Climate Change and Stomatal Physiology
Annual Plant Reviews Online 2019 Volume 2
Issue 3, August 2019
Jack S. A. Matthews,
Tracy Lawson,
Jack S. A. Matthews
School of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
Search for more papers by this authorTracy Lawson
School of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
Search for more papers by this authorJack S. A. Matthews,
Tracy Lawson,
Jack S. A. Matthews
School of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
Search for more papers by this authorTracy Lawson
School of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Stomata control the uptake of CO2 into the leaf along with water loss through transpiration and are critical for maintaining plant water status and leaf temperature. The predicted changes in future climate conditions; including atmospheric [CO2], temperature, and water availability will greatly influence stomatal development and functional response. As stomata account for 95% of terrestrial gaseous fluxes of water and carbon, their behaviour has major consequences for global hydrological and carbon cycles, with implications for precipitation patterns, land run-off and drought events. Furthermore, as water demand for agricultural practices is predicted to increase, crop production for sustainable food security will require improvements in plant water use efficiency, to which stomatal conductance and dynamic responses to environmental conditions are key components. Stomatal response is often the combination of several environmental and internal stimuli, and is, therefore, difficult to predict across ecosystem types. Here, we review stomatal response to key environmental factors at the leaf and ecosystem levels, and highlight the influence of changes in stomatal anatomical and functional behaviour on earth systems and ecosystem function in the face of climate change.
References
- Aasamaa, K. and Sõber, A. (2011). Responses of stomatal conductance to simultaneous changes in two environmental factors. Tree Physiology 31: 855–864.
- Ainsworth, E.A. and Rogers, A. (2007). The response of photosynthesis and Stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant, Cell and Environment 30 (3): 258–270.
- Allen, M.T. and Pearcy, R.W. (2000). Stomatal behavior and photosynthetic performance under dynamic light regimes in a seasonally dry tropical rain forest. Oecologia 122: 470–478.
- Anderegg, W.R., Klein, T., Bartlett, M. et al. (2016). Meta-analysis reveals that hydraulic traits explain cross-species patterns of drought-induced tree mortality across the globe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113 (18): 5024–5029.
- Anderegg, W.R., Konings, A.G., Trugman, A.T. et al. (2018a). Hydraulic diversity of forests regulates ecosystem resilience during drought. Nature 561 (7724): 538.
- Anderegg, W.R., Wolf, A., Arango-Velez, A. et al. (2018b). Woody plants optimise stomatal behaviour relative to hydraulic risk. Ecology Letters 21 (7): 968–977.
- Aphalo, P.J. and Jarvis, P.G. (1991). Do stomata respond to relative humidity? Plant, Cell and Environment 14 (1): 127–132.
- Aphalo, P.J. and Jarvis, P.G. (1993). An analysis of Ball's empirical model of stomatal conductance. Annals of Botany 72 (4): 321–327.
- Apple, M.E., Olszyk, D.M., Ormrod, D.P. et al. (2000). Morphology and stomatal function of Douglas fir needles exposed to climate change: elevated CO2 and temperature. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 (1): 127–132.
- Arve, L.E., Kruse, O.M.O., Tanino, K.K. et al. (2017). Daily changes in VPD during leaf development in high air humidity increase the stomatal responsiveness to darkness and dry air. Journal of Plant Physiology 211: 63–69.
- Baldocchi, D.D. and Harley, P.C. (1995). Scaling carbon dioxide and water vapour exchange from leaf to canopy in a deciduous forest. II. Model testing and application. Plant, Cell and Environment 18 (10): 1157–1173.
- Baldocchi, D. (2014). Measuring fluxes of trace gases and energy between ecosystems and the atmosphere – the state and future of the eddy covariance method. Global Change Biology 20: 3600–3609.
- Ball, J.T. and Berry, J.A. (1982). Ci/Cs Ratio: A Basis for Predicting Stomatal Control of Photosynthesis. Wash: Year B. Carnegie Inst.
- Ball, J.T., Woodrow, I.E., and Berry, J.A. (1987). A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. In: Progress in Photosynthesis Research (ed. J. Biggins), 221–224. The Netherlands: Springer.
- Baroli, I., Price, G.D., Badger, M.R., and Von Caemmerer, S. (2008). The contribution of photosynthesis to the red light response of stomatal conductance [OA]. Plant Physiology 146: 737–747.
- Barradas, V.L., Jones, H.G., and Clark, J.A. (1994). Stomatal responses to changing irradiance in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Journal of Experimental Botany 45: 931–936.
- Beerling, D.J. and Chaloner, W.G. (1993). Evolutionary responses of stomatal density to global CO2 change. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 48 (4): 343–353.
- Beerling, D.J. and Kelly, C.K. (1997). Stomatal density responses of temperate woodland plants over the past seven decades of CO2 increase: a comparison of Salisbury (1927) with contemporary data. American Journal of Botany 84 (11): 1572–1583.
- Bergmann, D.C. and Sack, F.D. (2007). Stomatal development. Annual Review of Plant Biology 58: 163–181.
- Bernacchi, C.J., Portis, A.R., Nakano, H. et al. (2002). Temperature response of mesophyll conductance. Implications for the determination of Rubisco enzyme kinetics and for limitations to photosynthesis in vivo. Plant Physiology 130 (4): 1992–1998.
- Bernacchi, C.J., Calfapietra, C., Davey, P.A. et al. (2003). Photosynthesis and stomatal conductance responses of poplars to free-air CO2 enrichment (PopFACE) during the first growth cycle and immediately following coppice. The New Phytologist 159 (3): 609–621.
- Bernacchi, C.J., Kimball, B.A., Quarles, D.R. et al. (2007). Decreases in stomatal conductance of soybean under open-air elevation of [CO2] are closely coupled with decreases in ecosystem evapotranspiration. Plant Physiology 143: 134–144.
- Bernacchi, C.J., Bagley, J.E., Serbin, S.P. et al. (2013). Modelling C3 photosynthesis from the chloroplast to the ecosystem. Plant, Cell and Environment 36 (9): 1641–1657.
- Berry, J. and Bjorkman, O. (1980). Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 31 (1): 491–543.
- Berry, J.A., Beerling, D.J., and Franks, P.J. (2010). Stomata: key players in the earth system, past and present. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 13 (3): 232–239.
- Berryman, C.A., Eamus, D., and Duff, G.A. (1994). Stomatal responses to a range of variables in two tropical tree species grown with CO2 enrichment. Journal of Experimental Botany 45 (5): 539–546.
- Betts, R.A., Boucher, O., Collins, M. et al. (2007). Projected increase in continental runoff due to plant responses to increasing carbon dioxide. Nature 448 (7157): 1037.
- Bickford, C.P. (2016). Ecophysiology of leaf trichomes. Functional Plant Biology 43 (9): 807–814.
- Bishop, K.A., Leakey, A.D., and Ainsworth, E.A. (2014). How seasonal temperature or water inputs affect the relative response of C3 crops to elevated [CO2]: a global analysis of open top chamber and free air CO2 enrichment studies. Food and Energy Security 3 (1): 33–45.
- Blatt, M.R. (1988). Potassium-dependent, bipolar gating of K+ channels in guard cells. The Journal of Membrane Biology 102 (3): 235–246.
- Blatt, M.R. (2000). Cellular signaling and volume control in stomatal movements in plants. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 16: 221–241.
- Blom-Zandstra, M., Pot, C.S., Maas, F.M., and Schapendonk, A.H.C.M. (1995). Effects of different light treatments on the nocturnal transpiration and dynamics of stomatal closure of two Rose cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae (Amsterdam) 61: 251–262.
- Bonan, G.B., Williams, M., Fisher, R.A., and Oleson, K.W. (2014). Modeling stomatal conductance in the earth system: linking leaf water-use efficiency and water transport along the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum. Geoscientific Model Development 7: 2193–2222.
- Brodribb, T.J. and McAdam, S.A.M. (2017). Evolution of the stomatal regulation of plant water content. Plant Physiology 174: 639–649.
- Buckley, T.N., Mott, K.A., and Farquhar, G.D. (2003). A hydromechanical and biochemical model of stomatal conductance. Plant, Cell and Environment 26 (10): 1767–1785.
- Buckley, T.N. (2005). The control of stomata by water balance. The New Phytologist 168 (2): 275–292.
- Buckley, T.N. and Mott, K.A. (2013). Modelling stomatal conductance in response to environmental factors. Plant, Cell and Environment 36: 1691–1699.
- Buckley, T.N. (2017). Modeling stomatal conductance. Plant Physiology 174: 572–582.
- Caine, R.S., Yin, X., Sloan, J. et al. (2019). Rice with reduced stomatal density conserves water and has improved drought tolerance under future climate conditions. The New Phytologist 221 (1): 371–384.
- Caird, M.A., Richards, J.H., and Donovan, L.A. (2007). Nighttime stomatal conductance and transpiration in C3 and C4 plants. Plant Physiology 143: 4–10.
- Carmo-Silva, A.E. and Salvucci, M.E. (2013). The regulatory properties of Rubisco activase differ among species and affect photosynthetic induction during light transitions. Plant Physiology 161 (4): 1645–1655.
- Casson, S. and Gray, J.E. (2008). Influence of environmental factors on stomatal development. The New Phytologist 178 (1): 9–23.
- Casson, S.A. and Hetherington, A.M. (2010). Environmental regulation of stomatal development. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 13: 90–95.
- Chaloner, W.G. and McElwain, J. (1997). The fossil plant record and global climatic change. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 95 (1–4): 73–82.
- Chater, C., Kamisugi, Y., Movahedi, M. et al. (2011). Regulatory mechanism controlling stomatal behavior conserved across 400 million years of land plant evolution. Current Biology 21: 1025–1029.
- Chaves, M.M., Maroco, J.P., and Pereira, J.S. (2003). Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology 30 (3): 239–264.
- Chaves, M.M., Flexas, J., and Pinheiro, C. (2009). Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Annals of Botany 103 (4): 551–560.
- Chen, Z.H., Hills, A., Bätz, U. et al. (2012). Systems dynamic modeling of the stomatal guard cell predicts emergent behaviors in transport, signaling, and volume control. Plant Physiology 159: 1235–1251.
- Cochard, H., Martin, R., Gross, P., and Bogeat-Triboulot, M.B. (2000). Temperature effects on hydraulic conductance and water relations of Quercus robur L. Journal of Experimental Botany 51 (348): 1255–1259.
- Cowan, I.R. and Troughton, J.H. (1971). The relative role of stomata in transpiration and assimilation. Planta 97: 325–336.
- Cowan, I.R. and Farquhar, G.D. (1977). Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism and environment. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 31: 471–505.
- Crafts-Brandner, S.J. and Salvucci, M.E. (2002). Sensitivity of photosynthesis in a C4 plant, maize, to heat stress. Plant Physiology 129 (4): 1773–1780.
- Daloso, D.M., Dos Anjos, L., and Fernie, A.R. (2016). Roles of sucrose in guard cell regulation. The New Phytologist 211: 809–818.
- Damour, G., Simonneau, T., Cochard, H., and Urban, L. (2010). An overview of models of stomatal conductance at the leaf level. Plant, Cell and Environment 33: 1419–1438.
- de Dios, V.R., Goulden, M.L., Ogle, K. et al. (2012). Endogenous circadian regulation of carbon dioxide exchange in terrestrial ecosystems. Global Change Biology 18: 1956–1970.
- De Kauwe, M.G., Kala, J., Lin, Y.S. et al. (2015). A test of an optimal stomatal conductance scheme within the CABLE land surface model. Geoscientific Model Development 8: 431–452.
- De Pury, D.G.G. and Farquhar, G.D. (1997). Simple scaling of photosynthesis from leaves to canopies without the errors of big-leaf models. Plant, Cell and Environment 20 (5): 537–557.
- Dewar, R.C., Franklin, O., Mäkelä, A. et al. (2009). Optimal function explains forest responses to global change. Bioscience 59: 127–139.
- Dodd, A.N., Jakobsen, M.K., Baker, A.J. et al. (2006). Time of day modulates low-temperature Ca2+ signals in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 48 (6): 962–973.
- Dore, M.H. (2005). Climate change and changes in global precipitation patterns: what do we know? Environment International 31 (8): 1167–1181.
- Dow, G.J., Berry, J.A., and Bergmann, D.C. (2017). Disruption of stomatal lineage signaling or transcriptional regulators has differential effects on mesophyll development, but maintains coordination of gas exchange. The New Phytologist 216 (1): 69–75.
- Drake, P.L., Froend, R.H., and Franks, P.J. (2013). Smaller, faster stomata: scaling of stomatal size, rate of response, and stomatal conductance. Journal of Experimental Botany 64: 495–505.
- Elliott-Kingston, C., Haworth, M., Yearsley, J.M. et al. (2016). Does size matter? Atmospheric CO2 may be a stronger driver of stomatal closing rate than stomatal size in taxa that diversified under low CO2. Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 1253.
- Farquhar, G.D. and Raschke, K. (1978). On the resistance to transpiration of the sites of evaporation within the leaf. Plant Physiology 61: 1000–1005.
- Farquhar, G.D., Von Caemmerer, S., and Berry, J.A. (1980). A biochemical model of photosynthesis CO2 fixation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149: 78–90.
- Farquhar, G.D. and Sharkey, T.D. (1982). Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 33: 317–345.
- Farquhar, G.D. and Wong, S.C. (1984). An empirical model of stomatal conductance. Functional Plant Biology 11: 191–210.
- Field, C.B., Jackson, R.B., and Mooney, H.A. (1995). Stomatal responses to increased CO2: implications from the plant to the global scale. Plant, Cell and Environment 18 (10): 1214–1225.
- Field, K.J., Duckett, J.G., Cameron, D.D., and Pressel, S. (2015). Stomatal density and aperture in non-vascular land plants are non-responsive to above-ambient atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Annals of Botany 115 (6): 915–922.
- Fischer, R.A. and Rebetzke, G.J. (2018). Indirect selection for potential yield in early-generation, spaced plantings of wheat and other small-grain cereals: a review. Crop and Pasture Science 69 (5): 439–459.
- Fischer, R.A., Rees, D., Sayre, K.D. et al. (1998). Wheat yield progress associated with higher stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate, and cooler canopies. Crop Science 38 (6): 1467–1475.
- Franks, P.J. and Beerling, D.J. (2009). Maximum leaf conductance driven by CO2 effects on stomatal size and density over geologic time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 10343–10347.
- Frank, D.C., Poulter, B., Saurer, M. et al. (2015). Water-use efficiency and transpiration across European forests during the Anthropocene. Nature Climate Change 5 (6): 579.
- Fredeen, A.L. and Sage, R.F. (1999). Temperature and humidity effects on branchlet gas-exchange in white spruce: an explanation for the increase in transpiration with branchlet temperature. Trees 14 (3): 161–168.
10.1007/s004680050220 Google Scholar
- Galmés, J., Medrano, H., and Flexas, J. (2007). Photosynthetic limitations in response to water stress and recovery in Mediterranean plants with different growth forms. The New Phytologist 175 (1): 81–93.
- Gerosa, G., Mereu, S., Finco, A., and Marzuoli, R. (2012). Stomatal conductance modeling to estimate the evapotranspiration of natural and agricultural ecosystems. In: Evapotranspiration-Remote Sensing and Modeling. InTech.
10.5772/21825 Google Scholar
- Hansen, J., Sato, M., and Ruedy, R. (2012). Perception of climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109 (37): E2415–E2423.
- Haworth, M., Heath, J., and McElwain, J.C. (2010). Differences in the response sensitivity of stomatal index to atmospheric CO2 among four genera of Cupressaceae conifers. Annals of Botany 105 (3): 411–418.
- Haworth, M., Elliott-Kingston, C., and McElwain, J.C. (2011). Stomatal control as a driver of plant evolution. Journal of Experimental Botany 62 (8): 2419–2423.
- Haworth, M., Elliott-Kingston, C., and McElwain, J.C. (2013). Co-ordination of physiological and morphological responses of stomata to elevated [CO2] in vascular plants. Oecologia 171 (1): 71–82.
- Haworth, M., Marino, G., Cosentino, S.L. et al. (2018). Increased free abscisic acid during drought enhances stomatal sensitivity and modifies stomatal behaviour in fast growing giant reed (Arundo donax L.). Environmental and Experimental Botany 147: 116–124.
- Hedrich, R. and Marten, I. (1993). Malate-induced feedback regulation of plasma membrane anion channels could provide a CO2 sensor to guard cells. The EMBO Journal 12: 897–901.
- Hedrich, R., Marten, I., Lohse, G. et al. (1994). Malate sensitive anion channels enable guard cells to sense changes in the ambient CO2 concentration. The Plant Journal 6: 741–748.
- Hetherington, A.M. and Woodward, F.I. (2003). The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature 424: 901–908.
- Hills, A., Chen, Z.H., Amtmann, A. et al. (2012). OnGuard, a computational platform for quantitative kinetic modeling of guard cell physiology. Plant Physiology 159: 1026–1042.
- Hill, K.E., Guerin, G.R., Hill, R.S., and Watling, J.R. (2015). Temperature influences stomatal density and maximum potential water loss through stomata of Dodonaea viscosa subsp. angustissima along a latitude gradient in southern Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 62 (8): 657–665.
- Hussain, M.Z., VanLoocke, A., Siebers, M.H. et al. (2013). Future carbon dioxide concentration decreases canopy evapotranspiration and soil water depletion by field-grown maize. Global Change Biology 19 (5): 1572–1584.
- Inoue, S.-I. and Kinoshita, T. (2017). Blue light regulation of stomatal opening and the plasma membrane H1-ATPase. Plant Physiology 174: 531–538.
- IPCC (2013). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ed. T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley). Cambridge, UK/New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 1535 p.
- Jackson, R.B., Sala, O.E., Field, C.B., and Mooney, H.A. (1994). CO2 alters water use, carbon gain, and yield for the dominant species in a natural grassland. Oecologia 98: 257–262.
- Jarvis, P.G. and McNaughton, K.G. (1986). Stomatal control of transpiration: scaling up from leaf to region. In: Advances in Ecological Research, vol. 15, 1–49. Academic Press.
- Jarvis, P.G. (1995). Scaling processes and problems. Plant, Cell and Environment 18 (10): 1079–1089.
- Jones, H.G. (2013). Plants and Microclimate: A Quantitative Approach to Environmental Plant Physiology. Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511845727 Google Scholar
- Kang, Y., Outlaw, W.H. Jr. Andersen, P.C., and Fiore, G.B. (2007). Guard-cell apoplastic sucrose concentration: a link between leaf photosynthesis and stomatal aperture size in the apoplastic phloem loader Vicia faba L. Plant, Cell & Environment 30: 551–558.
- Kapadiya, K.B., Singh, C., Bhalara, R.L. et al. (2017). Effect of higher temperature on leaf anatomy of heat tolerance and heat susceptible wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.) by scanning electron microscopy. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6 (5): 2270–2277.
- Katul, G.G., Oren, R., Manzoni, S. et al. (2012). Evapotranspiration: a process driving mass transport and energy exchange in the soil-plant-atmosphere-climate system. Reviews of Geophysics 50 (3). doi: 10.1029/2011RG000366.
- Keenan, T.F., Davidson, E., Moffat, A.M. et al. (2012). Using model-data fusion to interpret past trends, and quantify uncertainties in future projections, of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling. Global Change Biology 18: 2555–2569.
- Keenan, T.F., Hollinger, D.Y., Bohrer, G. et al. (2013). Increase in forest water-use efficiency as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations rise. Nature 499: 324–327.
- Keenan, T.F., Gray, J., Friedl, M.A. et al. (2014). Net carbon uptake has increased through warming-induced changes in temperature forest phenology. Nature Climate Change 4: 598–604.
- Keenan, T.F., Prentice, I.C., Canadell, J.G. et al. (2016). Recent pause in the growth rate of atmospheric CO2 due to enhanced terrestrial carbon uptake. Nature Communications 7: 13428.
- Keenan, T.F. and Williams, C.A. (2018). The terrestrial carbon sink. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 43: 219–243.
- Kelly, G., Moshelion, M., David-Schwartz, R. et al. (2013). Hexokinase mediates stomatal closure. The Plant Journal 75: 977–988.
- Kimball, B.A., Mauney, J.R., Nakayama, F.S., and Idso, S.B. (1993). Effects of increasing atmospheric CO2 on vegetation. Vegetatio 10: 65–75.
10.1007/BF00048145 Google Scholar
- Klein, T. (2014). The variability of stomatal sensitivity to leaf water potential across tree species indicates a continuum between isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. Functional Ecology 28 (6): 1313–1320.
- Köhler, I.H., Ruiz-Vera, U.M., VanLoocke, A. et al. (2016). Expression of cyanobacterial FBP/SBPase in soybean prevents yield depression under future climate conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany 68 (3): 715–726.
- Lake, J.A., Quick, W.P., Beerling, D.J., and Woodward, F.I. (2001). Plant development: signals from mature to new leaves. Nature 411 (6834): 154.
- Lammertsma, E.I., de Boer, H.J., Dekker, S.C. et al. (2011). Global CO2 rise leads to reduced maximum stomatal conductance in Florida vegetation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108 (10): 4035–4040.
- Lawson, T., James, W., and Weyers1, J. (1998). A surrogate measure of stomatal aperture. Journal of Experimental Botany 49: 1397–1403.
- Lawson, T., Oxborough, K., Morison, J.I.L., and Baker, N.R. (2003). The responses of guard and mesophyll cell photosynthesis to CO2, O2, light, and water stress in a range of species are similar. Journal of Experimental Botany 54: 1743–1752.
- Lawson, T. and Morison, J.I.L. (2004). Stomatal function and physiology. In: The Evolution of Plant Physiology, 217–242. Elsevier.
10.1016/B978-012339552-8/50013-5 Google Scholar
- Lawson, T., Lefebvre, S., Baker, N.R. et al. (2008). Reductions in mesophyll and guard cell photosynthesis impact on the control of stomatal responses to light and CO2. Journal of Experimental Botany 59: 3609–3619.
- Lawson, T. (2009). Guard cell photosynthesis and stomatal function. The New Phytologist 181: 13–34.
- Lawson, T., von Caemmerer, S., and Baroli, I. (2010). Photosynthesis and stomatal behaviour. In: Progress in Botany (ed. U.E. Lüttge, W. Beyschlag, B. Büdel and D. Francis), 265–304. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
10.1007/978-3-642-13145-5_11 Google Scholar
- Lawson, T., Kramer, D.M., and Raines, C.A. (2012). Improving yield by exploiting mechanisms underlying natural variation of photosynthesis. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 23: 215–220.
- Lawson, T. and Blatt, M.R. (2014). Stomatal size, speed, and responsiveness impact on photosynthesis and water use efficiency. Plant Physiology 164: 1556–1570.
- Lawson, T., Simkin, A.J., Kelly, G., and Granot, D. (2014). Mesophyll photosynthesis and guard cell metabolism impacts on stomatal behaviour. The New Phytologist 203: 1064–1081.
- Lawson, T., Terashima, I., Fujita, T., and Wang, Y. (2018). Coordination between photosynthesis and stomatal behavior. In: The Leaf: A Platform for Performing Photosynthesis, 141–161. Cham: Springer.
10.1007/978-3-319-93594-2_6 Google Scholar
- Lawson, T. and Vialet-Chabrand, S. (2019). Speedy stomata, photosynthesis and plant water use efficiency. The New Phytologist 221 (1): 93–98.
- Leakey, A.D., Bernacchi, C.J., Ort, D.R., and Long, S.P. (2006). Long-term growth of soybean at elevated [CO2] does not cause acclimation of stomatal conductance under fully open-air conditions. Plant, Cell and Environment 29 (9): 1794–1800.
- Leakey, A.D., Ainsworth, E.A., Bernacchi, C.J. et al. (2009). Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE. Journal of Experimental Botany 60 (10): 2859–2876.
- Lee, J. and Bowling, D.J.F. (1992). Effect of the mesophyll on stomatal opening in Commelina communis. Journal of Experimental Botany 43: 951–957.
- Lee, J.S. and Bowling, D.J.F. (1995). Influence of the mesophyll on stomatal opening. Functional Plant Biology 22: 357–363.
- Lee, M., Choi, Y., Burla, B. et al. (2008). The ABC transporter AtABCB14 is a malate importer and modulates stomatal response to CO2. Nature Cell Biology 10: 1217–1223.
- Lin, J., Jach, M.E., and Ceulemans, R. (2001). Stomatal density and needle anatomy of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) are affected by elevated CO2. The New Phytologist 150 (3): 665–674.
- Lodge, R.J., Dijkstra, P., Drake, B.G., and Morison, J.I. (2001). Stomatal acclimation to increased CO2 concentration in a Florida scrub oak species Quercus myrtifolia Willd. Plant, Cell and Environment 24 (1): 77–88.
- Long, S.P. (1991). Modification of the response of photosynthetic productivity to rising temperature by atmospheric CO2 concentrations: has its importance been underestimated? Plant, Cell and Environment 14 (8): 729–739.
- Long, S.P., Ainsworth, E.A., Rogers, A., and Ort, D.R. (2004). Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide: plants FACE the future. Annual Review of Plant Biology 55: 591–628.
- Lu, P., Zhang, S.Q., Outlaw, W.H., and Riddle, K.A. (1995). Sucrose: a solute that accumulates in the guard-cell apoplast and guard-cell symplast of open stomata. FEBS Letters 362: 180–184.
- Lu, P., Outlaw, W.H. Jr. Smith, B.G., and Freed, G.A. (1997). A new mechanism for the regulation of stomatal aperture size in intact leaves: accumulation of mesophyll-derived sucrose in the guard-cell wall of Vicia faba. Plant Physiology 114: 109–118.
- Lu, Z., Percy, R.G., Qualset, C.O., and Zeiger, E. (1998). Stomatal conductance predicts yields in irrigated Pima cotton and bread wheat grown at high temperatures. Journal of Experimental Botany 453–460.
- Lu, Z., Quiñones, M.A., and Zeiger, E. (2000). Temperature dependence of guard cell respiration and stomatal conductance co-segregate in an F2 population of Pima cotton. Functional Plant Biology 27 (5): 457–462.
10.1071/PP98128 Google Scholar
- Lugassi, N., Kelly, G., Fidel, L. et al. (2015). Expression of arabidopsis hexokinase in citrus guard cells controls stomatal aperture and reduces transpiration. Frontiers in Plant Science 6: 1114.
- Luomala, E.M., Laitinen, K., Sutinen, S. et al. (2005). Stomatal density, anatomy and nutrient concentrations of Scots pine needles are affected by elevated CO2 and temperature. Plant, Cell and Environment 28 (6): 733–749.
- Maherali, H., Reid, C.D., Polley, H.W. et al. (2002). Stomatal acclimation over a subambient to elevated CO2 gradient in a C3/C4 grassland. Plant, Cell and Environment 25 (4): 557–566.
- Mansfield, T.A., Hetherington, A.M., and Atkinson, C.J. (1990). Some current aspects of stomatal physiology. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 41: 55–75.
- Martins, S.C.V., Mcadam, S.A.M., Deans, R.M. et al. (2016). Stomatal dynamics are limited by leaf hydraulics in ferns and conifers: Results from simultaneous measurements of liquid and vapour fluxes in leaves. Plant, Cell and Environment 39: 694–705.
- Martin-StPaul, N., Delzon, S., and Cochard, H. (2017). Plant resistance to drought depends on timely stomatal closure. Ecology Letters 20 (11): 1437–1447.
- Matthews, J.S.A., Vialet-Chabrand, S., and Lawson, T. (2017). Diurnal variation in gas exchange: the balance between carbon fixation and water loss. Plant Physiology 174: 614–623.
- Matthews, J.S., Vialet-Chabrand, S.R., and Lawson, T. (2018). Acclimation to fluctuating light impacts the rapidity of response and diurnal rhythm of stomatal conductance. Plant Physiology 176 (3): 1939–1951.
- McAdam, S.A.M. and Brodribb, T.J. (2012). Stomatal innovation and the rise of seed plants. Ecology Letters 15: 1–8.
- McAinsh, M.R. and Pittman, J.K. (2009). Shaping the calcium signature. The New Phytologist 181: 275–294.
- McAusland, L., Vialet-Chabrand, S., Davey, P. et al. (2016). Effects of kinetics of light-induced stomatal responses on photosynthesis and water-use efficiency. The New Phytologist 211: 1209–1220.
- McElwain, J.C. and Chaloner, W.G. (1995). Stomatal density and index of fossil plants track atmospheric carbon dioxide in the Palaeozoic. Annals of Botany 76 (4): 389–395.
- McNaughton, K.G. and Jarvis, P.G. (1991). Effects of spatial scale on stomatal control of transpiration. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 54 (2–4): 279–302.
- Medlyn, B.E., Barton, C.V.M., Broadmeadow, M.S.J. et al. (2001). Stomatal conductance of forest species after long-term exposure to elevated CO2 concentration: a synthesis. The New Phytologist 149 (2): 247–264.
- Medlyn, B.E., Duursma, R.A., Eamus, D. et al. (2011). Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance. Global Change Biology 17 (6): 2134–2144.
- Mega, R., Abe, F., Kim, J.S. et al. (2019). Tuning water-use efficiency and drought tolerance in wheat using abscisic acid receptors. Nature Plants 5 (2): 153.
- Meidner, H. (1987). The humidity response of stomata and its measurement. Journal of Experimental Botany 38 (5): 877–882.
- Meinzer, F.C., Goldstein, G., Holbrook, N.M. et al. (1993). Stomatal and environmental control of transpiration in a lowland tropical forest tree. Plant, Cell and Environment 16 (4): 429–436.
- Mencuccini, M., Mambelli, S., and Comstock, J. (2000). Stomatal responsiveness to leaf water status in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is a function of time of day. Plant, Cell and Environment 23: 1109–1118.
- Mencuccini, M., Manzoni, S., and Christoffersen, B. (2019). Modelling water fluxes in plants: from tissues to biosphere. New Phytologist .
- Merilo, E., Jõesaar, I., Brosché, M., and Kollist, H. (2014). To open or to close: species-specific stomatal responses to simultaneously applied opposing environmental factors. The New Phytologist 202 (2): 499–508.
- Messinger, S.M., Buckley, T.N., and Mott, K.A. (2006). Evidence for involvement of photosynthetic processes in the stomatal response to CO2. Plant Physiology 140: 771–778.
- Miyazawa, S.I., Livingston, N.J., and Turpin, D.H. (2005). Stomatal development in new leaves is related to the stomatal conductance of mature leaves in poplar (Populus trichocarpa × P. deltoides). Journal of Experimental Botany 57 (2): 373–380.
- Moriana, A., Villalobos, F.J., and Fereres, E. (2002). Stomatal and photosynthetic responses of olive (Olea europaea L.) leaves to water deficits. Plant, Cell and Environment 25: 395–405.
- Morison, J.I.L. (2003). Plant water use, stomatal control. In: Encyclopedia of Water Science, 680–685. New York: Marcel Dekker.
- Morison, J.I.L., Baker, N.R., Mullineaux, P.M., and Davies, W.J. (2007). Improving water use in crop production. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363 (1491): 639–658.
- Mott, K.A. (1988). Do stomata respond to CO2 concentrations other than intercellular? Plant Physiology 86: 200–203.
- Mott, K.A. and Parkhurst, D.F. (1991). Stomatal responses to humidity in air and helox. Plant, Cell and Environment 14: 509–515.
- Mott, K.A., Sibbernsen, E.D., and Shope, J.C. (2008). The role of the mesophyll in stomatal responses to light and CO2. Plant, Cell and Environment 31: 1299–1306.
- Mott, K.A. and Peak, D. (2013). Testing a vapour-phase model of stomatal responses to humidity. Plant, Cell and Environment 36: 936–944.
- Motzer, T., Munz, N., Küppers, M. et al. (2005). Stomatal conductance, transpiration and sap flow of tropical montane rain forest trees in the southern Ecuadorian Andes. Tree Physiology 25 (10): 1283–1293.
- Naumburg, E. and Ellsworth, D.S. (2000). Photosynthetic sunfleck utilization potential of understory saplings growing under elevated CO2 in FACE. Oecologia 122: 163–174.
- Noe, S.M. and Giersch, C. (2004). A simple dynamic model of photosynthesis in oak leaves: coupling leaf conductance and photosynthetic carbon fixation by a variable intracellular CO2 pool. Functional Plant Biology 31: 1195–1204.
- Novick, K.A., Ficklin, D.L., Stoy, P.C. et al. (2016). The increasing importance of atmospheric demand for ecosystem water and carbon fluxes. Nature Climate Change 6 (11): 1023.
- Outlaw, W.H. (2003). Integration of cellular and physiological functions of guard cells. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 22: 503–529.
- Pandey, R., Chacko, P.M., Choudhary, M.L. et al. (2007). Higher than optimum temperature under CO2 enrichment influences stomata anatomical characters in rose (Rosa hybrida). Scientia Horticulturae 113 (1): 74–81.
- Parry, M.A., Andralojc, P.J., Scales, J.C. et al. (2012). Rubisco activity and regulation as targets for crop improvement. Journal of Experimental Botany 64 (3): 717–730.
- Pennisi, E. (2008). The blue revolution, drop by drop, gene by gene. Science 320 (5873): 171–173.
- Perdomo, J.A., Capó-Bauçà, S., Carmo-Silva, E., and Galmés, J. (2017). Rubisco and rubisco activase play an important role in the biochemical limitations of photosynthesis in rice, wheat, and maize under high temperature and water deficit. Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 490.
- Perkins, S.E., Alexander, L.V., and Nairn, J.R. (2012). Increasing frequency, intensity and duration of observed global heatwaves and warm spells. Geophysical Research Letters 39 (20). doi: 10.1029/2012GL053361.
- Peters, W., van der Velde, I.R., Van Schaik, E. et al. (2018). Increased water-use efficiency and reduced CO2 uptake by plants during droughts at a continental scale. Nature Geoscience 11 (10): 744.
- Purcell, C., Batke, S.P., Yiotis, C. et al. (2018). Increasing stomatal conductance in response to rising atmospheric CO2. Annals of Botany 121 (6): 1137–1149.
- Raschke, K. (1975). Stomatal action. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 26: 309–340.
- Raven, P.H., Evert, R.F., and Eichhorn, S.E. (2005). Biology of Plants. W.H. Freeman and Co. Ltd.
- Reddy, A.R., Rasineni, G.K., and Raghavendra, A.S. (2010). The impact of global elevated CO2 concentration on photosynthesis and plant productivity. Current Science 46–57.
- Rodríguez, V.M., Soengas, P., Alonso-Villaverde, V. et al. (2015). Effect of temperature stress on the early vegetative development of Brassica oleracea L. BMC Plant Biology 15 (1): 145.
- Roelfsema, M.R.G. and Hedrich, R. (2005). In the light of stomatal opening: new insights into ‘the Watergate’. The New Phytologist 167: 665–691.
- Sage, R.F. and Sharkey, T.D. (1987). The effect of temperature on the occurrence of O2 and CO2 insensitive photosynthesis in field grown plants. Plant Physiology 84 (3): 658–664.
- Sage, R.F. and Kubien, D.S. (2007). The temperature response of C3 and C4 photosynthesis. Plant, Cell and Environment 30 (9): 1086–1106.
- Salvucci, M.E., Osteryoung, K.W., Crafts-Brandner, S.J., and Vierling, E. (2001). Exceptional sensitivity of Rubisco activase to thermal denaturation in vitro and in vivo. Plant Physiology 127 (3): 1053–1064.
- Santelia, D. and Lawson, T. (2016). Rethinking guard cell metabolism. Plant Physiology 172: 1371–1392.
- Santrucek, J. and Sage, R.F. (1996). Acclimation of stomatal conductance to a CO2-enriched atmosphere and elevated temperature in Chenopodium album. Functional Plant Biology 23 (4): 467–478.
- Schulze, E.D., Lange, O.L., Evenari, M. et al. (1974). The role of air humidity and leaf temperature in controlling stomatal resistance of Prunus armeniaca L. under desert conditions. Oecologia 17 (2): 159–170.
- Sharkey, T.D. and Raschke, K. (1981). Separation and measurement of direct and indirect effects of light on stomata. Plant Physiology 68: 33–40.
- Sibbernsen, E. and Mott, K.A. (2010). Stomatal responses to flooding of the intercellular air spaces suggest a vapor-phase signal between the mesophyll and the guard cells. Plant Physiology 153: 1435–1442.
- Slot, M., Garcia, M.N., and Winter, K. (2016). Temperature response of CO2 exchange in three tropical tree species. Functional Plant Biology 43 (5): 468–478.
- Smith, N.G., Keenan, T.F., Prentice, C.I. et al. (2019). Global photosynthetic capacity is optimized to the environment. Ecology Letters 22 (3): 506–517.
- Sperry, J.S., Venturas, M.D., Anderegg, W.R.L. et al. (2016). Predicting stomatal responses to the environment from the optimization of photosynthetic gain and hydraulic cost. Plant, Cell and Environment 40 (6): 816–830.
- Spreitzer, R.J. and Salvucci, M.E. (2002). Rubisco: structure, regulatory interactions, and possibilities for a better enzyme. Annual Review of Plant Biology 53 (1): 449–475.
- Stéfanon, M., Drobinski, P., D'Andrea, F. et al. (2014). Soil moisture-temperature feedbacks at meso-scale during summer heat waves over Western Europe. Climate Dynamics 42 (5–6): 1309–1324.
- Swann, A.L., Hoffman, F.M., Koven, C.D., and Randerson, J.T. (2016). Plant responses to increasing CO2 reduce estimates of climate impacts on drought severity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113 (36): 10019–10024.
- Teskey, R., Wertin, T., Bauweraerts, I. et al. (2015). Responses of tree species to heat waves and extreme heat events. Plant, Cell and Environment 38: 1699–1712.
- Tezara, W., Mitchell, V.J., Driscoll, S.D., and Lawlor, D.W. (1999). Water stress inhibits plant photosynthesis by decreasing coupling factor and ATP. Nature 401 (6756): 914.
- Tominaga, M., Kinoshita, T., and Shimazaki, K. (2001). Guard-cell chloroplasts provide ATP required for H+ pumping in the plasma membrane and stomatal opening. Plant, Cell and Environment 42: 795–802.
- Tricker, P.J., Trewin, H., Kull, O. et al. (2005). Stomatal conductance and not stomatal density determines the long-term reduction in leaf transpiration of poplar in elevated CO2. Oecologia 143 (4): 652–660.
- Tricker, P.J., Pecchiari, M., Bunn, S.M. et al. (2009). Water use of a bioenergy plantation increases in a future high CO2 world. Biomass and Bioenergy 33 (2): 200–208.
- Tricker, P.J., ElHabti, A., Schmidt, J., and Fleury, D. (2018). The physiological and genetic basis of combined drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany 69 (13): 3195–3210.
- Tuzet, A., Perrier, A., and Leuning, R. (2003). A coupled model of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis. Plant, Cell and Environment 26: 1097–1116.
- Urban, J., Ingwers, M., McGuire, M.A., and Teskey, R.O. (2017a). Stomatal conductance increases with rising temperature. Plant Signaling and Behavior 12 (8): e1356534.
- Urban, J., Ingwers, M.W., McGuire, M.A., and Teskey, R.O. (2017b). Increase in leaf temperature opens stomata and decouples net photosynthesis from stomatal conductance in Pinus taeda and Populus deltoides x nigra. Journal of Experimental Botany 68 (7): 1757–1767.
- Van Der Sleen, P., Groenendijk, P., Vlam, M. et al. (2014). No growth stimulation of tropical trees by 150 years of CO2 fertilization but water-use efficiency increased. Nature Geoscience 8 (1): 24.
- Venturas, M.D., Sperry, J.S., Love, D.M. et al. (2018). A stomatal control model based on optimization of carbon gain versus hydraulic risk predicts aspen sapling responses to drought. The New Phytologist 220 (3): 836–850.
- Vialet-Chabrand, S., Dreyer, E., and Brendel, O. (2013). Performance of a new dynamic model for predicting diurnal time courses of stomatal conductance at the leaf level. Plant, Cell and Environment 36: 1529–1546.
- Vialet-Chabrand, S., Matthews, J.S.A., Brendel, O. et al. (2016). Modelling water use efficiency in a dynamic environment: an example using Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Science 251: 65–74.
- Vialet-Chabrand, S. and Lawson, T. (2019). Dynamic leaf energy balance: deriving stomatal conductance from thermal imaging in a dynamic environment. Journal of Experimental Botany 70 (10): 2839–2855.
- Vialet-Chabrand, S.R., Matthews, J.S., Simkin, A.J. et al. (2017a). Importance of fluctuations in light on plant photosynthetic acclimation. Plant Physiology 173 (4): 2163–2179.
- Vialet-Chabrand, S.R., Matthews, J.S., McAusland, L. et al. (2017b). Temporal dynamics of stomatal behavior: modeling and implications for photosynthesis and water use. Plant Physiology 174 (2): 603–613.
- Vico, G., Manzoni, S., Palmroth, S., and Katul, G. (2011). Effects of stomatal delays on the economics of leaf gas exchange under intermittent light regimes. The New Phytologist 192: 640–652.
- Von Caemmerer, S., Lawson, T., Oxborough, K. et al. (2004). Stomatal conductance does not correlate with photosynthetic capacity in transgenic tobacco with reduced amounts of Rubisco. Journal of Experimental Botany 55: 1157–1166.
- Von Caemmerer, S. and Evans, J.R. (2015). Temperature responses of mesophyll conductance differ greatly between species. Plant, Cell and Environment 38 (4): 629–637.
- Wang, Y. and Blatt, M.R. (2011). Anion channel sensitivity to cytosolic organic acids implicates a central role for oxaloacetate in integrating ion flux with metabolism in stomatal guard cells. Biochemical Journal 439 (1): 161–170.
- Wang, P. and Song, C.P. (2008). Guard-cell signalling for hydrogen peroxide and abscisic acid. The New Phytologist 178: 703–718.
- Way, D.A. (2011). The bigger they are, the harder they fall: CO2 concentration and tree size affect drought tolerance. Tree Physiology 31 (2): 115–116.
- Wilkinson, S. and Davies, W.J. (2002). ABA-based chemical signalling: the co-ordination of responses to stress in plants. Plant, Cell and Environment 25 (2): 195–210.
- Willmer, C. and Fricker, M. (1996). Stomata. Springer Science & Business Media.
10.1007/978-94-011-0579-8 Google Scholar
- Wilson, K.B. and Bunce, J.A. (1997). Effects of carbon dioxide concentration on the interactive effects of temperature and water vapour on stomatal conductance in soybean. Plant, Cell and Environment 20 (2): 230–238.
- Wolf, A., Anderegg, W.R.L., and Pacala, S.W. (2016). Optimal stomatal behavior with competition for water and risk of hydraulic impairment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113: E7222–E7230.
- Wong, S.C., Cowan, I.R., and Farquhar, G.D. (1979). Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Nature 282: 424–426.
- Woodward, F.I. (1987). Stomatal numbers are sensitive to increases in CO2 from pre-industrial levels. Nature 327 (6123): 617.
- Xu, L. and Baldocchi, D.D. (2003). Seasonal trends in photosynthetic parameters and stomatal conductance of blue oak (Quercus douglasii) under prolonged summer drought and high temperature. Tree Physiology 23 (13): 865–877.
- Xu, D.Q., Gifford, R.M., and Chow, W.S. (1994). Photosynthetic acclimation in pea and soybean to high atmospheric CO2 partial pressure. Plant Physiology 106 (2): 661–671.
- Xu, Z., Jiang, Y., Jia, B., and Zhou, G. (2016). Elevated-CO2 response of stomata and its independence on environmental factors. Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 657.
- Yamori, W., Noguchi, K., Hanba, Y.T., and Terashima, I. (2006). Effects of internal conductance on the temperature dependence of the photosynthetic rate in spinach leaves from contrasting growth temperatures. Plant & Cell Physiology 47 (8): 1069–1080.
- Yan, W., Zhong, Y., and Shangguan, Z. (2016). A meta-analysis of leaf gas exchange and water status responses to drought. Scientific Reports 6: 20917.
- Yan, W., Zhong, Y., and Shangguan, Z. (2017). Contrasting responses of leaf stomatal characteristics to climate change: a considerable challenge to predict carbon and water cycles. Global Change Biology 23 (9): 3781–3793.
- Zeiger, E. and Zhu, J. (1998). Role of zeaxanthin in blue light photoreception and the modulation of light–CO2 interactions in guard cells. Journal of Experimental Botany 49: 433–442.
Citing Literature
Browse other articles of this reference work:
