Instrumentation and Surgical Technique
Postoperative Imaging Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Aditya Bagrodia
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
Search for more papers by this authorMargaret S. Pearle
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAditya Bagrodia
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
Search for more papers by this authorMargaret S. Pearle
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
Search for more papers by this authorManoj Monga MD, FACS
Director
Stevan B. Streem Center for Endourology and Stone Disease, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, OH, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAbhay Rane MS, FRCS(Urol)
Professor of Urology
East Surrey Hospital, Redhill, UK
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
The goal of imaging after percutaneous nephrolithotomy is to assure complete stone removal and anterograde urinary drainage and to identify potential complications. Computed tomography offers the most sensitive and specific modality for detecting residual stone fragments and readily detects perinephric hematomas or injuries to surrounding organs. The role of antegrade nephrostogram is controversial but it provides some assurance of the absence of distal obstruction prior to nephrostomy tube removal. Routine immediate postoperative chest radiography is not necessary for the diagnosis of clinically significant hydropneumothorax but clinical suspicion should guide the need for postoperative chest imaging. Intermediate and long-term imaging is aimed at detecting stone recurrences and the frequency and type of imaging are dictated by the metabolic activity of the individual patient.
References
- Beck EM, Riehle RA Jr. The fate of residual fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy of infection stones. J Urol 1991; 145: 6.
- Graff J, Diederichs W, Schulze H. Long-term followup in 1,003 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy patients. J Urol 1988; 140: 479.
- Park J, Hong B, Park T, et al. Effectiveness of noncontrast computed tomography in evaluation of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2007; 21: 684.
- Pearle MS, Watamull LM, Mullican MA. Sensitivity of noncontrast helical computerized tomography and plain film radiography compared to flexible nephroscopy for detecting residual fragments after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 1999; 162: 23.
- Streem SB, Yost A, Mascha E. Clinical implications of clinically insignificant stone fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 1996; 155: 1186.
- Buchholz NP, Meier-Padel S, Rutishauser G. Minor residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: spontaneous clearance or risk factor for recurrent stone formation? J Endourol 1997; 11: 227.
- Osman MM, Alfano Y, Kamp S, et al. 5-year-follow-up of patients with clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Eur Urol 2005; 47: 860.
- Khaitan A, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, et al. Post-ESWL, clinically insignificant residual stones: reality or myth? Urology 2002; 59: 20.
- El-Nahas AR, El-Assmy AM, Madbouly K, et al. Predictors of clinical significance of residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones. J Endourol 2006; 20: 870.
- Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Gupta A, et al. Natural history of residual fragments following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 2009; 181: 1163.
- Ganpule A, Desai M. Fate of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a critical analysis. J Endourol 2009; 23: 399.
- Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Bensalah K, et al. Residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: cost comparison of immediate second look flexible nephroscopy versus expectant management. J Urol 2010; 183: 188.
- Park S, Pearle MS. Imaging for percutaneous renal access and management of renal calculi. Urol Clin North Am 2006; 33: 353.
- Roth CS, Bowyer BA, Berquist TH. Utility of the plain abdominal radiograph for diagnosing ureteral calculi. Ann Emerg Med 1985; 14: 311.
- Mutgi A, Williams JW, Nettleman M. Renal colic. Utility of the plain abdominal roentgenogram. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151: 1589.
- Jackman SV, Potter SR, Regan F, et al. Plain abdominal x-ray versus computerized tomography screening: sensitivity for stone localization after nonenhanced spiral computerized tomography. J Urol 2000; 164: 308.
- Boyd R, Gray AJ. Role of the plain radiograph and urinalysis in acute ureteric colic. J Accid Emerg Med 1996; 13: 390.
- Denstedt JD, Clayman RV, Picus DD. Comparison of endoscopic and radiological residual fragment rate following percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. J Urol 1991; 145: 703.
- Gaucher O, Cormier L, Deneuville M, et al. [Which is the best performing imaging method for demonstrating residual renal calculi?] Prog Urol 1998; 8: 493.
- Waldmann TB, Lashley DB, Fuchs EF. Unenhanced computerized axial tomography to detect retained calculi after percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy. J Urol 1999; 162: 312.
- Osman Y, El-Tabey N, Refai H, et al. Detection of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: role of nonenhanced spiral computerized tomography. J Urol 2008; 179: 198.
- Ferrandino MN, Bagrodia A, Pierre SA, et al. Radiation exposure in the acute and short-term management of urolithiasis at 2 academic centers. J Urol 2009; 181: 668.
- Poletti PA, Platon A, Rutschmann OT, et al. Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 927.
- Zilberman DE, Tsivian M, Lipkin ME, et al. Low dose computerized tomography for detection of urolithiasis – its effectiveness in the setting of the urology clinic. J Urol 2011; 185: 910.
- Memarsadeghi M, Heinz-Peer G, Helbich TH, et al. Unenhanced multi-detector row CT in patients suspected of having urinary stone disease: effect of section width on diagnosis. Radiology 2005; 235: 530.
- Kampa RJ, Ghani KR, Wahed S, et al. Size matters: a survey of how urinary-tract stones are measured in the UK. J Endourol 2005; 19: 856.
- Narepalem N, Sundaram CP, Boridy IC, et al. Comparison of helical computerized tomography and plain radiography for estimating urinary stone size. J Urol 2002; 167: 1235.
- Winfield HN, Weyman P, Clayman RV. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: complications of premature nephrostomy tube removal. J Urol 1986; 136: 77.
- Khan MH, Grant U, Mir K. Is nephrostogram a mandatory investigation prior to removal of neprostomy following PCNL? Presentation at Challenges in Endourology, June 2011, Paris, France.
- Binbay M, Sari E, Tepeler A, et al. Characteristics of patients requiring Double-J placement because of urine leakage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2009; 23: 1945.
- Andonian S, Okhunov Z, Shapiro EY, et al. Diagnostic utility and clinical value of postpercutaneous nephrolithotomy nephrostogram. J Endourol 2010; 24: 1427.
- Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K, et al. Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 184.
- Young AT, Hunter DW, Castaneda-Zuniga WR, et al. Percutaneous extraction of urinary calculi: use of the intercostal approach. Radiology 1985; 154: 633.
- Golijanin D, Katz R, Verstandig A, et al. The supracostal percutaneous nephrostomy for treatment of staghorn and complex kidney stones. J Endourol 1998; 12: 403.
- Stening SG, Bourne S. Supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy for upper pole caliceal calculi. J Endourol 1998; 12: 359.
- Kekre NS, Gopalakrishnan GG, Gupta GG, et al. Supracostal approach in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: experience with 102 cases. J Endourol 2001; 15: 789.
- Aron M, Goel R, Kesarwani PK, et al. Upper pole access for complex lower pole renal calculi. BJU Int 2004; 94: 849.
- Munver R, Delvecchio FC, Newman GE, et al. Critical analysis of supracostal access for percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 2001; 166: 1242.
- Picus D, Weyman PJ, Clayman RV, et al. Intercostal-space nephrostomy for percutaneous stone removal. Am J Roentgenol 1986; 147: 393.
- Forsyth MJ, Fuchs EF. The supracostal approach for percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 1987; 137: 197.
- Ogan K, Pearle MS. Oops we got in the chest: fluoroscopic chest tube insertion for hydrothorax after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Urology 2002; 60: 1098.
- Ogan K, Corwin TS, Smith T, et al. Sensitivity of chest fluoroscopy compared with chest CT and chest radiography for diagnosing hydropneumothorax in association with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Urology 2003; 62: 988.
- Semins MJ, Bartik L, Chew BH, et al. Multicenter analysis of postoperative CT findings after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: defining complication rates. Urology 2011; 78: 291.
- Bjurlin MA, O'Grady T, Kim R, et al. Is routine postoperative chest radiography needed after percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Urology 2012; 79: 791.