The Public Nature of Private Property
Abstract
American legal academics describe private property as a set of private rights. However, liberal ideas of private control poorly describe legal practices, and thus the bundle of rights is a misleading metaphor for private property. Indeed, social theorists have long understood that property is not the ownership of a thing or a set of individual rights, but a set of social agreements about what ownership entails. In the late twentieth and early twenty-first century, constituents have expected governments to protect the value in their properties, not just their control over the resources. Property rules involve government intimately not only in creating value but also in determining who deserves which valuable resources.
References
- Alexander, G. S., Peñalver, E. M., Singer, J. W., & Underkuffler, L. (2009). A statement on progressive property. Cornell Law Review, 94, 743–744.
-
Becher, D. (2014). Private property and public power: Eminent domain in Philadelphia. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199322541.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Beckert, J. (2007). Inherited wealth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Blomley, N. (2003). Unsettling the city: Urban property and the politics of land. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Borras, S. M., Jr. Hall, R., Scoones, I., White, B., & Wolford, W. (2011). Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: An editorial introduction. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(2), 209–216.
- Bourdieu, P. (2005). The social structures of the economy. Cambridge, England: Polity.
- Carruthers, B. G., & Ariovich, L. (2004). The sociology of property rights. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 23–46.
- Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- J. Comaroff, & J. L. Comaroff (Eds.) (2006). Law and disorder in the postcolony. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
-
de Soto, H. (2000). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. New York, NY: Basic Books.
10.37199/t40002609 Google Scholar
- de Tocqueville, A., & Reeve, H. (1835). Democracy in America. London, England: Saunders and Otley.
-
Ellickson, R. C. (1991). Order without law: How neighbors settle disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.4159/9780674036437 Google Scholar
- Ellickson, R. C. (1993). Property in land. The Yale Law Journal, 102(6), 1315–1400.
-
Epstein, R. A. (1985). Takings: Private property and the power of eminent domain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.4159/9780674036550 Google Scholar
- Fainstein, S. S. (1995). Urban redevelopment and public policy in London and New York. In P. Healey, S. Cameron, S. Davoudi, S. Graham & A. Madani-Pour (Eds.), Managing cities: The new urban context (pp. 127–143). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Frug, G. E., & Barron, D. J. (2008). City bound: How states stifle urban innovation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Geisler, C. C. (2000). Property pluralism. In C. C. Geisler & G. Daneker (Eds.), Property and values: Alternatives to public and private ownership (pp. 65–86). Washington, DC: Island Press.
- Habermas, J. (1975 [1973]). Legitimation crisis. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
- Hartog, H. (1983). Public property and private power: The corporation of the City of New York in American law, 1730–1870. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
-
Hartog, H. (2012). Someday all this will be yours: A history of inheritance and old age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.4159/harvard.9780674062634 Google Scholar
- Harvey, D. (1982). The limits to capital. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
-
Leavitt, J., & Saegert, S. (1990). From abandonment to hope: Community-households in Harlem. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
10.7312/leav91238 Google Scholar
- Logan, J. R., & Molotch, H. L. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
- Lynd, S. (1987). The genesis of the idea of a community right to industrial property in Youngstown and Pittsburgh, 1977–1987. The Journal of American History, 74(3), 926–958.
- Marx, K., & Fowkes, B. (1977 [1887]). Capital: A critique of political economy. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
- Merry, S. E. (2000). Colonizing Hawaii: The cultural power of law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Molotch, H. L. (1976). The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology, 82(2), 309–332.
- Peñalver, E. M., & Katyal, S. K. (2010). Property outlaws: How squatters, pirates, and protesters improve the law of ownership. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Polanyi, K. (1944). The Great transformation. New York, NY: Farrar & Rinehart.
- Radin, M. J. (1993). Government interests and takings: Cultural commitments of property and the role of political theory. In S. E. Gottlieb (Ed.), Public values in Constitutional Law (pp. 69–96). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
- Radin, M. J. (1996). Contested commodities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Sagalyn, L. B. (2001). Times Square roulette: Remaking the city icon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
-
Singer, J. W. (2000). Entitlement: The paradoxes of property. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.12987/yale/9780300080193.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Stark, D. (1996). Recombinant property in East European Capitalism. American Journal of Sociology, 101(4), 993–1027.
-
Tsing, A. L. (2005). Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
10.1515/9781400830596 Google Scholar
- Underkuffler, L. (1996). Property: A special right. Notre Dame Law Review, 71(5), 1033–1058.
-
Valverde, M. (2012). Everyday law on the street: City governance in an age of diversity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226921914.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Veblen, T. (1945 [1923]). Absentee Ownership and Business Enterprise in Recent Times: The Case of America. New York, NY: Viking Press.
-
Verdery, K. (2003). The vanishing hectare: property and value in postsocialist Transylvania. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10.7591/9781501717253 Google Scholar
- Warner, S. B. (1987). The private city: Philadelphia in three periods of its growth ( 2nd ed.). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Weber, M., Roth, G., & Wittich, C. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Wolford, W., Borras, S. M., Hall, R., Scoones, I., & White, B. (2013). Governing global land deals: The role of the state in the rush for land. Development and Change, 44, 189–210.
-
Zukin, S. (2010). Naked city: The death and life of authentic urban places. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/oso/9780195382853.001.0001 Google Scholar
Citing Literature
Browse other articles of this reference work: