Cooperative Relationships
Abstract
Cooperative relationships arise from a history of mutually beneficial interactions between individuals, and they enable cooperation among a range of entities, including biological organisms, business firms, and nation-states. As one of the simplest of emergent social forms, cooperative relationships can possess higher level properties (e.g., common expectations and rules of interaction, shared communication protocols) that are more than the sum of individual interactions. As such, cooperative relationships can become “things” in their own right, shaping how partners treat each other and how others treat partners within a relationship. Many open questions remain about how the emergent properties of cooperative relationships arise and how they foster future beneficial interactions while mitigating the risk of exploitation. Here, we frame these diverse findings and emerging questions in terms of the inputs and algorithms that partners use in forming models of each other and in guiding behaviors toward each other. We finish by outlining areas ripe for future exploration.
References
- Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596.
- Berkman, L. F., & Glass, T. (2000). Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. Social Epidemiology, 1, 137–173.
10.1093/oso/9780195083316.003.0007 Google Scholar
- Berscheid, E., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (1989). The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 792.
- Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2009). Culture and the evolution of human cooperation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 364, 3281–3288.
- Brent, L. J., Chang, S. W., Gariépy, J. F., & Platt, M. L. (2014). The neuroethology of friendship. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1316, 1–17.
- Brosnan, S. F., Silk, J. B., Henrich, J., Mareno, M. C., Lambeth, S. P., & Schapiro, S. J. (2009). Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) do not develop contingent reciprocity in an experimental task. Animal Cognition, 12, 587–597.
- Burt, R. S. (2009). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Chapais, B. (2009). Primeval kinship: How pair-bonding gave birth to human society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.2307/j.ctv1kz4h57 Google Scholar
- Clark, M. S., & Mils, J. (1993). The difference between communal and exchange relationships: What it is and is not. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 684–691.
- Cords, M., & Aureli, F. (2000). Reconciliation and relationship qualities. In F. Aureli & F. B. M. Waal (Eds.), Natural conflict resolution (pp. 177–198). Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Croft, D. P., James, R., & Krause, J. (2008). Exploring animal social networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Curry, O., Roberts, S. G., & Dunbar, R. I. (2013). Altruism in social networks: Evidence for a ‘kinship premium’. British Journal of Psychology, 104, 283–295.
- De Dreu, C. K. (2012). Oxytocin modulates cooperation within and competition between groups: An integrative review and research agenda. Hormones and Behavior, 61, 419–428.
- Delton, A. W., & Robertson, T. E. (2016). How the mind makes welfare tradeoffs: Evolution, computation, and emotion. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 12–16.
- DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2009). The alliance hypothesis for human friendship. PLoS One, 4, e5802.
- Dunbar, R. I., & Shultz, S. (2010). Bondedness and sociality. Behaviour, 147, 775–803.
- Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 660–679.
- Fehl, K., van der Post, D. J., & Semmann, D. (2011). Co-evolution of behaviour and social network structure promotes human cooperation. Ecology Letters, 14, 546–551.
- Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 63–87.
- Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83.
- Gummerum, M., & Keller, M. (2008). Affection, virtue, pleasure, and profit: Developing an understanding of friendship closeness and intimacy in western and Asian societies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 218–231.
- Hackman, J., Danvers, A., & Hruschka, D. J. (2015). Closeness is enough for friends, but not mates or kin: Mate and kinship premiums in India and US. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 137–145.
- Hackman, J., Munira, S., Jesmin, K., & Hruschka, D. J. (2017). Revisiting psychology mechanisms in the anthropological study of altruism. Human Nature, 28(1), 76–91.
- Hill, K. R., Wood, B. M., Baggio, J., Hurtado, A. M., & Boyd, R. T. (2014). Hunter-gatherer inter-band interaction rates: Implications for cumulative culture. PLoS One, 9, e102806.
- Hinde, R. A. (1976). Interactions, relationships and social structure. Man, 11, 1–17.
- House, B. R., Silk, J. B., Henrich, J., Barrett, H. C., Scelza, B. A., Boyette, A. H., … Laurence, S. (2013). Ontogeny of prosocial behavior across diverse societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 14586–14591.
- Hruschka, D. (2009). Defining cultural competence in context: Dyadic norms of friendship among US high school students. Ethos, 37, 205–224.
- Hruschka, D. J. (2010). Friendship: Development, ecology, and evolution of a relationship (Vol. 5). Berkeley: Univ of California Press.
- Hruschka, D., Hackman, J., & Macfarlan, S. (2015). Why do humans help their friends? Proximal and ultimate hypotheses from evolutionary theory. In V. Zeigler-Hill, L. L. M. Welling & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on social psychology (pp. 255–266). New York, NY: Springer.
10.1007/978-3-319-12697-5_20 Google Scholar
- Hruschka, D. J., & Henrich, J. (2006). Friendship, cliquishness, and the emergence of cooperation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 239, 1–15.
- Jackson, M. O. (2008). Social and economic networks (Vol. 3). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.1515/9781400833993 Google Scholar
- Jaeggi, A. V., & Gurven, M. (2013). Reciprocity explains food sharing in humans and other primates independent of kin selection and tolerated scrounging: A phylogenetic meta-analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 280, 20131615.
- Jones, B., & Rachlin, H. (2006). Social discounting. Psychological Science, 17, 283–286.
- Karremans, J. C., & Aarts, H. (2007). The role of automaticity in determining the inclination to forgive close others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 902–917.
- Kranton, R. E. (1996). Reciprocal exchange: A self-sustaining system. The American Economic Review, 86(4), 830–851.
- Krueger, F., McCabe, K., Moll, J., Kriegeskorte, N., Zahn, R., Strenziok, M., … Grafman, J. (2007). Neural correlates of trust. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 20084–20089.
- Kummer, H. (1978). On the value of social relationships to nonhuman primates: A heuristic scheme. Social Science Information/sur les sciences sociales, 17(4–5), 687–705.
- Leeds, B. A. (2003). Alliance reliability in times of war: Explaining state decisions to violate treaties. International Organization, 57, 801–827.
- Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2007). The architecture of human kin detection. Nature, 445, 727–731.
- McGuire, A. M. (2003). “It was nothing”-Extending evolutionary models of altruism by two social cognitive biases in judgments of the costs and benefits of helping. Social Cognition, 21, 363.
- Milinski, M., Semmann, D., & Krambeck, H.-J. (2002). Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’. Nature, 415, 424–426.
- Niiya, Y., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2010). Acceptability of favor requests in the United States and Japan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 273–285.
- Noë, R., & Hammerstein, P. (1995). Biological markets. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 10, 336–339.
- O'Gorman, R., & Roberts, R. (2017). Distinguishing family from friends: Implicit cognitive differences regarding general dispositions, attitude similarity, and group membership. Human Nature.
- Ohtsubo, Y., Matsumura, A., Noda, C., Sawa, E., Yagi, A., & Yamaguchi, M. (2014). It's the attention that counts: Interpersonal attention fosters intimacy and social exchange. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 237–244.
- Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 483–498.
- Roberts, G. (2005). Cooperation through interdependence. Animal Behaviour, 70, 901–908.
- Roberts, G., & Renwick, J. S. (2003). The development of cooperative relationships: An experiment. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 270, 2279–2283.
- Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404.
- Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2012). The evolutionary origins of friendship. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 153–177.
- Silk, J. B. (2003). Cooperation without counting. Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation, 37–54.
- Silk, J. B. (2014). Evolutionary perspectives on the links between close social bonds, health, and fitness. In M. Weinstein & M. A. Lane (Eds.), Committee on population, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press.
- Silk, J., Cheney, D., & Seyfarth, R. (2013). A practical guide to the study of social relationships. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 22, 213–225.
- Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1996). Friendship and the banker's paradox: Other pathways to the evolution of adaptations for altruism. Proceedings of the British Academy, 88, 119–144.
- Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., Sell, A., Lieberman, D., & Sznycer, D. (2008). Internal regulatory variables and the design of human motivation: A computational and evolutionary approach. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 251–271). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.
- West, S. A., Fisher, R. M., Gardner, A., & Kiers, E. T. (2015). Major evolutionary transitions in individuality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 10112–10119.
- Wiltermuth, S. S., & Heath, C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20, 1–5.
- Xue, M. (2013). Altruism and reciprocity among friends and kin in a Tibetan village. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 323–329.
- Xue, M., & Silk, J. B. (2012). The role of tracking and tolerance in relationship among friends. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 17–25.
Citing Literature
Browse other articles of this reference work: