Intergroup Contact in Action
Using Intergroup Contact Interventions to Change Children's Out-Group Orientation
Lindsey Cameron
Search for more papers by this authorNicola Abbott
Search for more papers by this authorLindsey Cameron
Search for more papers by this authorNicola Abbott
Search for more papers by this authorAdam Rutland
Search for more papers by this authorDrew Nesdale
Search for more papers by this authorChristia Spears Brown
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
This chapter focuses on the strengths and weaknesses of intergroup contact interventions designed to change children's out-group orientation. It considers a number of approaches to intergroup contact that are among the most commonly used in the field, and have been systematically evaluated in real-world settings. These approaches incorporate the principles of Allport's contact hypothesis and more recent psychological findings. Emerging perspectives in social and developmental psychology suggest possible points for considerations in the development of contact interventions. It is important to consider the extent to which intergroup contact interventions are representative of how young people experience out-groups in the real world. The majority of intergroup contact research typically examines contact between two groups, usually a majority and minority status group. In order to better reflect young people's experience of diversity, future research should develop and test contact interventions that bring together young people from a variety of groups.
References
- Abbott, N., & Cameron, L. (2014). What makes a young assertive bystander? The effect of intergroup contact, empathy, cultural openness, and in-group bias on assertive bystander intervention intentions. Journal of Social Issues, 70(1), 167–182.
- Aboud, F. E., Mendelson, M. J., & Purdy, K. T. (2003). Cross-race peer relations and friendship quality. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 165–173.
- Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.
- Aron, A., Melinat, E., Aron, E. N., Vallone, R., & Bator, R. (1997). The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 363–377.
- Bigler, R., & Hughes, J. M. (2010). Reasons for scepticism about the efficacy of simulated social contact interventions. American Psychologist, 65(2), 132–133.
- Bratt, C. (2008). The jigsaw classroom under test: No effect on intergroup relations evident. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 403–419.
- Brown, R. (2010). Prejudice: Its social psychology ( 2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Cameron, L., & Rutland, A. (2008). An integrative approach to changing children's intergroup attitudes. In S. Levy & M. Killen (Eds.), Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood (pp. 191–203). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Cameron, L., Rutland, A., Hossain, R., & Petley, R (2011). When and why does extended contact work? The role of high quality direct contact and group norms in the development of positive ethnic intergroup attitudes amongst children. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 193–206.
- Cameron, L., Rutland, A., Turner, R.N., Blake, B., Holman-Nicolas, R., Powell, C. (2011). Changing attitudes with a little imagination: Imagined contact effects on young children's intergroup bias. Anale de Psicologia, 27, 708–717.
-
Cameron, L., & Turner, R. N. (2010). The applications of diversity-based interventions to reduce prejudice. In R. J. Crisp (Ed.), The psychology of social and cultural diversity (pp. 322–352). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
10.1002/9781444325447.ch14 Google Scholar
- Cernat, V. (2011). Extended contact effects: Is exposure to positive out-group exemplars sufficient or is interaction with in-group members necessary? Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 737–753.
- Cole, C. F., Arafat, C., Tidhar, C., Tafesh, W. Z., Fox, N. A., Killen, M. …Yung, F. (2003). The educational impact of Rechov Sumsum/Sahra'a Simsim: A Sesame Street television series to promote respect and understanding among children living in Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 409–422.
- Crisp, R. J., Husnu, S., Meleady, R., Stathi, S., & Turner, R. N. (2010). From imagery to intention: A dual route model of imagined contact effects. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 188–236.
- Crisp, R., & Turner, R. (2009). Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated contact. American Psychologist, 64, 231–240.
-
Cummings, S. M., Williams, M. M., & Ellis, R. A. (2002). Impact of an intergenerational program on 4th graders’ attitudes toward elders and school behaviors. Journal of Human Behavior, 6, 91–107.
10.1300/J137v06n03_06 Google Scholar
- Davies, K., Tropp, L. R., Aron, A., Pettigrew, T., & Wright, S. C. (2011). Cross-group friendships and intergroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 332– 351.
- Dixon, J., Durrheim, K., Tredoux, C., Tropp, L., Clack, B., & Eaton, L. (2010). A paradox of integration? Interracial contact, prejudice reduction and perceptions of racial discrimination. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 401–416.
- Eller, A., Abrams, D., & Gomez, A. (2012). When the direct route is blocked: The extended contact pathway to improving intergroup relations. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 637–646.
- Feddes, A. R., Noack, P., & Rutland, A. (2009). Direct and extended friendship effects on minority and majority children's interethnic attitudes: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 80, 377–390.
- Gomez, A., & Huici, C. (2008). Vicarious intergroup contact and the role of authorities in prejudice reduction. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 103–114.
- Gomez, A., Tropp, L. R., & Fernandez, S. (2011). When extended contact opens the door to future contact: Testing the effects of extended contact on attitudes and intergroup expectancies in majority and minority groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14, 161–173.
- Graves, S. B. (1999). Television and prejudice-reduction: When does television as a vicarious experience make a difference? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 707–727.
- Jackson, M. F., Barth, J. M., Powell, N., & Lochman, J. E. (2006). Classroom contextual effects on children's peer nominations. Child Development, 77, 1325–1337.
- Johnson, P. J., & Aboud, F. E. (2013). Modifying ethnic attitudes in young children: The impact of communicator race and message strength. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 37, 182–191.
- Joyce, N., & Harwood, J. (2012). Improving intergroup attitudes through televised vicarious intergroup contact: Social cognitive processing of in-group and out-group information. Communication Research, 41, 627–641.
- Jugert, P., Noack, P., & Rutland, A. (2011). Friendship preferences among German and Turkish preadolescents. Child Development, 82, 812–829.
- Levine, M., & Dixon, J. (2012). Conclusions and future directions: The nature, significance and inherent limitations of the concept of prejudice in social psychology. In J. Dixon & M. Levine (Eds.) Beyond prejudice: Extending the Social Psychology of Conflict, Inequality and Social Change (pp. 303–331). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Liebkind, K., & McAlister, A. (1999). Extended contact through peer modelling to promote tolerance in Finland. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 765–780.
- Maras, P., & Brown, R. (1996). Effects of contact on children's attitudes towards disability: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 2113–2134.
- Mazziotta, A., Mummendey, A., & Wright, S. C. (2011). Vicarious intergroup contact effects: Applying social-cognitive theory to intergroup contact research. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 255–274.
- Miles, E., & Crisp, R. J. (2014). A meta-analytic test of the imagined contact hypothesis. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17, 3–26.
- Page-Gould, E., Medoza-Denton, R., & Tropp, L. (2008). With a little help from my cross-group friend: Reducing anxiety in intergroup contexts through cross-group friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1080–1094.
- Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.
- Pettigrew, T. F., Tropp, L. R., Wagner, U., & Christ, O. (2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 271–280.
- Stathi, S., & Crisp, R. J. (2008). Imagining intergroup contact promotes projection to outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 943–957.
- Tausch, N., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J. B., Psaltis, C., Schmid, K., Popan, J., Cairns, E., & Hughes, J. (2010). Secondary transfer effect of intergroup contact: Alternative accounts and underlying processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 282–302.
- Tropp, L. R., O'Brien, T. C., & Migacheva, K. (2014). How peer norms of inclusion and exclusion predict children's interest in cross-ethnic friendships. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 151–166.
- Tropp, L. R., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2005). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16, 951–957.
- Tropp, L., & Prenovost, M. (2008). The role of intergroup contact in predicting children's inter-ethnic attitudes: Evidence from meta analytic and field studies. In S. R. Levy, & M. Killen (Eds.), Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood (pp. 236–248). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Turner, R. N., Hewstone, M., & Voci, A. (2007). Reducing explicit and implicit out-group prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 369–388.
- Turner, R. N., Hewstone, M., & Voci, A. (2007). Reducing explicit and implicit prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 369–388.
- Turner, R. N., Hewstone, M., Voci, A., & Vonofakou, C. (2008). A test of the extended intergroup contact hypothesis: The mediating role of intergroup anxiety, perceived in-group and out-group norms, and inclusion of the out-group in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 843–860.
- Vezzali, L., Capozza, D., Giovannini, D., & Stathi, S. (2011). Improving implicit and explicit intergroup attitudes using imagined contact: An experimental intervention with elementary school children. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 15, 203–212.
- Vezzali, L., Giovannini, D., & Capozza, D. (2010). Longitudinal effects of contact on intergroup relations: The role of majority and minority group membership and intergroup emotions. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 20, 462–479.
- Vezzali, L., Stathi, S., & Giovannini, D. (2012). Improving adolescents’ attitudes and behavioral intentions toward immigrants. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 148–162.
- West, K., Holmes, E., & Hewstone, M. (2011). Enhancing imagined contact to reduce prejudice against people with schizophrenia. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14, 407–428.
- White, F. A., & Abu-Rayya, H. M. (2012). A dual identity-electronic (DIEC) experiment promoting short- and long-term harmony. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 597–608.
- Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., & Ropp, S. A (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73–90.