Chapter 3

When to Intervene—Should Surgical Guidelines Apply to Transcatheter Techniques in Treating Mitral Regurgitation?

Samir Kapadia

Samir Kapadia

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Rishi Puri

Rishi Puri

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kinjal Banerjee

Kinjal Banerjee

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Lars G. Svensson

Lars G. Svensson

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 March 2021

Summary

In clinical practice, guidelines attempt to summarize the status quo of the best available evidence for managing patients with a given disease. Given the rapid expansion of transcatheter mitral valve interventions in inoperable or high-surgical-risk individuals, considerable interest lies in how one should contextualize the emerging transcatheter technologies within the framework of clinical guidelines. Surgery remains the gold-standard approach for treating severe primary mitral regurgitation (MR). However, the dramatic and ongoing evolution of transcatheter mitral valve therapies, coupled with significant long-standing (largely European) experience with the edge-to-edge MitraClip system for both primary and secondary severe MR, has allowed a percutaneous approach to find its place in the treatment armamentarium of high-risk MR patients. Further trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of transcatheter treatment approaches for severe MR, as well as the use of small footprint devices on lower-surgical-risk patients with secondary MR of moderate severity.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.