Art and Morality
Elizabeth Asmis
Search for more papers by this authorElizabeth Asmis
Search for more papers by this authorPierre Destrée
Search for more papers by this authorPenelope Murray
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
This chapter focuses on the contributions made by Plato, Aristotle, the Stoics, and the Epicureans to the problem of morality in art. It concentrates on poetry as the art that was at the center of debate in antiquity. Starting with Plato's demand that poetry should be both pleasant and morally useful, it discusses how Plato sought to reform poetry in the Republic and Laws to meet this demand. It also suggests that Plato developed a new conception of poetic discourse, as exemplified by his own dialogues, as a way of engaging individuals in a search for morality. Aristotle, it is argued, did not demand moral instruction; instead, he required certain moral principles as a source of pleasure. The Stoics recast the problem by demanding a moral point of view on the part of both author and recipient. In making the recipient responsible for taking a moral position, they laid the foundation of a theory of reception. The Epicureans started by excluding moral instruction and ended, with Lucretius, by viewing moral instruction as essential to the pleasure of poetry.
References
- Asmis, E. 1986. “Psychagogia in Plato's Phaedrus .” Illinois Studies in Classical Philology 11: 153–172.
-
Asmis, E. 1990. “The Poetic Theory of the Stoic ‘Aristo.’” Apeiron 23: 147–201.
10.1515/APEIRON.1990.23.3.147 Google Scholar
- Asmis, E. 1991. “Philodemus's Poetic Theory and On the Good King According to Homer .” Classical Antiquity 10: 1–45.
-
Asmis, E. 1992. “ Plato on Poetic Creativity.” In The Cambridge Companion to Plato, edited by R. Kraut, 338–364. Cambridge.
10.1017/CCOL0521430186.011 Google Scholar
- Asmis, E. 1995. “ Epicurean Poetics.” In Philodemus and Poetry, edited by D. Obbink, 15–34. Oxford. (Originally 1991, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, edited by J. J. Cleary, New York: 63–93). Also reprinted 1996 in Oxford Readings in Ancient Literary Criticism, edited by Andrew Laird, Oxford: 238–266.)
- Belfiore, E. 1984. “A Theory of Imitation in Plato's Republic.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 114: 121–146.
-
Belfiore, E. 1992. Tragic Pleasures; Aristotle on Plot and Emotion. Princeton.
10.1515/9781400862573 Google Scholar
-
Belfiore, E. 2003. “Tragédie, Thumos, et Plaisir esthétique.” Les Etudes philosophiques 67: 451–465.
10.3917/leph.034.0451 Google Scholar
- Bernays, J. 1979. “ Aristotle on the Effect of Tragedy.” In Articles on Aristotle, edited by J. Barnes, M. Schofield, and R. Sorabji. Vol. 4: Psychology and Aesthetics, 154–165. London. (Originally in Abhandlungen der historisch-philosophischen Gesellschaft in Breslau, vol. 1, 1857: 135–202; and Sonderausgabe, Breslau 1857.)
- Burnyeat, M. 1999. Culture and Society in Plato's Republic. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, vol. 20, edited by G.B. Peterson, 217–324. Salt Lake City.
-
Denham, A.E., ed. 2012. Plato on Art and Beauty. New York.
10.1057/9780230368187 Google Scholar
-
Destrée, P. 2003. “Education morale et catharsis tragique.” Les Etudes philosophiques 67: 518–540.
10.3917/leph.034.0518 Google Scholar
- Destrée, P. 2011. “ Poetry, Thumos and Pity in the Republic .” In Plato and the Poets, edited by P. Destrée and F.-G. Herrmann, 267–281. Leiden.
-
Ferrari, G.R.F. 2007. The Cambridge Companion to Plato's Republic. Cambridge.
10.1017/CCOL0521839637 Google Scholar
- Ford, A. 1995. “ Katharsis: The Ancient Problem.” In Performativity and Performance, edited by A. Parker and E.K. Sidgwick, 109–32. New York and London.
-
Ford, A. 2002. The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton.
10.1515/9781400825066 Google Scholar
- Gaut, B. 1996. “ The Ethical Criticism of Art.” In Aesthetics and Ethics, edited by J. Levinson. Cambridge.
-
Gaut, B. 2007. Art, Emotion, and Ethics. Oxford.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263219.001.0001 Google Scholar
-
Golden, L. 1962. “Catharsis.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 93: 51–60.
10.2307/283751 Google Scholar
-
Golden, L. 1969. “Mimesis and Katharsis.” Classical Philology 64: 145–153.
10.1086/365494 Google Scholar
- Golding, N.H. 1975. “Plato as City Planner.” Arethusa 8: 359–371.
-
Graver, M.R. 2007. Stoicism and Emotion. Chicago.
10.7208/chicago/9780226305202.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Halliwell, S. 1986. Aristotle's Poetics. London.
- Halliwell, S. 1988. Plato: Republic 10. Warminster, UK: Aris & Phillips.
- Halliwell, S. 2002. The Aesthetics of Mimesis. Princeton.
-
Laks, A. 2000. The Laws. In The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, edited by C. Rowe and M. Schofield, 258–292. Cambridge.
10.1017/CHOL9780521481366.014 Google Scholar
- Lear, G.R. 2011. “ Mimesis and Psychological Change in Republic III.” In Plato and the Poets, edited by P. Destrée and F.-G. Herrmann, 195–216. Leiden.
- Lear, J. 1992. “ Katharsis.” In Essays on Aristotle's Poetics, edited by A. Rorty, 315–340. Princeton.
- Lessing, G.E. 1767–1768. Hamburgische Dramaturgie. Hamburg.
- Long, A.A. 1992. “ Stoic Readings of Homer.” In Homer's Ancient Readers, edited by R. Lamberton and J.J. Keaney, 41–66. Princeton.
- Menza, V. 1972. “ Poetry and the Techne Theory.” Dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.
-
Meyer, S.S. 2011. “ Legislation as a Tragedy: On Plato's Laws VII, 817b–d.” In Plato and the Poets, edited by P. Destrée and F.-G. Herrmann, 387–402. Leiden.
10.1163/ej.9789004201293.i-434.91 Google Scholar
-
Morrow, G.R. 1960. Plato's Cretan City. Princeton.
10.1515/9780691242859 Google Scholar
- Moss, J. 2007. What Is Imitative Poetry and Why Is It Bad? In The Cambridge Companion to Plato's Republic, edited by G.R.F. Ferrari, 415–444. Cambridge.
- Moss, J. 2012. “ Art and Ethical Perspective: Notes on the Kalon in Plato's Laws.” In Plato on Art and Beauty, edited by A.E. Denham, 205–220. New York.
- Nehamas, A. 1982. “ Plato on Imitation and Poetry in Republic 10.” In Plato on Beauty, Wisdom, and the Arts, edited by J. Moravcsik and P. Temko. Totowa, NJ.
- Nussbaum, M. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge.
- Nussbaum, M. 1993. “ Poetry and the Passions: Two Stoic Views.” In Passions and Perceptions, edited by J. Brunschvig and M. Nussbaum, 97–149. Cambridge.
- D. Obbink, ed. 1995. Philodemus and Poetry. Oxford.
- Porter, J.I. 1994. “Stoic Morals and Poetics in Philodemus.” Cronache Ercolanesi 24: 63–88.
-
Saunders, T.J. 1976. “Notes on Plato as a City Planner.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 23: 23–26.
10.1111/j.2041-5370.1976.tb00347.x Google Scholar
- Singpurwalla, R. 2011. “ Soul Division and Mimesis in Republic X.” In Plato and the Poets, edited by P. Destrée and F.-G. Herrmann, 283–298. Leiden.
- Spaltro, F. 2011. “ Why Should I Dance for Athena? Pyrrhic Dance and the Choral World of Plato's Laws.” Dissertation, University of Chicago.
- Staley, G.A. 2010. Seneca and the Idea of Tragedy. Oxford.
Further Reading
- Several recent collections of papers on Plato include studies of his views on morality in poetry: The Cambridge Companion to Plato's Republic (Ferrari 2007); Plato and the Poets (Destrée and Herrmann 2011); and Plato on Art and Beauty (Denham 2012). Halliwell (1986) offers an excellent introduction to Aristotle's Poetics. The collection of essays in Obbink (1995) is a good starting point for getting to know Philodemus. Information on Stoic aesthetics is scattered in diverse articles; see the references above.