Genetic and Environmental Approaches to Political Science
Peter K. Hatemi
Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
Search for more papers by this authorPeter K. Hatemi
Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Over the past decade, a growing interest in the possibility that biological factors, including genes, might contribute to individual differences in political and social behaviors has emerged. Behavioral genetic techniques have provided a variety of approaches to quantify the effects of genetic and nongenetic inheritance. However, until quite recently, these methods were largely unknown to political scientists. In this essay, we review the general approaches to modeling genetic and social influences on differences in complex human social traits. In so doing, we focus on the “genetics of politics,” including attitudes, ideologies, voting, and partisanship. The emergence of this research reflects a paradigm shift in the study of social traits necessitating the inclusion of biological influences, and recognizing the interdependence of genetic, social, and environmental factors in the development of political behaviors over the life course.
References
- Alford, J. R., Hatemi, P. K., Hibbing, J. R., Martin, N. G., & Eaves, L. J. (2011). The politics of mate choice. Journal of Politics, 73(02), 362–379.
- Benjamin, D. J., Cesarini, D., van der Loos, M. J., Dawes, C. T., Koellinger, P. D., Magnusson, P. K., …, Visscher, P. M. (2012). The genetic architecture of economic and political preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(21), 8026–8031.
-
Boardman, J. D. (2011). Gene-environment interplay for the study of political behaviors. In P. K. Hatemi & R. McDermott (Eds.), Man is by nature a political animal (pp. 185–207). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226319117.003.0006 Google Scholar
- Boardman, J. D., Roettger, M. E., Domingue, B. W., McQueen, M. B., Haberstick, B. C., & Harris, K. M. (2012). Gene–environment interactions related to body mass: School policies and social context as environmental moderators. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 24(3), 370–388.
- Bouchard, T. J., Jr. Lykken, D. T., McGue, M., Segal, N. L., & Tellegen, A. (1990). Sources of human psychological differences: The minnesota study of twins reared apart. Science, 250(4978), 223–228.
- Box, G. E. P., & Draper, N. R. (1987). Empirical model-building and response surfaces. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. Applied probability and statistics. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Dawes, C. T., Cesarini, D., Fowler, J. H., Johannesson, M., Magnusson, P. K. E., & Oskarson, S. (2014). The relationship between genes, personality traits, and political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4 October 2014), 888–903. doi:10.1111/ajps.12100
- Dawes, C. T., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Partisanship, voting, and the dopamine D2 receptor gene. The Journal of Politics, 71(03), 1157–1171.
- Eaves, L. J., & Eysenck, H. J. (1974). Genetics and the development of social attitudes. Nature, 249(454), 288–289.
- Eaves, L. J., & Hatemi, P. K. (2008). Transmission of attitudes toward abortion and gay rights: Effects of genes, social learning and mate selection. Behavior Genetics, 38(3), 247–256.
- Eaves, L. J., & Hatemi, P. K. (2011). Do we choose our spouse based on our in-laws? Resolving the effects of family background and spousal choice for educational attainment, religious practice, and political preference. Social Science Quarterly, 92(5), 1253–1278.
-
Eaves, L. J., Hatemi, P. K., Heath, A. C., & Martin, N. G. (2011). Modeling biological and cultural inheritance. In P. K. Hatemi & R. McDermott (Eds.), Man is by nature a political animal (pp. 101–184). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226319117.003.0005 Google Scholar
- Eaves, L. J., Heath, A. C., Martin, N. G., Maes, H., Neale, M., Kendler, K., & Corey, L. (1999). Comparing the biological and cultural inheritance of personality and social attitudes in the virginia 30,000 study of twins and their relatives. Twin Research, 2, 62–80.
- Fazekas, Z., & Littvay, L. (2012). Choosing sides: The genetics of why we go with the loudest. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 24(3), 389–408.
- Fowler, J. H., Baker, L. A., & Dawes, C. T. (2008). Genetic variation in political participation. American Political Science Review, 102(2), 233–248.
- Fowler, J. & Schreiber, D. (2008). Biology, politics, and the emerging science of human nature. Science, 322(5903), 912–914. doi:10.1126/science.1158188
- Fowler, J. H., & Dawes, C. T. (2008). Two genes predict voter turnout. The Journal of Politics, 70(03), 579–594.
- Fowler, J. H., Dawes, C. T., & Christakis, N. A. (2009). Model of genetic variation in human social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(6), 1720–1724.
- Fowler, J. H., Settle, J. E., & Christakis, N. A. (2011). Correlated genotypes in friendship networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(5), 1993–1997.
- Hatemi, P. K. (2012). The intersection of behavioral genetics and political science: Introduction to the special issue. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 15(01), 1–5.
- Hatemi, P. K. (2013). The influence of major life events on economic policy attitudes in a world of gene-environment interplay. American Journal of Political Science, 57(4), 987–1007.
- Hatemi, P. K., Byrne, E. M., & McDermott, R. (2012). Introduction: What is a ‘gene’ and why does it matter for political science? Journal of Theoretical Politics, 24(3), 305–327.
- Hatemi, P. K., Dawes, C. T., Frost-Keller, A., Settle, J. E., & Verhulst, B. (2011). Integrating social science and genetics: News from the political front. Biodemography and Social Biology, 57(1), 67–87.
- Hatemi, P. K., Eaves, L. J., & McDermott, R. (2012). It's the end of ideology as we know it. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 24(3), 345–369.
- Hatemi, P. K., Funk, C. L., Medland, S. E., Maes, H. M., Silberg, J. L., Martin, N. G., & Eaves, L. J. (2009). Genetic and environmental transmission of political attitudes over a life time. Journal of Politics, 71(3), 1141–1156.
- Hatemi, P. K., Gillespie, N. A., Eaves, L. J., Maher, B. S., Webb, B. T., Heath, A. C., …, Martin, N. G. (2011). A genome-wide analysis of liberal and conservative political attitudes. The Journal of Politics, 73(1), 271–285.
- Hatemi, P. K., Hibbing, J. R., Medland, S. E., Keller, M. C., Alford, J. R., Smith, K. B., …, Eaves, L. J. (2010). Not by twins alone: Using the extended family design to investigate genetic influence on political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 798–814.
- Hatemi, P. K., & McDermott, R. (2012a). The genetics of politics: Discovery, challenges, and progress. Trends in Genetics, 28(10), 525–533.
- Hatemi, P. K., & McDermott, R. (2012b). A neurobiological approach to foreign policy analysis: Identifying individual differences in political violence. Foreign Policy Analysis, 8(2), 111–129.
- Hatemi, P. K., & McDermott, R. (2012c). The political psychology of biology, genetics, and behavior. Political Psychology, 33(3), 307–312.
- Hatemi, P. K., McDermott, R., Eaves, L. J., Kendler, K. S., & Neale, M. C. (2013). Fear as a disposition and an emotional state: A genetic and environmental approach to out-group political preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 57(2), 279–293.
- Hatemi, P. K., Medland, S. E., Morley, K. I., Heath, A. C., & Martin, N. G. (2007). The genetics of voting: An Australian twin study. Behavior Genetics, 37(3), 435–448.
- Hatemi, P. K., Medland, S. E., Robert Klemmensen, R., Oskarrson, S., Littvay, L., Dawes, C. T., …, Martin, N. G. (2014). Genetic influences on political ideologies: Genome-wide findings on three populations, and a mega-twin analysis of 19 measures of political ideologies from five western democracies. Behavior Genetics, 44(3), 282–294. doi:10.1007/s10519-014-9648-8
- Hatemi, P. K., & Verhulst, B. (2015). Political attitudes develop independently of personality traits. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0118106.
- Hibbing, J. R., & Smith, K. B. (2007). The biology of political behavior: An introduction. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 614(1), 6–14.
- Klemmensen, R., Hatemi, P. K., Hobolt, S. B., Petersen, I., Skytthe, A., & Nørgaard, A. S. (2012). The genetics of political participation, civic duty, and political efficacy across cultures: Denmark and the United States. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 24(3), 409–427.
- Lineberry, R. L. (2011). Letter from the former editor. Social Science Quarterly, 92(5), 1133.
- Littvay, L. (2012). Do heritability estimates of political phenotypes suffer from an equal environment assumption violation? Evidence from an empirical study. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 15(1), 6–14.
- Loewen, P. J., & Dawes, C. T. (2012). The heritability of duty and voter turnout. Political Psychology, 33(3), 363–373.
- Martin, N. G., Eaves, L. J., Heath, A. C., Jardine, R., Feingold, L. M., & Eysenck, H. J. (1986). Transmission of social attitudes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 83(12), 4364–4368.
- McDermott, R. (2009). Mutual interests. Political Research Quarterly, 62(3), 571–583.
- McDermott, R., Dawes, C. T., Prom-Wormley, L., Eaves, L., & Hatemi, P. K. (2013). MAOA and aggression: A gene-environment interaction in two populations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 57(6), 1043–1064.
- McDermott, R., Tingley, D., Cowden, J., Frazzetto, G., & Johnson, D. D. (2009). Monoamine oxidase a gene (Maoa) predicts behavioral aggression following provocation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(7), 2118–2123.
- Medland, S. E., & Hatemi, P. K. (2009). Political science, biometric theory, and twin studies: A methodological introduction. Political Analysis, 17(2), 191–214.
- Mondak, J. J., Hibbing, M. W., Canache, D., Seligson, M. A., & Anderson, M. R. (2010). Personality and civic engagement: An integrative framework for the study of trait effects on political behavior. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 85–110.
- Neale, M. C., & Cardon, L. R. (1992). Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Project Foresight (2008) Mental Capital and Wellbeing Project. The Government Office for Science, London. www.bis.gov.uk/foresight
- Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hatemi, P. K., Eaves, L. J., Funk, C., & Hibbing, J. R. (2012). Biology, ideology, and epistemology: How do we know political attitudes are inherited and why should we care? American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 17–33.
- Smith, K. B., & Hatemi, P. K. (2013). OLS is AOK for ACE: A regression-based approach to synthesizing political science and behavioral genetics models. Political Behavior, 35(2), 383–408.
- Verhulst, B., Eaves, L. J., & Hatemi, P. K. (2012). Correlation not causation: The relationship between personality traits and political ideologies. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 34–51.
- Verhulst, B., & Estabrook, R. (2012). Using genetic information to test causal relationships in cross-sectional data. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 24(3), 328–344.
- Verhulst, B., & Hatemi, P. K. (2013). Gene-environment interplay in twin models. Political Analysis, 21(3), 368–389.
- Verhulst, B., Hatemi, P. K., & Martin, N. G. (2010). The nature of the relationship between personality traits and political attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(4), 306–316.
Browse other articles of this reference work: