Family Complexity and Kinship*
Elizabeth Thomson
University of Wisconsin-Madison and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorElizabeth Thomson
University of Wisconsin-Madison and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Increases in parental cohabitation, separation or divorce, and re-partnering or remarriage have generated an increase in the complexity of family and kinship ties. As a result, many scholars claim that family and kinship have become voluntary, with rights and obligations to be negotiated in the same way as those between friends and neighbors. This essay briefly reviews the demographic trends that have produced complex families and kin, and their projections into the future. It argues that kinship structures arising from stable nuclear family and kin networks provide a template for the organization of more complex family ties. Although a considerable degree of voluntariness can be found in ties among complex families and kin, rights and obligations remain structured in terms of blood and marriage, and are also strongly influenced by periods of coresidence. Guidelines do exist for relationships in complex families and kinship networks, and they can be used to further institutional arrangements that fit the circumstances of increasingly diverse types of families and kin.
References
- Andersson, G. A., & Philipov, D. (2002). Life-table representations of family dynamics in Sweden, Hungary, and 14 other FFS countries: A project of descriptions of demographic behavior. Demographic Research, 7, 67–144.
10.4054/DemRes.2002.7.4 Google Scholar
- Andersson, G. A., Thomson, E., & Duntava, A. (forthcoming). Life-table representations of family dynamics in the 21st century. Demographic Research.
- Arr'anz Becker, O., Salzburger, V., Lois, N., & Nauck, B. (2013). What narrows the stepgap? Closeness between parents and adult (step)children in Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 1130–1148.
- Björnberg, U., & Ekbrand, H. (2008). Financial and practical kin support in Sweden: Normative guidelines and practice. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 39, 73–95.
- Bressan, P., Colarelli, S. M., & Cavalieri, M. B. (2009). Biologically costly altruism depends on emotional closeness among step but not half or full sibling. Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 118–132.
- Brown, S. L., & Manning, W. D. (2009). Family boundary ambiguity and the measurement of family structure: The significance of cohabitation. Demography, 46, 85–101.
- Castrén, A.-M., & Widmer, E. D. (2015). Insiders and outsiders in stepfamilies: Adults' and children's views on family boundaries. Current Sociology, 63, 35–56.
- Cherlin, A. J., & Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. (1994). Stepfamilies in the United States: A reconsideration. Annual Review of Sociology, 20, 359–381.
- Chesley, N., & Poppie, K. (2009). Assisting parents and in-laws: Gender, type of assistance, and couples' employment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 247–262.
- Coleman, M., Ganong, L., & Cable, S. M. (1997). Beliefs about women's intergenerational family obligations to provide support before and after divorce and remarriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 49, 165–176.
- Daatland, S. O. (2007). Marital history and intergenerational solidarity: The impact of divorce and unmarried cohabitation. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 809–825.
- Ganong, L. H., Coleman, M., & Mistina, D. (1995). Normative beliefs about parents' and stepparents' financial obligations to children following divorce and remarriage. Family Relations, 44, 306–316.
- Ganong, L., Coleman, M., McDaniel, A. K., & Killian, T. (1998). Attitudes regarding obligations to assist an older parent or stepparent following later-life remarriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 595–610.
- Goetting, A. (1990). Patterns of support among in-laws in the United States: A review of research. Journal of Family Issues, 11, 67–90.
- Hans, J., Ganong, L., & Coleman, M. (2009). Financial responsibilities toward older stepparents following divorce and remarriage. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 30, 55–66.
10.1007/s10834-008-9137-4 Google Scholar
- Henz, U. (2009). Couples' provision of informal care for parents and parents-in-law: Far from sharing equally? Ageing and Society, 29, 369–395.
- Hogerbrugge, M. J. A., & Dykstra, P. A. (2009). The family ties of unmarried cohabiting and married persons in the Netherlands. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 135–145.
- Hoyt, D. R., & Babchuk, N. (1983). Adult kinship networks: The selective formation of intimate ties with kin. Social Forces, 62, 84–101.
- Kalmijn, M. (2013). Adult children's relationships with married parents, divorced parents, and stepparents: Biology, marriage, or residence? Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 1181–1193.
- Maclean, M. J., Drake, D., & Mckillop, D. (2016). Perceptions of stepfathers' obligations to financially support stepchildren. Journal of Family Economic Issues, 37, 285–296.
- Marsiglio, W. (1992). Stepfathers with minor children living at home – parenting perceptions and relationship quality. Journal of Family Issues, 13, 195–214.
- Maxwell, N., Burton-Chellewa, B., & Dunbarc, R. I. M. (2015). Hamilton's rule predicts anticipated social support in humans. Behavioral Ecology, 26, 130–137.
- Murphy, M. (2011). Effects of the demographic transition on family and kinship networks in Britain. Population and Development Review, 37 (Supplement), 55–80.
- Nock, S. L., Kingston, P. W., & Holian, L. M. (2008). The distribution of obligations. In A. Booth, A. C. Crouter, S. M. Bianchi & J. A. Seltzer (Eds.), Intergenerational caregiving (pp. 279–316). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
- Parsons, T. (1943). The kinship system of the contemporary United States. American Anthropologist, 45, 22–38.
10.1525/aa.1943.45.1.02a00030 Google Scholar
- Perelli-Harris, B., & Sánchez Gassen, N. (2012). How similar are cohabitation and marriage? Legal approaches to cohabitation across Western Europe. Population and Development Review, 38, 435–467.
- Pollet, T. V. (2007). Genetic relatedness and sibling relationship characteristics in a modern society. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 176–185.
- Pollet, T. V., Roberts, S. G. B., & Rim, D. (2013). Going that extra mile: Individuals travel further to maintain face-to-face contact with highly related kin than with less related kin. PLoS One, 8, e53929.
- Reher, D. S. (1998). Family ties in Western Europe: Persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review, 24, 203–234.
- Rossi, A. S., & Rossi, P. H. (1990). Of human bonding: Parent–child relations across the life course. New York, NY: de Gruyter.
- Schmeeckle, M., Giarrusso, R., Feng, D., & Bengtson, V. L. (2006). What makes someone family? Adult children's perceptions of current and former stepparents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 595–610.
- Seltzer, J. A., Lau, C. Q., & Bianchi, S. M. (2012). Doubling up when times are tough: A study of obligations to share a home in response to economic hardship. Social Science Research, 41, 1307–1319.
- Silverstein, M., Conroy, S. J., & Gans, D. (2012). Beyond solidarity, reciprocity and altruism: Moral capital as a unifying concept in intergenerational support for older people. Ageing & Society, 32, 1246–1262.
- Stewart, S. D. (2005). Boundary ambiguity in stepfamilies. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 1002–1029.
- Tanskanen, A. O., & Danielsbacka, M. (2014). Genetic relatedness predicts contact frequencies with siblings, nieces and nephews: Results from the generational transmission in Finland Surveys. Personality and Individual Differences, 60, 5–11.
- Thomson, E. (2014). Family complexity in Europe. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 654, 245–258.
- Thomson, E., Lappegård, T., Carlson, M., Evans, A., & Gray, E. (2014). Childbearing across partnerships in Australia, the United States, Norway and Sweden. Demography, 51, 485–508.
- Wachter, K. W. (1997). Kinship resources for the elderly. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 352, 1811–1817.
- White, L. (2001). Sibling relationships over the life course: A panel analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 555–568.
- White, L., & Reidmann, A. (1992). When the Brady Bunch grows up: Step/half- and fullsibling relationships in adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54, 197–208.
- Wiik, K. A., & Bernhardt, E. (2017). Cohabiting and married individuals' relations with their partner's parents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79, 1111–1124.
Further Reading
- Carlson, M. A., & Meyer, D. R. (2014). Family complexity: Setting the context. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 654, 6–11.
- Ganong, L. H., & Coleman, M. (1999). Changing families, changing responsibilities: Family obligations following divorce and remarriage. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Johnson, C. L. (1990). Perspectives on American kinship in the later 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 623–639.
- Seltzer, J. A., & Bianchi, S. (2013). Demographic change and parent–child relationships in adulthood. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 275–290.
- Widmer, E., Romney, A. K., & Boyd, J. (1999). Cognitive aspects of step-terms in American kinship. American Anthropologist, 101, 374–378.
Citing Literature
Browse other articles of this reference work: