Dermoscopy of Melanocytic Lesions in the Paediatric Population
Maria L. Marino
Department of Dermatology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJennifer L. DeFazio
Department of Dermatology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
Search for more papers by this authorRalph P. Braun
Dermatology Clinic, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorAshfaq A. Marghoob
Department of Dermatology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
Search for more papers by this authorMaria L. Marino
Department of Dermatology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJennifer L. DeFazio
Department of Dermatology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
Search for more papers by this authorRalph P. Braun
Dermatology Clinic, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorAshfaq A. Marghoob
Department of Dermatology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
Search for more papers by this authorPeter Hoeger
Search for more papers by this authorVeronica Kinsler
Search for more papers by this authorAlbert Yan
Search for more papers by this authorJohn Harper
Search for more papers by this authorArnold Oranje
Search for more papers by this authorChristine Bodemer
Search for more papers by this authorMargarita Larralde
Search for more papers by this authorVibhu Mendiratta
Search for more papers by this authorDiana Purvis
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
This chapter addresses dermoscopic features of melanocytic lesions, both benign and malignant, in the paediatric population. While the majority of melanocytic lesions in children are benign, on rare occasions melanoma can develop and it is critical that clinicians are able to identify these malignancies while the cancer is in its early evolutionary stages. To avoid missing a melanoma, many clinicians resort to the biopsy of many naevi, with over 600 naevi being biopsied in children for every melanoma found. In an effort to improve the ability to differentiate naevi from melanoma, clinicians can use technologies such as dermoscopy. It has been shown that dermoscopy improves the clinician's diagnostic accuracy, helps detect melanomas at an earlier stage, and correctly identifies banal naevi, preventing the biopsy of many of these lesions. To adequately use and interpret the dermoscopic findings to know when to biopsy and when it is safe to monitor a lesion does require training. In this chapter, we highlight the salient features seen with dermoscopy that are important in differentiating certain naevi from melanoma. The two-step dermoscopy algorithm and dermoscopic features of congenital melanocytic naevi, acquired naevi, halo naevi, Spitz naevi and melanoma are reviewed. When evaluating melanocytic lesions in children, it is also important to remember that as opposed to the adult population, the process of naevogenesis in children is more dynamic, with new naevi forming, evolving/growing and involuting. In this chapter, we will also describe the dermoscopic features of normal evolving melanocytic naevi. While melanomas in children can have morphological features associated with superficial spreading melanoma, many have features associated with nodular and amelanotic melanomas. The clinical and dermoscopic features of paediatric melanoma are reviewed. In summary, this chapter provides a framework for the dermoscopic evaluation of melanocytic lesions in children.
References
- Marghoob AA, Scope A. The complexity of diagnosing melanoma. J Invest Dermatol 2009; 129(1): 11–13.
- Cordoro KM, Gupta D, Frieden IJ et al. Pediatric melanoma: results of a large cohort study and proposal for modified ABCD detection criteria for children. J Am Acad Dermatol 2013; 68(6): 913–25.
- Binder M, Puespoeck-Schwarz M, Steiner A et al. Epiluminescence microscopy of small pigmented skin lesions: short-term formal training improves the diagnostic performance of dermatologists. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 36(2 Pt 1): 197–202.
- Pagnanelli G, Soyer HP, Argenziano G et al. Diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions by dermoscopy: web-based training improves diagnostic performance of non-experts. Br J Dermatol 2003; 148(4): 698–702.
- Kittler H, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. Lancet Oncol 2002; 3(3): 159–65.
- Bafounta ML, Beauchet A, Aegerter P, Saiag P. Is dermoscopy (epiluminescence microscopy) useful for the diagnosis of melanoma? Results of a meta-analysis using techniques adapted to the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Arch Dermatol 2001; 137(10): 1343–50.
- Vestergaard ME, Macaskill P, Holt PE, Menzies SW. Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting. Br J Dermatol 2008; 159(3): 669–76.
- Pan Y, Gareau DS, Scope A et al. Polarized and nonpolarized dermoscopy: the explanation for the observed differences. Arch Dermatol 2008; 144(6): 828–9.
- Benvenuto-Andrade C, Dusza SW, Agero AL et al. Differences between polarized light dermoscopy and immersion contact dermoscopy for the evaluation of skin lesions. Arch Dermatol 2007; 143(3): 329–38.
- Yadav S, Vossaert KA, Kopf AW et al. Histopathologic correlates of structures seen on dermoscopy (epiluminescence microscopy). Am J Dermatopathol 1993; 15(4): 297–305.
- Rezze GG, Scramim AP, Neves RI, Landman G. Structural correlations between dermoscopic features of cutaneous melanomas and histopathology using transverse sections. Am J Dermatopathol 2006; 28(1): 13–20.
- Massi D, de Giorgi V, Soyer HP. Histopathologic correlates of dermoscopic criteria. Dermatol Clin 2001; 19(2): 259–68, vii.
- Menzies SW, Gutenev A, Avramidis M et al. Short-term digital surface microscopic monitoring of atypical or changing melanocytic lesions. Arch Dermatol 2001; 137(12): 1583–9.
-
Benvenuto-Andrade C, Marghood AA. Ten reasons why dermoscopy is beneficial for the evaluation of skin lesions. Exp Rev Dermatol 2006; 1(3): 369–74.
10.1586/17469872.1.3.369 Google Scholar
- Cramer SF, Salgado CM, Reyes-Mugica M. The high multiplicity of prenatal (congenital type) naevi in adolescents and adults. Evidence for the intradermal origin of prenatal naevi. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2016; 19(5): 409–16.
- Krengel S, Scope A, Dusza SW et al. New recommendations for the categorization of cutaneous features of congenital melanocytic naevi. J Am Acad Dermatol 2013; 68(3): 441–51.
- Krengel S, Hauschild A, Schafer T. Melanoma risk in congenital melanocytic naevi: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol 2006; 155(1): 1–8.
- Kinsler VA, Chong WK, Aylett SE, Atherton DJ. Complications of congenital melanocytic naevi in children: analysis of 16 years' experience and clinical practice. Br J Dermatol 2008; 159(4): 907–14.
- Krengel S, Marghoob AA. Current management approaches for congenital melanocytic naevi. Dermatol Clin 2012; 30(3): 377–87.
- Alikhan A, Ibrahimi OA, Eisen DB. Congenital melanocytic naevi: where are we now? Part I. Clinical presentation, epidemiology, pathogenesis, histology, malignant transformation, and neurocutaneous melanosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 67(4): 495.e1–17; quiz 512–14.
- Slutsky JB, Barr JM, Femia AN, Marghoob AA. Large congenital melanocytic naevi: associated risks and management considerations. Semin Cutan Med Surg 2010; 29(2): 79–84.
- Charbel C, Fontaine RH, Malouf GG et al. NRAS mutation is the sole recurrent somatic mutation in large congenital melanocytic naevi. J Invest Dermatol 2014; 134(4): 1067–74.
- Schaffer JV. Update on melanocytic naevi in children. Clin Dermatol 2015; 33(3): 368–86.
- Braun RP, Calza AM, Krischer J, Saurat JH. The use of digital dermoscopy for the follow-up of congenital naevi: a pilot study. Pediatr Dermatol 2001; 18(4): 277–81.
- Haliasos EC, Kerner M, Jaimes N et al. Dermoscopy for the pediatric dermatologist part III: dermoscopy of melanocytic lesions. Pediatr Dermatol 2013; 30(3): 281–93.
-
Marghoob AA, Braun RP, Malvehy J. Atlas of Dermoscopy, 2nd edn. New York: Informa Healthcare, 2012.
10.3109/9781841847627 Google Scholar
- Soyer HP, Kenet RO, Wolf IH et al. Clinicopathological correlation of pigmented skin lesions using dermoscopy. Eur J Dermatol 2000; 10(1): 22–8.
- Soyer HP, Smolle J, Hodl S et al. Surface microscopy. A new approach to the diagnosis of cutaneous pigmented tumors. Am J Dermatopathol 1989; 11(1): 1–10.
- Kenet RO, Kang S, Kenet BJ et al. Clinical diagnosis of pigmented lesions using digital epiluminescence microscopy. Grading protocol and atlas. Arch Dermatol 1993; 129(2): 157–74.
- Seidenari S, Ferrari C, Borsari S et al. The dermoscopic variability of pigment network in melanoma in situ. Melanoma Res 2012; 22(2): 151–7.
- Soyer HP, Argenziano G, Chimenti S, Ruocco V. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions. Eur J Dermatol 2001; 11(3): 270–6; quiz 2777.
- Changchien L, Dusza SW, Agero AL et al. Age- and site-specific variation in the dermoscopic patterns of congenital melanocytic naevi: an aid to accurate classification and assessment of melanocytic naevi. Arch Dermatol 2007; 143(8): 1007–14.
- Seidenari S, Pellacani G, Martella A et al. Instrument-, age- and site-dependent variations of dermoscopic patterns of congenital melanocytic naevi: a multicentre study. Br J Dermatol 2006; 155(1): 56–61.
- Nordlund JJ. The lives of pigment cells. Dermatol Clin 1986; 4(3): 407–18.
- Zalaudek I, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Kittler H et al. A dual concept of nevogenesis: theoretical considerations based on dermoscopic features of melanocytic naevi. J Deutsch Dermatol Ges 2007; 5(11): 985–92.
- Strauss RM, Newton Bishop JA. Spontaneous involution of congenital melanocytic naevi of the scalp. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 58(3): 508–11.
- Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, Mordente I et al. Nevus type in dermoscopy is related to skin type in white persons. Arch Dermatol 2007; 143(3): 351–6.
- Orlow I, Satagopan JM, Berwick M et al. Genetic factors associated with naevus count and dermoscopic patterns: preliminary results from the Study of Naevi in Children (SONIC). Br J Dermatol 2015; 172(4): 1081–9.
- Bajaj S, Dusza SW, Marchetti MA et al. Growth-curve modeling of naevi with a peripheral globular pattern. JAMA Dermatol 2015; 151(12): 1338–45.
- Banky JP, Kelly JW, English DR et al. Incidence of new and changed naevi and melanomas detected using baseline images and dermoscopy in patients at high risk for melanoma. Arch Dermatol 2005; 141(8): 998–1006.
- Scope A, Dusza SW, Marghoob AA et al. Clinical and dermoscopic stability and volatility of melanocytic naevi in a population-based cohort of children in Framingham school system. J Invest Dermatol 2011; 131(8): 1615–21.
- LaVigne EA, Oliveria SA, Dusza SW et al. Clinical and dermoscopic changes in common melanocytic naevi in school children: the Framingham school nevus study. Dermatology 2005; 211(3): 234–9.
- Kvaskoff M, Whiteman DC, Zhao ZZ et al. Polymorphisms in nevus-associated genes MTAP, PLA2G6, and IRF4 and the risk of invasive cutaneous melanoma. Twin Res Human Genet 2011; 14(5): 422–32.
- Tucker MA, Greene MH, Clark WH Jr et al. Dysplastic naevi on the scalp of prepubertal children from melanoma-prone families. J Pediatr 1983; 103(1): 65–9.
- Fernandez M, Raimer SS, Sanchez RL. Dysplastic naevi of the scalp and forehead in children. Pediatr Dermatol 2001; 18(1): 5–8.
- Gupta M, Berk DR, Gray C et al. Morphologic features and natural history of scalp naevi in children. Arch Dermatol 2010; 146(5): 506–11.
- Aguilera P, Puig S, Guilabert A et al. Prevalence study of naevi in children from Barcelona. Dermoscopy, constitutional and environmental factors. Dermatology 2009; 218(3): 203–14.
- Scope A, Burroni M, Agero AL et al. Predominant dermoscopic patterns observed among naevi. J Cutan Med Surg 2006; 10(4): 170–4.
- Lipoff JB, Scope A, Dusza SW et al. Complex dermoscopic pattern: a potential risk marker for melanoma. Br J Dermatol 2008; 158(4): 821–4.
- Sutton R. An unusual variety of vitiligo (leucoderma acquisitum centrifugum). J Cutan Dis 1916; 34: 797–800.
- Barnhill RL, Rabinovitz H. Benign melanocytic neoplasms: halo nevus. In: J Bolognia, JV Schaffer, KO Duncan, CJ Ko (eds) Dermatology Essentials, 2nd edn. London: Mosby Elsevier, 2008: 1725–6.
- Kolm I, di Stefani A, Hofmann-Wellenhof R et al. Dermoscopy patterns of halo naevi. Arch Dermatol 2006; 142(12): 1627–32.
- Siegel DA, King J, Tai E et al. Cancer incidence rates and trends among children and adolescents in the United States, 2001–2009. Pediatrics. 2014; 134(4): e945–55.
- Campbell LB, Kreicher KL, Gittleman HR et al. Melanoma incidence in children and adolescents: decreasing trends in the United States. J Pediatr 2015; 166(6): 1505–13.
- Lange JR, Palis BE, Chang DC et al. Melanoma in children and teenagers: an analysis of patients from the National Cancer Data Base. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25(11): 1363–8.
- Hamre MR, Chuba P, Bakhshi S et al. Cutaneous melanoma in childhood and adolescence. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2002; 19(5): 309–17.
- Yagerman SE, Chen L, Jaimes N et al. 'Do UC the melanoma?' Recognising the importance of different lesions displaying unevenness or having a history of change for early melanoma detection. Australas J Dermatol 2014; 55(2): 119–24.
- Ferrari A, Bono A, Baldi M et al. Does melanoma behave differently in younger children than in adults? A retrospective study of 33 cases of childhood melanoma from a single institution. Pediatrics 2005; 115(3): 649–54.
- Jafarian F, Powell J, Kokta V et al. Malignant melanoma in childhood and adolescence: report of 13 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005; 53(5): 816–22.
- Linabery AM, Ross JA. Childhood and adolescent cancer survival in the US by race and ethnicity for the diagnostic period 1975–1999. Cancer 2008; 113(9): 2575–96.
-
Saenz NC, Saenz-Badillos J, Busam K et al. Childhood melanoma survival. Cancer 1999; 85(3): 750–4.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990201)85:3<750::AID-CNCR26>3.0.CO;2-5 CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- Menzies SW, Kreusch J, Byth K et al. Dermoscopic evaluation of amelanotic and hypomelanotic melanoma. Arch Dermatol 2008; 144(9): 1120–7.
- Zayour M, Bolognia JL, Lazova R. Multiple Spitz naevi: a clinicopathologic study of 9 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 67(3): 451–8, 8.e1–2.
- Moscarella E, Lallas A, Kyrgidis A et al. Clinical and dermoscopic features of atypical Spitz tumors: a multicenter, retrospective, case-control study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015; 73(5): 777–84.
- Steiner A, Pehamberger H, Binder M, Wolff K. Pigmented Spitz naevi: improvement of the diagnostic accuracy by epiluminescence microscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992; 27(5 Pt 1): 697–701.
- Argenziano G, Scalvenzi M, Staibano S et al. Dermatoscopic pitfalls in differentiating pigmented Spitz naevi from cutaneous melanomas. Br J Dermatol 1999; 141(5): 788–93.
- Pizzichetta MA, Argenziano G, Grandi G et al. Morphologic changes of a pigmented Spitz nevus assessed by dermoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002; 47(1): 137–9.
- Pellacani G, Cesinaro AM, Seidenari S. Morphological features of Spitz naevus as observed by digital videomicroscopy. Acta Dermato-Venereol 2000; 80(2): 117–21.
- Ferrara G, Moscarella E, Giorgio C, Argenziano G. Spitz nevus and its variants. In: G Argenziano, R Hofmann-Wellenhof, R Johr (eds) Color Atlas of Melanocytic Lesions of the Skin. Berlin: Springer, 2007: 151–63.
- Kerner M, Jaimes N, Scope A, Marghoob AA. Spitz naevi: a bridge between dermoscopic morphology and histopathology. Dermatol Clin 2013; 31(2): 327–35.
- Walsh N, Crotty K, Palmer A, McCarthy S. Spitz nevus versus spitzoid malignant melanoma: an evaluation of the current distinguishing histopathologic criteria. Human Pathol 1998; 29(10): 1105–12.
- Suster S. Hyalinizing spindle and epithelioid cell nevus. A study of five cases of a distinctive histologic variant of Spitz's nevus. Am J Dermatopathol 1994; 16(6): 593–8.
- Ferrara G, Argenziano G, Soyer HP et al. The spectrum of Spitz naevi: a clinicopathologic study of 83 cases. Arch Dermatol 2005; 141(11): 1381–7.
- Moscarella E, Al Jalbout S, Piana S et al. The stars within the melanocytic garden: unusual variants of Spitz naevi. Br J Dermatol 2015; 172(4): 1045–51.
- Ferrara G, Zalaudek I, Savarese I et al. Pediatric atypical spitzoid neoplasms: a review with emphasis on 'red' ('spitz') tumors and 'blue' ('blitz') tumors. Dermatology 2010; 220(4): 306–10.
- Ferrara G, Cavicchini S, Corradin MT. Hypopigmented atypical Spitzoid neoplasms (atypical Spitz naevi, atypical Spitz tumors, Spitzoid melanoma): a clinicopathological update. Dermatol Pract Concept 2015; 5(1): 45–52.
- Bastian BC, Wesselmann U, Pinkel D, Leboit PE. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of Spitz naevi shows clear differences to melanoma. J Invest Dermatol 1999; 113(6): 1065–9.
- Harvell JD, Kohler S, Zhu S et al. High-resolution array-based comparative genomic hybridization for distinguishing paraffin-embedded Spitz nevi and melanomas. Diagn Mol Pathol: Am J Surg Pathol B 2004; 13(1): 22–5.
- Bastian BC. Molecular cytogenetics as a diagnostic tool for typing melanocytic tumors. Recent Results Cancer Res 2002; 160: 92–9.
- Roh MR, Eliades P, Gupta S, Tsao H. Genetics of melanocytic naevi. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 2015; 28(6): 661–72.
- van Engen-van Grunsven AC, van Dijk MC, Ruiter DJ et al. HRAS-mutated Spitz tumors: a subtype of Spitz tumors with distinct features. Am J Surg Pathol 2010; 34(10): 1436–41.
- Bastian BC, LeBoit PE, Pinkel D. Mutations and copy number increase of HRAS in Spitz naevi with distinctive histopathological features. Am J Pathol 2000; 157(3): 967–72.
- Bastian BC, LeBoit PE, Hamm H et al. Chromosomal gains and losses in primary cutaneous melanomas detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res 1998; 58(10): 2170–5.
- Wiesner T, He J, Yelensky R et al. Kinase fusions are frequent in Spitz tumours and spitzoid melanomas. Nature Commun 2014; 5: 3116.
- Busam KJ, Kutzner H, Cerroni L, Wiesner T. Clinical and pathologic findings of Spitz naevi and atypical Spitz tumors with ALK fusions. Am J Surg Pathol 2014; 38(7): 925–33.
- Wititsuwannakul J, Mason AR, Klump VR, Lazova R. Neuropilin-2 as a useful marker in the differentiation between Spitzoid malignant melanoma and Spitz nevus. J Am Acad Dermatol 2013; 68(1): 129–37.
- Argenziano G, Zalaudek I, Ferrara G et al. Involution: the natural evolution of pigmented Spitz and Reed naevi? Arch Dermatol 2007; 143(4): 549–51.
- Piccolo D, Ferrari A, Peris K. Sequential dermoscopic evolution of pigmented Spitz nevus in childhood. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 49(3): 556–8.