- Biesta GJJ . Why ‘what works’ still won't work: from evidence-based education to value-based education . Stud Philos Educ . 2010 ; 29 : 491 – 503 .
- Rossman GB , Wilson BL . Numbers and words: combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study . Eval Rev . 1985 ; 9 ( 5 ): 627 – 643 .
- Creswell J , Poth C . Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches , 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif .: SAGE ; 2018 .
- Greene JC . Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry . San Francisco : Jossey-Bass ; 2007 .
- Feilzer MY . Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm . J Mix Methods Res . 2010 ; 4 ( 1 ): 6 – 16 .
- Dewey J . The sources of a science of education . In JA Boydston , ed. John Dewey: The Later Works (1925-1953) Volume 5: 1929–1930 . Carbondale, Ill .: Southern Illinois University Press ; 2011 : 1 – 40 .
- Morgan DL . Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: A Pragmatic Approach . Thousand Oaks, Calif .: SAGE ; 2013 .
-
Johnson RB
,
Onwuegbuzie AJ
,
Turner LA
.
Towards a definition of mixed methods research
.
J Mix Methods Res
.
2007
;
1
(
2
):
112
–
133
.
10.1177/1558689806298224 Google Scholar
- Creswell JW , Plano Clark VL . Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif .: SAGE ; 2017 .
- Leech NL , Onwuegbuzie AJ . A typology of mixed methods research designs . Qual Quant . 2009 ; 43 ( 2 ): 265 – 275 .
- Morse JM , Niehaus L . Mixed Method Design: Principles and Procedures . Walnut Creek, Calif .: Left Coast Press ; 2009 .
- Schifferdecker KE , Reed VA . Using mixed methods research in medical education: basic guidelines for researchers . Med Educ . 2009 ; 43 ( 7 ): 637 – 644 .
- Teddlie CB , Tashakkori A . Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences . Thousand Oaks, Calif .: SAGE ; 2009 .
- Fetters MD , Curry LA , Creswell JW . Achieving integration in mixed methods designs – principles and practices . Health Serv Res . 2013 ; 48 ( 6Part II ): 2134 – 2156 .
-
Bradbury H
. ed.
The Handbook of Action Research
,
3rd
ed.
Thousand Oaks, Calif
.:
SAGE
;
2015
.
10.4135/9781473921290 Google Scholar
- Meyer J . Qualitative research in health care: using qualitative methods in health action research . BMJ . 2000 ; 320 ( 7228 ): 178 – 181 .
-
Mertler CA
.
The Wiley Handbook of Action Research in Education
.
Hoboken, NJ
:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
.;
2019
.
10.1002/9781119399490 Google Scholar
- Greenwood DJ . Pragmatic action research . In D Coghlan , M Brydon-Miller , eds. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Action Research . Thousand Oaks, Calif .: SAGE ; 2014 : 645 – 647 .
-
Cohen L
,
Manion L
,
Morrison K
.
Research Methods in Education
,
6th
ed.
London and New York
:
Routledge
;
2007
.
10.4324/9780203029053 Google Scholar
- Glaser BG , Strauss AL . The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research . Chicago : Aldine ; 1967 .
- Charmaz K . Constructing Grounded Theory , 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif .: SAGE ; 2014 .
- Bakkenes I , Vermunt JD , Wubbels T . Teacher learning in the context of educational innovation: learning activities and learning outcomes of experienced teachers . Learn Instr . 2010 ; 20 ( 6 ): 533 – 548 .
- Magnusson S , Krajcik J , Borko H . Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching . In J Gess-Newsome , NG Lederman , eds. Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Construct and its Implications for Science Education . Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers ; 1999 : 95 – 132 .
- Wongsopawiro DS , Zwart RC , van Driel JH . Identifying pathways of teachers' PCK development . Teachers and Teaching . 2017 ; 23 ( 2 ): 191 – 210 .
- Biesenthal C . Pragmatism . In D Coghlan , M Brydon-Miller , eds. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Action Research . Thousand Oaks, Calif .: SAGE ; 2014 : 648 – 650 .
- Mumford L . The pragmatic acquiescence . In G Kennedy , ed. Pragmatism and American Culture . Boston : DC Heath and Company ; 1950 : 36 – 49 .
-
Argyris C
.
Actionable knowledge: design causality in the service of consequential theory
.
J Appl Behav Sci
.
1996
;
32
(
4
):
390
–
406
.
10.1177/0021886396324004 Google Scholar
-
Bradbury H
.
Quality and “Actionability”: what action researchers offer from the tradition of pragmatism
. In
AB Shani
,
SA Mohrman
,
W Pasmore
, et al., eds.
Handbook of Collaborative Management Research
.
Thousand Oaks, Calif
.:
SAGE
;
2008
:
583
–
600
.
10.4135/9781412976671.n28 Google Scholar
-
O'Cathain A
.
Assessing the quality of mixed methods research: toward a comprehensive framework
. In
A Tashakkori
,
C Teddlie
, eds.
SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research
,
2nd
ed.
Thousand Oaks, Calif
.:
SAGE
;
2010
:
531
–
556
.
10.4135/9781506335193.n21 Google Scholar
-
Bryman A
.
Paradigm peace and the implications for quality
.
Int J Soc Res Methodol
.
2006
;
9
(
2
):
111
–
126
.
10.1080/13645570600595280 Google Scholar
- Tashakkori A , Teddlie C . Quality of inferences in mixed methods research: calling for an integrative framework . In MM Bergman , ed. Advances in Mixed Methods Research: Theories and Applications . London : SAGE ; 2008 : 101 – 119 .
- Hong QN , Pluye P , Fàbregues S , et al. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version 2018. Registration of Copyright (#1148552); Industry Canada : Canadian Intellectual Property Office 2018 .
- O'Cathain A , Murphy E , Nicholl J . The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research . J Health Serv Res Policy . 2008 ; 13 ( 2 ): 92 – 98 .
- Gaglio B , Henton M , Barbeau A , et al. Methodological standards for qualitative and mixed methods patient centered outcomes research . BMJ . 2020 ; 371 : m4435 .
-
Bradbury H
,
Lewis R
,
Embury DC
.
Education action research: with and for the next generation
. In
CA Mertler
, ed.
The Wiley Handbook of Action Research in Education
.
Hoboken
:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
;
2019
:
7
–
28
.
10.1002/9781119399490.ch1 Google Scholar
- Akkerman S , Admiraal W , Brekelmans M , et al. Auditing quality of research in social sciences . Qual Quant . 2008 ; 42 ( 2 ): 257 – 274 .
-
de Kleijn R
,
van Leeuwen A
.
Reflections and review on the audit procedure: guidelines for more transparency
.
Int J Qual Methods
.
2018
;
17
(
1
):
1
–
7
.
10.1177/1609406918763214 Google Scholar
-
Greene JC
,
Caracelli VJ
,
Graham WF
.
Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs
.
Educ Eval Policy Anal
.
1989
;
11
(
3
):
255
–
274
.
10.3102/01623737011003255 Google Scholar
- Greene JC . Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? J Mix Method Res . 2008 ; 2 ( 1 ): 7 – 22 .
- Albert M , Hodges B , Regehr G . Research in medical education: balancing service and science . Adv Health Sci Educ . 2007 ; 12 ( 1 ): 103 – 115 .
- van Enk A , Regehr G . HPE as a field: implications for the production of compelling knowledge . Teach Learn Med . 2018 ; 30 ( 3 ): 337 – 344 .
- Doja A , Lavin Venegas C , Cowley L , et al. Barriers and facilitators to program directors' use of the medical education literature: a qualitative study . BMC Med Educ . 2022 ; 22 ( 1 ): 45 .
- Onyura B , Légaré F , Baker L , et al. Affordances of knowledge translation in medical education: a qualitative exploration of empirical knowledge use among medical educators . Acad Med . 2015 ; 90 ( 4 ): 518 – 524 .
- Thomas A , D Gruppen L , van der Vleuten C , et al. Use of evidence in health professions education: attitudes, practices, barriers and supports . Med Teach . 2019 ; 41 ( 9 ): 1012 – 1022 .
-
Dickstein M
.
The Revival of Pragmatism: New Essays on Social Thought, Law, and Culture
.
Durham, NC
:
Duke University Press
;
1998
.
10.1215/9780822382522 Google Scholar
- Watling CJ , Lingard L . Grounded theory in medical education research: AMEE Guide no. 70 . Med Teach . 2012 ; 34 ( 10 ): 850 – 861 .