The Sublime
James I. Porter
Search for more papers by this authorJames I. Porter
Search for more papers by this authorPierre Destrée
Search for more papers by this authorPenelope Murray
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
Contrary to current consensus belief, the sublime does not emerge as a literary critical concept only with Caecilius and Longinus. It was already actively informing writers in the rhetorical and critical traditions from the end of the fifth century, and the way was prepared by long traditions in poetry and philosophy starting with Homer and Hesiod. What emerged sometime between the age of Augustus and that of the Antonines was not a new idea but a rebaptizing of an old word (hupsos) along with its cognates and fellow travelers (including sublimis, excelsus, megethos, and magnitudo) as terms of art that could be used to capture pre-existing aesthetic notions and sensibilities. Longinus’ treatise contains clues to these predecessor traditions, which it merely synthesizes. Re-examined in this light, the sublime turns out to have been a broad and widely applicable category of ancient Greek and Roman aesthetics.
References
- Boileau-Despréaux, N. 1966. Œuvres complètes, edited by F. Escal. [Paris].
- A.C. Bowen and R.B. Todd, trans. 2004. Cleomedes, Cleomedes’ Lectures on Astronomy: A Translation of The Heavens. Berkeley.
- Bühler, W. 1964. Beiträge zur Erklärung der Schrift vom Erhabenen. Göttingen.
- Capelle, W. 1912. “[See PDF for text that cannot be displayed in HTML]” Philologus 71: 414–48.
- Chiron, P. 2001. Un rhéteur méconnu: Démétrios (Ps.-Démétrios de Phalére). Essai sur les mutations de la théorie du style à l’époque hellénistique. Paris.
-
Conte, G.B. 2007. “ Anatomy of a Style: Enallage and the New Sublime.” In The Poetry of Pathos: Studies in Virgilian Epic, edited by S.J. Harrison, 58–122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199287017.003.0003 Google Scholar
- T.M. Costelloe, ed. 2012. The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Costil, P. 1949. “ L'esthétique littéraire de Denys d'Halicarnasse.” Dissertation, Paris.
-
de Jonge, C.C. 2012. “Dionysius and Longinus on the Sublime: Rhetoric and Religious Language.” American Journal of Philology 153.2: 271–300.
10.1353/ajp.2012.0016 Google Scholar
-
Dobson, J.F. 1918. “The Posidonius Myth.” The Classical Quarterly 12.4: 179–195.
10.1017/S0009838800012635 Google Scholar
- Grube, G.M.A., ed. 1957a. Longinus, On Great Writing (On the Sublime), translated by G.M.A. Grube. New York.
-
Grube, G.M.A. 1957b. “Notes on the [See PDF for text that cannot be displayed in HTML]” The American Journal of Philology 78.4: 355–374.
10.2307/291724 Google Scholar
- R. Hackforth, ed. 1945. Plato's Philebus. Cambridge.
-
Halliwell, S. 2012. Between Ecstasy and Truth: Interpretations of Greek Poetics from Homer to Longinus. Oxford.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570560.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Hardie, P. 2009. Lucretian Receptions: History, the Sublime, Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Heath, M. 1999. “Longinus, On Sublimity
.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society N.S. 45: 43–74.
10.1017/S0068673500002339 Google Scholar
- Hertz, N. 1983. “A Reading of Longinus.” Critical Inquiry 9.3: 579–596.
-
Hunter, R. 2009. Critical Moments in Classical Literature: Studies in the Ancient View of Literature and Its Uses. Cambridge.
10.1017/CBO9780511729997 Google Scholar
- Innes, D.C. 1985. “ Theophrastus and the Theory of Style.” In Theophrastus of Eresus: On His Life and Work, edited by W.W. Fortenbaugh, P.M. Huby, and A.A. Long, 251–267. New Brunswick.
- Innes, D.C. 2002. “Longinus and Caecilius: Models of the Sublime.” Mnemosyne 55.3: 259–284.
- James I. Porter, The Sublime in Antiquity (CUP 2015).
- Jones, R.M. 1926. “Posidonius and the Flight of the Mind through the Universe.” Classical Philology 21.2: 97–113.
- Kroll, W. 1918. “Die historische Stellung von Horazens Ars poetica .” Sokrates: Zeitschrift für Gymnasialwesen N.S. 6.3/4: 81–98.
- Kühn, J.H. 1941. [See PDF for text that cannot be displayed in HTML] Eine Untersuchung zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Aufschwungsgedankens von Platon bis Poseidonios. Stuttgart.
- Leigh, M. 2006. “ Statius and the Sublimity of Capaneus.” In Epic Interactions: Perspectives on Homer, Virgil, and the Epic Tradition Presented to Jasper Griffin, edited by M.J. Clarke et al, 217–241. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Mazzucchi, C.M., ed. 1992. Dionisio Longino: Del sublime. Milan.
- Michel, A. 1969. “Rhétorique, tragédie, philosophie: Sénèque et le sublime.” Giornale italiano di filologia 21: 245–257.
- Michel, A. 1976. “Rhetorique et poetique: La theorie du sublime de Platon aux modernes.” Revue des Études Latines 54: 278–307.
- Monk, S.H. 1935. The Sublime: A Study of Critical Theories in XVIII-Century England. New York. 2nd expanded edn. 1960, Ann Arbor.
- Mutschmann, H. 1913. Tendenz, Aufbau und Quellen der Schrift vom Erhabenen. Berlin.
-
Neer, R. 2010. The Emergence of the Classical Style in Greek Sculpture. Chicago.
10.7208/chicago/9780226570655.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Norden, E. 1923. Agnostos Theos: Untersuchungen zur formengeschichte religiöser Rede. Leipzig and Berlin.
- O'Sullivan, N. 1992. Alcidamas, Aristophanes, and the Beginnings of Greek Stylistic Theory. Hermes Einzelschriften, vol. 60. Stuttgart.
- Porter, J.I. 1992. “ Hermeneutic Lines and Circles: Aristarchus and Crates on Homeric Exegesis.” In Homer's Ancient Readers: The Hermeneutics of Greek Epic's Earliest Exegetes, edited by R. Lamberton and J.J. Keaney, 67–114. Princeton.
- Porter, J.I. 2001. “ Ideals and Ruins: Pausanias, Longinus, and the Second Sophistic.” In Pausanias: Travel and Memory in Roman Greece, edited by S.E. Alcock, J.F. Cherry, and J. Elsner, 63–92. New York.
- Porter, J.I. 2004. “ Vergil's Voids.” In Before Subjectivity? Lacan and the Classics, edited by J.I. Porter and M. Buchan. Special issue: Helios 31.
-
Porter, J.I. 2006. “ Feeling Classical: Classicism and Ancient Literary Criticism.” In Classical Pasts: The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome, edited by J.I. Porter, 301–352. Princeton.
10.1515/9780691225395-013 Google Scholar
- Porter, J.I. 2007. “ Lucretius and the Sublime.” In The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius, edited by S. Gillespie and P. Hardie, 167–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Porter, J.I. 2010a. The Origins of Aesthetic Thought in Ancient Greece: Matter, Sensation, and Experience. Cambridge.
-
Porter, J.I. 2010b. “Plato and the Platonic Tradition: The Image Beyond the Image.” The Yearbook of Comparative Literature 56.1: 75–103.
10.1353/cgl.2010.0009 Google Scholar
- Porter, J.I. 2011. “ Against [See PDF for text that cannot be displayed in HTML] Rethinking Hellenistic Aesthetics.” In Creating a Hellenistic World, edited by A. Erskine and L. Llewellyn-Jones, 271–312. Swansea.
- Porter, James I. 2015. The Sublime in Antiquity . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Quadlbauer, F. 1958. “Die genera dicendi bis Plinius d. J.” Wiener Studien 71: 55–111.
- Richardson, N.J. 1986. “ Pindar and Later Literary Criticism in Antiquity.” In Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar. Fifth Volume 1985, ed. F. Cairns, 383–401. Liverpool.
- W.R. Roberts, ed. 1899. Longinus, On the Sublime: The Greek Text Edited after the Paris Manuscript, with Introduction, Translation, Facsimiles and Appendices. Cambridge.
- W.R. Roberts, ed. 1902. Demetrius On Style: The Greek Text of Demetrius De elocutione. Cambridge.
- D.A. Russell, ed. 1964. ‘Longinus’ on the Sublime. Oxford.
- Schiesaro, A. 2003. The Passions in Play: Thyestes and the Dynamics of Senecan Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Schrijvers, P.H. 2006. “ Silius Italicus and the Roman Sublime.” In Flavian Poetry, edited by R.R. Nauta, H.-J. v. Dam, and J.J.L. Smolenaars, 97–111. Leiden.
- Shaw, P. 2006. The Sublime. London: Routledge.
- Shuger, D.K. 1984. “The Grand Style and the ‘Genera Dicendi’ in Ancient Rhetoric.” Traditio 40: 1–42.
- Wehrli, F. 1946. “ Der erhabene und der schlichte Stil in der poetisch-rhetorischen Theorie der Antike.” In Phyllobolia für Peter von der Mühll zum 60. Geburtstag am 1. August 1945, edited by O. Gigon, K. Meuli, W. Theiler, F. Wehrli, and B. Wyss, 9–34. Basel.
-
Williams, G.D. 2012. The Cosmic Viewpoint: A Study of Seneca's Natural Questions. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199731589.001.0001 Google Scholar
Further Reading
- The two best articles on the sublime before Longinus remain Wehrli (1946), which is magisterial (though limited by its focus on Democritus and Gorgias as prime movers), and Quadlbauer (1958), which is more diffuse and rapid but covers a great deal of earlier and later ground. Shuger (1984) usefully develops Quadlbauer. An untapped source remains the work of W. Capelle, esp. (1912). Good inroads have recently been made challenging the status quo, mainly in Roman literature in the wake of Lucretius, esp. Michel (1969, 1976), Schiesaro (2003, 22–25, 52–55, 127–135), Porter (2004, 2007), Leigh (2006), Schrijvers (2006), Conte (2007), Hardie (2009), and Williams (2012, esp. 213–230). A handy introduction to the history and theory of the sublime may be found in Shaw (2006), and now the essays gathered in Costelloe (2012). For a more complete and alternative account of the sublime in antiquity see now Porter (2015).