Contact Strategies for Improving Intergroup Relations among Youth
Linda R. Tropp
Search for more papers by this authorAnanthi Al Ramiah
Search for more papers by this authorLinda R. Tropp
Search for more papers by this authorAnanthi Al Ramiah
Search for more papers by this authorAdam Rutland
Search for more papers by this authorDrew Nesdale
Search for more papers by this authorChristia Spears Brown
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
This chapter reviews classic and contemporary perspectives on intergroup contact, with a particular focus on research demonstrating the positive effects of intergroup contact among children and adolescents. It describes the ways in which individuals categorize themselves as group members, and how these categorizations can influence their experiences in intergroup contexts. The chapter emphasizes inclusive forms of categorization such as recategorization, and the powerful role recategorization can play in shaping intergroup attitudes. Optimal conditions for intergroup contact typically include: establishing equal status between groups within the contact situation; encouraging the groups to interact in a cooperative manner; having the groups work together toward common goals, and ensuring that the contact between groups is supported by institutional authorities, laws, or customs. Research evidence demonstrating the importance of these optimal conditions comes from meta-analytic and empirical studies. The chapter discusses some key roles that subjective, emotional processes play in intergroup contact effects.
References
- Aboud, F. E., & Levy, S. R. (2000). Interventions to reduce prejudice and discrimination in children and adolescents. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 269–293). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Aboud, F. E., Mendelson, M. J., & Purdy, K. T. (2003). Cross-race peer relations and friendship quality. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 165–173.
- Aboud, F., Tredoux, C., Tropp, L. R., Brown, C., Niens, U., & Noor, N. (2012). Interventions to reduce prejudice and enhance inclusion and respect for ethnic differences in early childhood: A systematic review. Developmental Review, 32, 307–336.
- Abrams, D. (2011). Wherein lies children's intergroup bias? Egocentrism, social understanding, and social projection. Child Development, 82(5), 1579–1593.
-
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1990). Social identification, self-categorization, and social influence. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 195–228.
10.1080/14792779108401862 Google Scholar
- Abrams, D., & Killen, M. (2014). Social exclusion of children: Developmental origins of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 1–11.
- Abrams, D., Rutland, A., & Cameron, L. (2003). The development of subjective group dynamics: Children's judgments of normative and deviant in-group and out-group individuals. Child Development, 74(6), 1840–1856.
- Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Al Ramiah, A., & Hewstone, M. (2012). “Rallying around the flag”: Can an intergroup contact intervention promote national unity? British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 239–256.
- Al Ramiah, A., Hewstone, M., Little, T., & Lang, K. (2013). The influence of status on the relationship between intergroup contact, threat and prejudice in the context of a nation-building intervention in Malaysia. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 58, 1202–1229.
- Al Ramiah, A., Hewstone, M., Voci, A., Cairns, E., & Hughes, J. (2013). It's never too late for “us” to meet “them”: Prior intergroup friendship moderates the impact of later intergroup friendship in educational settings. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 57–75.
- Al Ramiah, A., Schmid, K., & Hewstone, M. (2014). Why are all the Asian (White) kids sitting together in the cafeteria? British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(1), 100–124.
- Aronson, E., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., Blaney, N., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Barlow, F. K., Paolini, S., Pedersen, A., Hornsey, M. J., Radke, H. R. M., Harwood, J., Sibley, C. G. (2012). The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1629–1643.
- Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., Maquil, A., Demoulin, S., & Leyens, J.-P. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis amongst majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 843–856.
- Brown, K. T., Brown, T. N., Jackson, J. S., Sellers, R. M., & Manuel, W. J. (2003). Teammates on and off the field? White student athletes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 1379–1403.
- Cameron, L., Rutland, A., Brown, R., & Douch, R. (2006). Changing children's intergroup attitudes toward refugees: Testing different models of extended contact. Child Development, 77, 1208–1219.
- Christ, O., Schmid, K., Lolliot, S., Swart, H., Stolle, D., Tausch, N., … Hewstone. M. (2014). Contextual effect of positive intergroup contact on out-group prejudice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 111, 3996–4000. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320901111
- de Tezanos-Pinto, P., Brown, R., & Bratt, C. (2010). What will the others think? In-group norms as a mediator of intergroup contact. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(3), 507–523.
- Devine, P. G., & Vasquez, K. A. (1998). The rocky road to positive intergroup relations. In J. L. Eberhardt & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Confronting racism: The problem and the response (pp. 234–262). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Niemann, Y. F., & Snider, K. (2002). Racial, ethnic, and cultural differences in responding to distinctiveness and discrimination on campus: Stigma and common group identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 167–188.
- Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Saguy, T. (2009). Commonality and the complexity of “we”: Social attitudes and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 3–20.
- Ellison, C., & Powers, D. (1994). The contact hypothesis and racial attitudes among black Americans. Social Science Quarterly, 75, 385–400.
- Feddes, A. R., Noack, P., & Rutland, A. (2009). Direct and extended friendship effects on minority and majority children's intergroup attitudes: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 80, 377–390.
- Fischer, M. J. (2011). Interracial contact and changes in the racial attitudes of White college students. Social Psychology of Education, 14, 547–574.
- Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common in-group identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
- Gaertner, S. L., Rust, M. C., Dovidio, J. F., Bachman, B. A., & Anastasio, P. A. (1994). The contact hypothesis: The role of a common in-group identity on reducing intergroup bias. Small Groups Research, 25, 224–249.
- Gómez, A., Tropp, L. R., & Fernandez, S. (2011). When extended contact opens the door to future contact: Testing the effects of extended contact on intergroup attitudes and expectancies among minority and majority groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14, 161–173.
- Guerra, R., Rebelo, M., Monteiro, M. B., Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2010). How should intergroup contact be structured to reduce bias among majority and minority group children? Group Processes Intergroup Relations, 13, 445–460.
- Hallinan, M. T., & Smith, S. S. (1985). The effects of classroom racial composition on students’ interracial friendliness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 3–16.
- Hughes, D., Rodriguez J, Smith EP, Johnson DJ, Stevenson HC, & Spicer P. (2006). Parents'ethnic-racial socialization practices: a review of research and directions for future study. Developmental Psychology, 42, 747–70.
- Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Quantitative synthesis of social psychological research. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 496–528). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Jugert, P., Noack, P., & Rutland, A. (2011). Friendship preferences among German and Turkish preadolescents. Child Development, 82(3), 812–829.
- Killen, M., Crystal, D., & Ruck, M. (2007). The social developmental benefits of intergroup contact for children and adolescents. In E. Frankenberg & G. Orfield (Eds.), Realizing the promise of diversity in American schools (pp. 57–73). Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
- Levin, S., Van Laar, C., & Sidanius, J. (2003). The effects of in-group and out-group friendships on ethnic attitudes in college: A longitudinal study. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 76–92.
- Maoz, I. (2002). Conceptual mapping and evaluation of peace education programs: The case of education for coexistence through intergroup encounters between Jews and Arabs in Israel. In G. S. B. Nevo (Ed.), Peace education: The concept, principles, and practices around the world (pp. 259–267). Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Mazziotta, A., Mummendey, A., & Wright, S. C. (2011). Vicarious intergroup contact effects: Applying social-cognitive theory to intergroup contact research. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14(2), 255–274.
- Molina, L. E., & Wittig, M. A. (2006). Relative importance of contact conditions in explaining prejudice reduction in a classroom context: Separate and equal? Journal of Social Issues, 62, 489–509.
- Page-Gould, E., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). With a little help from my cross-group friend: Reducing anxiety in intergroup contexts through cross-group friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1080–1094.
- Paolini, S., Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., & Voci, A. (2004). Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 770–786.
- Pettigrew, T. F., Christ, O., Wagner, U., & Stellmacher, J. (2007). Direct and indirect intergroup contact effects on prejudice: A normative interpretation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31, 411–425.
- Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.
- Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922–934.
- Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2011). When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
-
Quintana, S. (2011). Ethnicity, race, and children's social development. In P.K. Smith & C.H. Hart (Eds.), Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood social development (pp. 299–316). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
10.1002/9781444390933.ch16 Google Scholar
- S. Quintana, & C. McKown (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of race, racism, and the developing child. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
- Raabe, T., & Beelmann, A. (2011). Development of ethnic, racial, and national prejudice in childhood and adolescence: A multinational meta-analysis of age differences. Child Development, 82, 1715–1737.
- Shelton, J. N., & Richeson, J. A. (2005). Intergroup contact and pluralistic ignorance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 91–107.
- Slavin, R. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50, 315–342.
- Stephan, W. G., Diaz-Loving, R., & Duran, A. (2000). Integrated threat theory and intercultural attitudes: Mexico and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 240–249.
- Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejuice and discrimination (pp. 23–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
-
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2001). Improving intergroup relations. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
10.4135/9781452229225 Google Scholar
- Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., & Morrison, K. R. (2009). Intergroup threat theory. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 43–59). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Swart, H., Hewstone, M., Christ, O., & Voci, A. (2011). Affective mediators of intergroup contact: A longitudinal analysis in South Africa. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1221–1238. doi:10.1037/a0024450
- Tal-Or, N., Boninger, D., & Gleicher, F. (2002). Understanding the conditions and processes necessary for intergroup contact to reduce prejudice. In G. S. B. Nevo (Ed.), Peace education: The concept, principles, and practices around the world (pp. 89–108). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Tausch, N., Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J., & Cairns, E. (2007). Individual-level and group-level mediators of contact effects in Northern Ireland: The moderating role of social identification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 541–556.
- Tropp, L. R. (2006). Stigma and intergroup contact among members of minority and majority status groups. In S. Levin & C. Laar (Eds.), Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 171–191). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Tropp, L. R., & Bianchi, R. A. (2006). Valuing diversity and interest in intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 533–551.
- Tropp, L. R., O'Brien, T., & Migacheva, K. (2014). How peer norms of inclusion and exclusion predict children's interest in cross-ethnic friendships. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 151–166.
- Tropp, L. R., & Prenovost, M. (2008). The role of intergroup contact in predicting interethnic attitudes: Evidence from meta-analytic and field studies. In S. Levy and M. Killen (Eds.), Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood (pp. 236–248). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Turner, R. N., Hewstone, M., & Voci, A. (2007). Reducing explicit and implicit out-group prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 369–388.
- Turner, R. N., Hewstone, M., Voci, A., & Vonofakou, C. (2008). A test of the extended intergroup contact hypothesis: The mediating role of intergroup anxiety, perceived ingroup and outgroup norms, and inclusion of the outgroup in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 843–860.
- Verkuyten, M. (2006). Ethnic peer victimization and psychological well-being among early adolescents. In X. Chen, D. C. French, & B. H. Schneider (Eds.), Peer relationships in cultural context (pp. 339–363). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Wood, P. B., & Sonleitner, N. (1996). The effect of childhood interracial contact on adult antiblack prejudice. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 1–17.
- Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., & Ropp, S. A. (1997). The extended contact effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73–90.
- Wright, S. C., & Tropp, L. R. (2005). Language and intergroup contact: Investigating the impact of bilingual instruction on children's intergroup attitudes. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 309–328.