Poetic Inspiration
Penelope Murray
Search for more papers by this authorPenelope Murray
Search for more papers by this authorPierre Destrée
Search for more papers by this authorPenelope Murray
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
Inspiration and craft offer contrasting models of the poet's activity, which also reflect on the nature and function of poetry itself. Ancient literary criticism treats poetry as a technē and analyzes it from that point of view, but the idea of inspiration is indissolubly linked with poetry through the figure of the Muse. Invoked by poets from Homer onwards, the Muse is both a guarantor of poetic authority and an emblem of everything that is outside the poet's control in the production of a poem. In this chapter I discuss the issues of authorship, authority, and value implied by the imagery of inspiration, and the question of how these relate to the making of a poem. The key text is Plato's Ion in which these issues were first, and most influentially, explored.
References
- Acosta-Hughes, Benjamin and Stephens, Susan. 2002. “Rereading Callimachus Aetia fr. 1.” Classical Philology 97: 238–255.
- Acosta-Hughes, Benjamin and Stephens, Susan. 2012. Callimachus in Context: From Plato to the Augustan Poets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Bing, Peter. 2008. The Well-Read Muse: Present and Past in Callimachus and the Hellenistic Poets. Ann Arbor: Michigan Classical Press. First edition, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht 1988.
- Brillante, Carlo. 2009. Il Cantore e la Musa: Poesia e Modelli Culturali nella Grecia Arcaica. Pisa: Edizioni Ets.
- Brink, C.O. 1971. Horace on Poetry: The Ars Poetica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Clare Brown and Don Paterson, eds. 2003. Don't Ask Me What I Mean: Poets in Their Own Words. London: Picador.
- Burke, Seán. 1995. Authorship: From Plato to the Postmodern. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Büttner, Stefan. 2011. “ Inspiration and Inspired Poets in Plato's Dialogues.” In Destrée and Herrmann, 111–129.
- Clark, Timothy. 1997. The Theory of Inspiration. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
- Curtius, Ernst Robert. 1953. European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages, translated by Willard R. Trask. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
-
Pierre Destrée and Herrmann, Fritz-Gregor, eds. 2011. Plato and the Poets. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
10.1163/ej.9789004201293.i-434 Google Scholar
- Fantuzzi, Marco and Hunter, Richard. 2004. Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Finkelberg, Margalit. 1998. The Birth of Literary Fiction in Ancient Greece. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
-
Ford, Andrew. 2002. The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
10.1515/9781400825066 Google Scholar
- Fowler, Don. 2002. “ Masculinity under Threat? The Poetics and Politics of Inspiration in Latin Poetry.” In Spentzou and Fowler, 141–159.
- Fraenkel, Eduard. 1950. Aeschylus: Agamemnon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Halliwell, Stephen. 2011. Between Ecstasy and Truth: Interpretations of Greek Poetics from Homer to Longinus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Heath, Malcolm. 2013. Ancient Philosophical Poetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Janaway, Christopher. 1995. Images of Excellence: Plato's Critique of the Arts. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Liebert, R.S. 2010. “Fact and Fiction in Plato's Ion .” American Journal of Philology 131: 179–218.
-
Lucas, D.W. 1968. Aristotle: Poetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
10.1093/actrade/9780198140245.book.1 Google Scholar
- Maurizio, L. 1995. “Anthropology and Spirit Possession: A Reconsideration of the Pythia's Role at Delphi.” Journal of Hellenic Studies 115: 69–86.
-
Morrison, Andrew. 2011. “ Callimachus’ Muses.” In Brill's Companion to Callimachus, edited by Benjamin Acosta-Hughes, Luigi Lehnus, and Susan Stephens, 329–348. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
10.1163/9789004216976_018 Google Scholar
- Most, Glenn. 2006. Hesiod: Theogony, Works and Days, Testimonia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Murray, Penelope. 1981. “Poetic Inspiration in Early Greece.” Journal of Hellenic Studies 101: 87–100, reprinted in Laird Andrew, ed. Oxford Readings in Ancient Literary Criticism Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, 37–61.
- Murray, Penelope. 1989. “ Poetic Genius and Its Classical Origins.” In Genius: The History of an Idea, edited by Penelope Murray, 9–41. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Murray, Penelope. 1996. Plato on Poetry: Ion, Republic 376e–398b, Republic 595–608b. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Murray, Penelope. 2014. “ The Muses in Antiquity.” In The Muses and their Afterlife in Post-Classical Europe, edited by Kathleen Christian, Clare Guest and Claudia Wedepohl, 13–32. London and Turin: the Warburg Institute and Nino Aragno Editore.
-
Penelope Murray and Peter Wilson, eds. 2004. Music and the Muses: The Culture of Mousike in the Classical Athenian City. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199242399.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Nancy, Jean-Luc. 1996. The Muses, translated by Peggy Kamuf. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Notomi, Noburu. 2011. “ Image-Making in Republic X and the Sophist .” In Destrée and Herrmann, 299–326.
-
Nünlist, René. 1998. Poetologische Bildersprache in der Frühgriechischen Dichtung. Stuttgart and Leipzig: Teubner.
10.1515/9783110968248 Google Scholar
- Rasula, Jed. 2009. Modernism and Poetic Inspiration: The Shadow Mouth. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Rijksbaron, Albert. 2007. Plato, Ion Or: On the Iliad. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
10.1163/ej.9789004163218.i-292 Google Scholar
- John Roe and Michele Stanco, eds. 2007. Inspiration and Technique: Ancient to Modern Views on Beauty and Art. Bern: Peter Lang.
- Rosati, Gianpiero. 2002. “ Muse and Power in the Poetry of Statius.” In Spentzou and Fowler, 229–51.
- Schaper, Eva. 1968. Prelude to Aesthetics. London: Allen and Unwin.
- Scott, Dominic. 2011. “ Plato, Poetry and Creativity.” In Destrée and Herrmann, 131–154.
- Sharrock, Alison. 2002. “ An A-musing Tale: Gender, Genre and Ovid's Battles with Inspiration in the Metamorphoses .” In Spentzou and Fowler, 207–227.
- Spentzou, Efrossini and Fowler, Don, eds. 2002. Cultivating the Muse: Struggles for Power and Inspiration in Classical Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Stern-Gillet, Suzanne. 2004. “On (Mis)interpreting Plato's Ion.” Phronesis 49.2: 169–201.
- Svenbro, Jesper. 1984. La Parola e il Marmo: alle Origini della Poetica Graeca. Turin: Boringhieri. Revised edition of La Parole et le Marbre; aux Origines de la Poétique Grecque. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1976.
- Tarán, Leonardo and Gutas, Dimitri, eds. 2012. Aristotle: Poetics. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
- Tigerstedt, E.N. 1969. “Plato's Idea of Poetical Inspiration.” Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum: Societas Scientiarum Fennica 44.2: 5–76.
-
West, Martin. 2007. Indo-European Poetry and Myth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280759.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Yunis, Harvey. 2011. Plato: Phaedrus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Ziolkowski, Jan. 1990. “ Classical Influences on Medieval Latin Views of Poetic Inspiration.” In Latin Poetry and the Classical Tradition: Essays in Medieval and Renaissance Literature, edited by Peter Godman and Oswyn Murray, 15–38. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Further Reading
- Poetic inspiration is a neglected topic in the history of aesthetics, but Clark (2000) provides a cogent and sophisticated analysis of its importance. The essays in Roe and Stanco (2007) demonstrate the persistence of the idea and its relation to questions of technique from antiquity to the present day. Murray (1981) provides a starting point on poetic inspiration in early Greece, whilst Finkelberg (1998) considers its implications for the conceptualization of poetry at this period. There is also much of relevance in Halliwell (2011). On Plato Tigerstedt (1969) remains fundamental. Stern-Gillet (2004) is excellent on Plato's denial of techneē to the poets, but too dismissive of his concept of inspiration.