Chapter 9

Introducing Pragmatic Approaches in Health Professions Education Research

Bridget C. O'Brien

Bridget C. O'Brien

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Louise Allen

Louise Allen

Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Ahsan Sethi

Ahsan Sethi

Qatar University, Doha, Qatar

Search for more papers by this author
Marieke vander Schaaf

Marieke vander Schaaf

University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
and Claire Palermo

and Claire Palermo

Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 August 2023
Citations: 2

Summary

This chapter describes the philosophical underpinnings of pragmatic approaches. It summarises common pragmatic methodologies and methods in health professions education research (HPER). The chapter explains the main indicators of quality employed in pragmatic approaches. It analyses the strengths and challenges of pragmatic approaches for HPER and focuses on the applicability of pragmatic approaches. The chapter presents four case studies to illustrate important issues and considerations when using a pragmatic approach and to explore when a pragmatic approach may be useful to consider in HPER. It provides a brief history of pragmatism explaining multiple theorists' contributions to the philosophy. The chapter considers whether and how each element – axiology, ontology, epistemology, and methodology – aligns with the personal philosophies. Three pragmatic methodologies that are compatible with pragmatic approaches include mixed methods, action research, and constructivist grounded theory.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.