Chapter 50

Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion

Victoria Briggs

Victoria Briggs

Department of Nephrology, Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust

Search for more papers by this author
James Fotheringham

James Fotheringham

School of Health and Related Research Regent Court, University of Sheffield

Search for more papers by this author
Badri Shrestha

Badri Shrestha

Department of Renal Medicine, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Martin Wilkie

Martin Wilkie

Department of Renal Medicine, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 November 2022

Summary

Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) catheter insertion has a major impact on the uptake of the therapy for two important reasons. Poorly responsive access pathways delay and therefore inhibit access to PD, and poor catheter function increases early technique failure. Mechanical causes of technique failure are a particular problem early in the course of PD, and poor catheter function can prevent patients from getting their chosen dialysis modality. Insertion technique had no evidence of impact on catheter removal, peritonitis, or exit site infection rates following PD catheter insertion. The peritoneoscope allows visualization of the peritoneal cavity, but does not permit manipulation of peritoneal cavity contents and cannot be classed as a variation of laparoscopy. The objective of access pathways is to provide safe and responsive PD access that works. It is important that regular local audit is conducted of PD catheter outcomes and complication rates.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.