Chapter 12

Impact in Health Professions Education Research

Charlotte E. Rees

Charlotte E. Rees

The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia

Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Olivia A. King,and

Olivia A. King,and

Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

Western Alliance, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Lynn V. Monrouxe

Lynn V. Monrouxe

The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 August 2023

Summary

This chapter summarises different understandings of research impact and explains the philosophical underpinnings of different approaches to research impact. It describes research impact pathways within health professions education research (HPER). The chapter evaluates key enablers and barriers of HPER impact and outlines the different ways of assessing HPER impact. It establishes the strategies to plan for and enhances impact from HPER. The chapter discusses the research impact experiences drawing on three illustrative cases: a research programme on healthcare professionalism, a research project on dignity during work-integrated learning and a research programme setting priorities for HPER. Realist research unpacks mechanisms that generate outcomes, and the contexts triggering those mechanisms; so-called context–mechanism–outcome configurations. Interpretivist approach explores the unpredictability of research impacts, with interpretivist impact studies focusing on social interaction. There are different philosophical approaches to impact, meaning that different ways of understanding and assessing impact exist.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.