Spatial Attention
Kyle R. Cave
University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA
Search for more papers by this authorKyle R. Cave
University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Visual perception requires selective filtering. The process of selecting a portion of the visual input according to its location is described as spatial attention. Spatial attention has been measured with a wide variety of experimental techniques, including spatial cuing, spatial probes, distractor interference, ERP, and SSVEP. The results show that spatial attention sometimes takes the form of a gradient, with strong facilitation of processing within a central region and less facilitation and perhaps even inhibition in the surround. The positioning of the attentional gradient is controlled in part by a bottom-up system that directs attention to locations that differ from surrounding locations in basic features. There is also top-down direction of attention, which favors locations with features matching a defined target. A variety of different experiments have demonstrated that attention can be allocated to a particular location in the visual field, but another set of experiments show that attention can be allocated to a visual object, and that attention that is directed to one part of an object can spread to other parts of the same object. It is difficult to determine whether spatial attention and object-based attention are controlled by the same system or by separate systems. Determining the boundaries between different attentional systems should become easier with the use of ERP data to provide precise timing information about attentional processes, and fMRI to localize the brain regions controlling attention and to measure attentional modulation of perceptual processing activity.
References
- Bacon, W. F., & Egeth, H. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485–496.
-
Baddeley, A. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Cave, K. R., & Bichot, N. P. (1999). Visuo-spatial attention: Beyond a spotlight model. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 204–223.
- Cave, K. R., Bush, W. S., & Taylor, T. G. G. (2010). Split attention as part of a flexible attentional system for complex scenes: Comment on Jans, Peters, and De Weerd (2010). Psychological Review, 117, 685–696.
- Cave, K. R., & Zimmerman, J. M. (1997). Flexibility in spatial attention before and after practice. Psychological Science, 8, 399–403.
- Chen, Z. (1998). Switching attention within and between objects: The role of subjective organization. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 7–16.
- Chen, Z. (2012). Object-based attention: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 74, 784–802.
- Chen, Z., & Cave, K. R. (2008). Object-based attention with endogenous cuing and positional certainty. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1435–1443.
- Chen, Z., & Cave, K. R. (2013). Perceptual load vs. dilution: The role of attentional focus, stimulus category, and target predictability. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 327.
- Cohen, M. A., Alvarez, G. A., & Nakayama, K. (2011). Natural-scene perception requires attention. Psychological Science, 22, 1165–1172.
- Corbetta, M., Patel, G., & Shulman, G. L. (2008). The reorienting of the human brain: From environment to theory of mind. Neuron, 58, 306–324.
- Downing, C. J. (1988). Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: Effects on perceptual quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 188–202.
- Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 4, 501–517.
- Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161–177.
- Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.
- Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1974). Selective attention: Noise suppression or signal enhancement? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 587–589.
- Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225–240.
- Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030–1044.
- Goldsmith, M., & Yeari, M. (2003). Modulation of object-based attention by spatial focus under endogenous and exogenous orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 897–918.
- Heinke, D., Mavritsaki, E., Backhaus, A., & Kreyling, M. (2009). The selective attention for identification model (SAIM). In D. Heinke & E. Mavritsaki (Eds.), Computational modelling in behavioral neuroscience (pp. 80–106). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
- Hoffman, J. E., & Nelson, B. (1981). Spatial selectivity in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 283–290.
- Hopf, J. M., Boehler, N., Luck, S. J., Tsotsos, J. K., Heinze, H.-J., & Schoenfeld, M. A. (2006). Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 103, 1053–1058.
- Jans, B., Peters, J. C., & De Weerd, P. (2010). Visual spatial attention to multiple locations at once: The jury is still out. Psychological Review, 117, 637–684.
- Jiang, Y., Costello, P., Fang, F., Huang, M., & He, S. (2006). A gender- and sexual orientation-dependent spatial attention effect of invisible images. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 17048–17052.
- Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175–219.
- Kastner, S., & Pinsk, M. A. (2004). Visual attention as a multilevel selection process. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 483–500.
- Kim, M.-S., & Cave, K. R. (1995). Spatial attention in visual search for features and feature conjunctions. Psychological Science, 6, 376–380.
- Koch, C., & Tsuchiya, N. (2007). Attention and consciousness: Two distinct brain processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 16–22.
- Kyllingsbaek, S., Sy, J. L., & Giesbrecht, B. (2011). Understanding the allocation of attention when faced with varying perceptual load in partial report: A computational approach. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1487–1497.
- LaBerge, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 371–379.
- LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96, 101–124.
- Larsen, A., & Bundesen, C. (1978). Size scaling in visual pattern recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 1–20.
- Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 75–82.
- Li, F. F., VanRullen, R., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2002). Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 9596–9601.
- Luck, S. J., Woodman, G. F., & Vogel, E. K. (2000). Event-related potential studies of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 432–440.
- Mangun, G. R., & Hillyard, S. A. (1995). Mechanisms and models of selective attention. In M. D. Rugg & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition (pp. 41–85). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- Moran, J., & Desimone, R. (1985). Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science, 229, 782–784.
- Mounts, J. R. W. (2000). Evidence for suppressive mechanisms in attentional selection: Feature singletons produce inhibitory surrounds. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 969–983.
- Müller, M. M., Malinowski, P., Gruber, T., & Hillyard, S. A. (2003). Sustained division of the attentional spotlight. Nature, 424, 309–312.
- Olivers, C. N. L., Peters, J., Houtkamp, R., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2011). Different states invisual working memory: When it guides attention and when it does not. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 327–334.
- Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160–174.
- Rijpkema, M., van Aalderen, S. I., Schwarzbach, J. V., & Verstraten, F. A. J. (2008). Activation patterns in visual cortex reveal receptive field size-dependent attentional modulation. Brain Research, 1189, 90–96.
- Sperling, G., & Weichselgartner, E. (1995). Episodic theory of the dynamics of spatial attention. Psychological Review, 102, 503–532.
- Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599–606.
- Treisman, A., & Gelade, T. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
- Tsal, Y., & Benoni, H. (2010). Diluting the burden of load: Perceptual load effects are simply dilution effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1645–1656.
- Wilson, D. E., Muroi, M., & MacLeod, C. M. (2011). Dilution, not load, affects distractor processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 319–335.
-
Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Guided search 4.0: Current progress with a model of visual search. In W. Gray (Ed.), Integrated models of cognitive systems (pp. 99–119). Oxford: New York, NY.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195189193.003.0008 Google Scholar
- Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of a visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 495–501.
- Woodman, G. F., Carlisle, N. B., & Reinhart, R. M. G. (2013). Where do we store the memory representations that guide attention? Journal of Vision, 13, 1–17.
Further Reading
-
Bundesen, C., & Habekost, T. (2008). Principles of visual attention. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570707.001.0001 Google Scholar
- J. Wolfe, & L. Robertson (Eds.) (2012). From perception to consciousness: Searching with Anne Treisman. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Browse other articles of this reference work: