The Importance of Minimally Invasive Approaches for Mitral Valve Repair
Bobby Yanagawa
Division of Cardiac Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorNiv Ad
Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
Search for more papers by this authorBobby Yanagawa
Division of Cardiac Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorNiv Ad
Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
Search for more papers by this authorRon Waksman
Section of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
Search for more papers by this authorToby Rogers
Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
Section of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
Minimally invasive cardiac surgery mitral valve surgery (MICS MVS) that was pioneered almost three decades ago was proven to be as effective as procedures performed through midline sternotomy, however, with clear advantages in patient recovery following valve surgery. Patient selection is critical to MIMVS. Particularly for less-experienced surgeons starting a MICS MVS program, potential candidates should have uncomplicated mitral pathology, reasonable chest wall anatomy, and few comorbidities. Generally, cannulation for MICS MVS is achieved with femoral arterial and venous cannulation. The two options for myocardial protection are to clamp and arrest the heart and to use a fibrillating heart approach. Minimally invasive mitral valve repair has comparable surgical mortality to standard median sternotomy approaches, but offers reduced pain, bleeding and transfusion, and length of hospital stay with faster surgical recovery.
References
- Massimiano, P.S., Yanagawa, B., Henry, L. et al. (2013). Minimally invasive fibrillating heart surgery: a safe and effective approach for mitral valve and surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 96: 520–527.
- Falk, V., Cheng, D.C., Martin, J. et al. (2011). Minimally invasive versus open mitral valve surgery: a consensus statement of the international society of minimally invasive coronary surgery (ISMICS) 2010. Innovations (Phila) 6: 66–76.
- Seeburger, J., Borger, M.A., Falk, V. et al. (2008). Minimal invasive mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation: results of 1339 consecutive patients. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 34: 760–765.
- Hawkins, R.B., Mehaffey, J.H., Mullen, M.G. et al. (2018). A propensity matched analysis of robotic, minimally invasive, and conventional mitral valve surgery. Heart 104: 1970–1975.
- Cao, C., Gupta, S., Chandrakumar, D. et al. (2013). A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional mitral valve repair for patients with degenerative mitral disease. Ann. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2: 693–703.
- Cheng, D.C., Martin, J., Lal, A. et al. (2011). Minimally invasive versus conventional open mitral valve surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Innovations (Phila) 6: 84–103.
- Moscarelli, M., Fattouch, K., Casula, R. et al. (2016). What is the role of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery in high-risk patients? A meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 101: 981–989.
- Sündermann, S.H., Sromicki, J., Rodriguez Cetina Biefer, H. et al. (2014). Mitral valve surgery: right lateral minithoracotomy or sternotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 148: 1989–1995.e4.
- Mazine, A., Vistarini, N., Ghoneim, A. et al. (2015). Very high repair rate using minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of degenerative mitral insufficiency. Can. J. Cardiol. 31: 744–751.
- Ad, N. and Cox, J.L. (2004). The maze procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a minimally invasive approach. J. Card. Surg. 19: 196–200.
- Gammie, J.S., Zhao, Y., Peterson, E.D. et al. (2010). J. Maxwell chamberlain memorial paper for adult cardiac surgery. Less-invasive mitral valve operations: trends and outcomes from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons adult cardiac surgery database. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 90: 1401–1408.
- Lehr, E.J., Guy, T.S., Smith, R.L. et al. (2016). Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery III: training and robotic-assisted approaches. Innovations (Phila) 11: 260–267.
- Wolfe, J.A., Malaisrie, S.C., Farivar, R.S. et al. (2016). Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery II: surgical technique and postoperative management. Innovations (Phila) 11: 251–259.
- Ailawadi, G., Agnihotri, A.K., Mehall, J.R. et al. (2016). Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery I: patient selection, evaluation, and planning. Innovations (Phila) 11: 243–250.
- Nishi, H., Miyata, H., Motomura, N. et al. (2015). Propensity-matched analysis of minimally invasive mitral valve repair using a nationwide surgical database. Surg. Today 45: 1144–1152.
- Beckmann, A., Meyer, R., Lewandowski, J. et al. (2018). German heart surgery report 2017: the annual updated registry of the German society for thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 66: 608–621.
- Takagi, H., Ando, T., Umemoto, T., and ALICE (All-Literature Investigation of Cardiovascular Evidence) Group (2017). A review of comparative studies of MitraClip versus surgical repair for mitral regurgitation. Int. J. Cardiol. 228: 289–294.
- Kiefer, P., Meier, S., Noack, T. et al. (2018). Good 5-year durability of transapical beating heart off-pump mitral valve repair with Neochordae. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 106: 440–445.
- Stone, G.W., Lindenfeld, J., Abraham, W.T. et al. (2018). Transcatheter mitral-valve repair in patients with heart failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 379: 2307–2318.
- Obadia, J.F., Messika-Zeitoun, D., Leurent, G. et al. (2018). Percutaneous repair or medical treatment for secondary mitral regurgitation. N. Engl. J. Med. 379: 2297–2306.
- Wyler von Ballmoos, M.C., Kalra, A., and Reardon, M.J. (2018). Complexities of transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) and why it is not transcatheteraortic valve replacement (TAVR). Ann. Cardiothorac. Surg. 7: 724–730.
- Castillo, J.G., Anyanwu, A.C., Fuster, V., and Adams, D.H. (2012). A near 100% repair rate for mitral valve prolapse is achievable in a reference center: implications for future guidelines. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 144: 308–312.
- Mehaffey, H.J., Hawkins, R.B., Schubert, S. et al. (2018). Contemporary outcomes in reoperative mitral valve surgery. Heart 104: 652–656.
- Daemen, J.H.T., Heuts, S., Olsthoorn, J.R. et al. (2018). Right minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy for reoperative mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 54: 817–825.
- Iribarne, A., Easterwood, R., Russo, M.J. et al. (2012). Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus traditional sternotomy mitral valve surgery in elderly patients. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 143: S86–S90.
- Wang, A., Brennan, J.M., Zhang, S. et al. (2018). Robotic mitral valve repair in older individuals: an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 106: 1388–1393.
- Chan, E.Y., Lumbao, D.M., Iribarne, A. et al. (2012). Evolution of cannulation techniques for minimally invasive cardiac surgery: a 10-year journey. Innovations (Phila) 7: 9–14.
- Khan, H., Hadjittofi, C., Uzzaman, M. et al. (2018). External aortic clamping versus endoaortic balloon occlusion in minimally invasivecardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 27: 208–214.
- da Rocha, E., Silva, J.G., Spampinato, R. et al. (2015). Barlow's mitral valve disease: a comparison of Neochordal (loop) and edge-to-edge (Alfieri) minimally invasive repair techniques. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 100: 2127–2133.
- Vistarini, N., Lalibert, E., Beauchamp, P. et al. (2017). Del Nido cardioplegia in the setting of minimally invasive aortic valve surgery. Perfusion 32: 112–117.
- Modi, P., Hassan, A., and Chitwood, W.R. Jr. (2008). Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 34: 943–952.
- Ad, N., Holmes, S.D., Shuman, D.J. et al. (2015). Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamping and with femoral cannulation is not associated with increased risk of stroke compared with traditional mitral valve surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 48: 868–872.
- Iribarne, A., Russo, M.J., Easterwood, R. et al. (2010). Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery: a propensity analysis. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 90: 1471–1477.
- Irisawa, Y., Hiraoka, A., Totsugawa, T. et al. (2016). Re-expansion pulmonary oedema after minimally invasive cardiac surgery with right mini-thoracotomy. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 49: 500–505.
- Hawkins, R.B., Mehaffey, J.H., Kessel, S.M. et al. (2018). Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery associated with excellent resource utilization, cost, and outcomes. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 156: 611–616.