Ambivalence and Inbetweeness
Culture
Culture and Society
First published: 15 May 2015
Abstract
In the following remarks, we present new developments in social theory and cultural analysis that converge in a particular focus on a third perspective beyond the distinction between inside and outside. This focus on “thirdness” transcends the classical structuralist paradigm of binary classification. It is especially sensitive for the analysis of sudden surprises, paradoxical twists, and disturbing events in history and social life and, thus, contrasts to the assumption of progress and orderly linear development. We outline this new paradigm with respect to three different domains: garbage, monsters, and victims.
References
- Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer. Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Boltanski, L. (1999). Distant suffering. Morality, media and politics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
-
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger. An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
10.4324/9780203361832 Google Scholar
- Giesen, B. (2004). Triumph and trauma. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
Further Reading
- Alexander, J. C., Eyerman, R., Giesen, B., Smelser, N. J., & Sztompka, P. (2004). Cultural trauma and collective identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Bataille, G. (1962). Death and sensuality. A study of eroticism and the taboo. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
-
Baudrillard, J. (1990). Seduction. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
10.1007/978-1-349-20638-4 Google Scholar
- Baumann, Z. (1991). Modernity and ambivalence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. London, England: Routledge.
- Caillois, R. (1960). Man and the sacred. New York, NY: Free Press of Glencoe.
- Campbell, J. (1953). The hero with a thousand faces. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
- Caruth, C. (1996). Unclaimed experience. Trauma, narrative, and history. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
- Choderlos de Laclos, P. A. F. (1961). Les Liaisons dangereuses. Paris, France: Garnier.
- Deleuze, G. (1968). Différence et répétition. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.
- Deleuze, G. (1992). The fold. Leibniz and the Baroque. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Derrida, J. (1967). L'écriture et la différence. Paris, France: Editions du Seuil.
- Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Eisenstadt, S. (1982). The axial age: The emergence of transcendental visions and the rise of clerics. European Journal of Sociology, 23(2), 294–314.
- Elias, N. (1969). Die höfische Gesellschaft. Untersuchungen zur Soziologie des Königtums und der höfischen Aristokratie. Luchterhand: Neuwied/Berlin, Germany.
- Foucault, M. (1999). Les Anormaux (1974–1975). Paris, France: Gallimard.
- Freud, S. (1970). Das Unheimliche. In S. Freud (Ed.), Psychologische Schriften. Studienausgabe (pp. 241–274). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Fischer Verlag.
- Freud, S., & Breuer, J. (1997). Studien über Hysterie. Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag: Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
- Giesen, B. (2005). Tales of transcendence: Imagining the sacred in politics. In B. Giesen & D. Suber (Eds.), Religion and politics. Cultural perspectives (pp. 93–137). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill Academic Publishers.
- Girard, R. (1997). Das Heilige und die Gewalt. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Fischer Verlag.
- M. Hagner (Ed.) (1995). Der falsche Körper: Beiträge zu einer Geschichte der Monstrositäten. Göttingen, Germany: Wallstein Verlag.
- Heidegger, M. (1993). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer, Germany.
- Husserl, E. (1996). Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Hamburg, Germany: Meiner.
- Kantorowicz, E. H. (1992). Die zwei Körper des Königs. Eine Studie zur politischen Theologie des Mittelalters. Stuttgart, Germany: Klett-Cotta Verlag.
- Kohl, K. H. (2003). Die Macht der Dinge. Geschichte und Theorie sakraler Objekte. München, Germany: C.H. Beck.
- Koschorke, A., Frank, T., Lüdemann, S., de Mazza, E. M., & von Andreas Kraß, M. (2002). Des Kaisers neue Kleider: Über das Imaginäre politischer Herrschaft. Texte, Bilder, Lektüren. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Fischer Verlag.
-
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 Google Scholar
-
Levine, D. N. (1985). The flight from ambiguity. Essays in social and cultural theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226056210.001.0001 Google Scholar
-
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1958). Anthropologie structurale. Paris, France: Plon.
10.2307/1157643 Google Scholar
- Lévi-Strauss, C. (1964). Mythologiques I. Le Cru et le cuit. Paris, France: Plon.
- Lotman, J. M. (1976). Analysis of the poetic text. Ann Arbor, MI: Ardis.
- Lotman, J. M. (1990). Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture. London, England: Tauris.
- Merton, R. K. (1976). Sociological ambivalence and other essays. New York, NY: Free Press.
- Morris, I. (1975). The nobility of failure: Tragic heroes in the history of Japan. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
- Ortmann, G. (2003). Regel und Ausnahme. Paradoxien. sozialer Ordnung. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp Verlag.
- Otto, R. (2004). Das Heilige. Über das Irrationale in der Idee des Göttlichen und sein Verhältnis zum Rationalen. München, Germany: C.H. Beck.
- Quine, W. V. O. (1969). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Rank, O. (1909). Der Mythus von der Geburt des Helden: Versuch einer psychologischen Mythendeutung. Wien, Austria: Deuticke.
- Rickert, H. (1926). Kulturwissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft. Tübingen, Germany: Mohr Siebeck.
- Ricoeur, P. (1986). The symbolism of evil. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
- Schütz, A. (1988). Strukturen der Lebenswelt Bd.1. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
- Schütz, A. (2004). Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt. Konstanz, Germany: UVK.
- Serres, M. (1980). Le Parasite. Paris, France: Grasset.
-
Shilling, C. (2003). The body and social theory. London, England: Sage.
10.4135/9781446215470 Google Scholar
- Simmel, G. (1908). Soziologie. Leipzig, Germany: Dunker und Humblot.
- Simmel, G. (1996). Die Koketterie. In Hauptprobleme der Philosophie. Gesammelte Aufsätze 14 (pp. 256–277). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
-
Smelser, N. J. (1998a). The social edges of psychoanalysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.1525/9780520921375 Google Scholar
- Smelser, N. J. (1998b). The rational and the ambivalent in the social sciences: 1997 Presidential Address. American Sociological Review, 63, 1–16.
-
Szakolczai, A. (2000). Reflexive historical sociology. London, England: Routledge.
10.4324/9780203193617 Google Scholar
- Thompson, M. (1979). Rubbish theory. The creation and destruction of value. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- Turner, V. W. (1967). Betwixt and between. The liminal period in Rites de Passage. In V. W. Turner (Ed.), The forest of symbols. Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Turner, V. W. (1982). From ritual to theatre. The human seriousness of play. New York, NY: PAJ Publications.
- Turner, V. (1995). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
- Weber, M. (1988). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen, Germany: Mohr Siebeck.
- White, H. V. (1973). Metahistory: The historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Wittgenstein, L. (2003). Philosophische Untersuchungen. Suhrkamp Verlag: Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Browse other articles of this reference work: