The Man of Science
Paul White
Search for more papers by this authorPaul White
Search for more papers by this authorBernard Lightman
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
The man of science flourished in the nineteenth century, roughly between the ages of the natural philosopher and the modern scientist. That science rather than philosophy becomes the key designator signals profound shifts in the production of knowledge, usually examined from the standpoint of professionalization and discipline formation; however, the expression man of science suggests the crucial importance of other frameworks such as personal identity, character formation, and gender construction in defining scientific work, and determining its status and location in nineteenth-century societies. The term invites a comparative approach, for it is unique to English language cultures and has no real counterpart in other European countries where scientific vocations are increasingly bound to, and derived from, state and institutional structures.
References
- Anon. 1887. “Professor Tyndall and the scientific movement,” Nature, 36, No. 923 (July 7): 217–18.
- Babbage, Charles. 1830. Reflections on the Decline of Science in England, and on Some of Its Causes. London: Fellowes.
- Barton, Ruth. 2003. “‘Men of Science’: Language, identity and professionalization in the mid-Victorian scientific community.” History of Science, 41: 73–119.
- Berman, Morris. 1978. Social Change and Scientific Organization: The Royal Institution, 1799–1844. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Brooke, John. 1991. Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Burkhardt, Frederick, and Sidney Smith (eds.) 2013. The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- David Cahan (ed.) 2003. From Natural Philosophy to the Sciences: Writing the History of Nineteenth–Century Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Geoffrey Cantor, Gowan Dawson, Graeme Gooday, Richard Noakes, Sally Shuttleworth, and Jonathan Topham (eds.) 2004. Science in the Nineteenth-Century Periodical: Reading the Magazine of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Andrew Cunningham, and Perry Williams (eds.) 1992. The Laboratory Revolution in Medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Daston, Lorraine, and Otto Sibum. 2003. “Scientific personae and their histories.” Science in Context, 16: 1–8.
- Gavin De Beer (ed.) 1959. “ Darwin's journal.” Bulletin of the British History (Natural History). Historical Series, 2: 3–21.
- Desmond, Adrian. 1998. Huxley: From Devil's Disciple to Evolution's High Priest. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
- Dettlebach, Michael. 1996. “ Global physics and aesthetic empire: Humboldt's physical portrait of the tropics.” In Visions of Empire: Voyages, Botany, and Representations of Nature, edited by David Philip Miller and Peter Hans Reill, 258–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Drayton, Richard. 2000. Nature's Government: Science, Imperial Britain and the “Improvement” of the World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Elshakry, Marwa. 2010. “When science became Western: Historiographic reflections.” Isis 101: 98–109.
- Endersby, Jim. 2008. Imperial Nature: Joseph Hooker and the Practices of Victorian Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226773995.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Fox, Robert. 2012. The Savant and the State: Science and Cultural Politics in Nineteenth-Century France. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Robert Fox, and George Weisz (eds.) 1980. The Organization of Science and Technology in France, 1808–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Fyfe, Aileen. 2004. Science and Salvation: Evangelical Popular Science Publishing in Victorian Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226276465.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Galton, Francis. 1874. English Men of Science: Their Nature and Nurture. London: Macmillan.
10.5962/bhl.title.26466 Google Scholar
- Gianquitto, Tina. 2007. “ Good Observers of Nature”: American Women and the Scientific Study of the Natural World, 1820–1885. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
- Gillispie, Charles Coulton. 2004. Science and Polity in France: The Revolutionary and Napoleonic Years. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Herschel, John. 1830. Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy. London: Longman.
- Kennedy, Dane Keith. 2005. The Highly Civilized Man: Richard Burton and the Victorian World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.4159/9780674039483 Google Scholar
- Leask, Nigel. 2002. Curiosity and the Aesthetics of Travel Writing, 1770–1840. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Lightman, Bernard. 2007. Victorian Popularizers of Science: Designing Nature for New Audiences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226481173.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Lucier, Paul. 1995. “Commercial interests and scientific disinterestedness: Consulting geologists in antebellum America.” Isis, 86: 245–67.
- Lucier, Paul. 2009. “The professional and the scientist in nineteenth-century America.” Isis, 100: 699–732.
- MacLeod, Roy. 1983. “ Whigs and savants: Reflections on the reform movement in the Royal Society, 1830–48.” In Metropolis and Province: Science in British Culture, 1780–1850, edited by Ian Inkster and Jack Morrell, 55–90. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Marsden, Ben. 2013. “ Re-reading Isambard Kingdom Brunel: Engineering literature in the early nineteenth century.” In Uncommon Contexts: Encounters Between Science and Literature, 1800–1914, edited by Ben Marsden, Hazel Hutchinson, and Ralph O'Connor, 83–109. London: Pickering and Chatto.
- Marsden, Ben, and Crosbie Smith. 2005. Engineering Empires: A Cultural History of Technology in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Morrell, Jack, and Arnold Thackray. 1981. Gentlemen of Science: Early Years of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Outram, Dorinda. 1984. Georges Cuvier: Vocation, Science and Authority in Post-Revolutionary France. Manchester: University of Manchester Press.
- Phillips, Denise. 2012. Acolytes of Nature: Defining Natural Science in Germany, 1770–1850. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226667393.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Porter, Theodore. 2014. “ The fate of scientific naturalism: From public sphere to professional exclusivity.” In Victorian Scientific Naturalism: Community, Identity, Continuity, edited by Bernard Lightman and Gowan Dawson, 265–87. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226109640.003.0011 Google Scholar
- Pratt, Mary Louis. Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation, 2nd edition. London: Routledge, 2008.
- Richards, Evelleen. 1997. “ Redrawing the boundaries: Darwinian science and Victorian women intellectuals.” In Victorian Science in Context, edited by Bernard Lightman, 119–42. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997.
- Ross, Sydney. 1962. “‘Scientist’: The story of a word.” Annals of Science, 18: 65–85.
10.1080/00033796200202722 Google Scholar
- Rowland, Henry. 1883. “A plea for pure science.” Science, 29: 242–50.
- Russett, Cynthia. 1989. Sexual Science: The Victorian Construction of Womanhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Schaffer, Simon. 1990. “ Genius in romantic natural philosophy.” In Romanticism and the Sciences, edited by Andrew Cunningham and Nicolas Jardine, 82–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Secord, James A. 2014. Visions of Science: Books and Readers at the Dawn of the Victorian Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Shapin, Steven. 2008. The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226750170.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Shteir, Ann. 2006. Cultivating Women, Cultivating Science: Flora's Daughters and Botany in England, 1760–1860. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Sivasundaram, Sujit. 2010. “Sciences and the global: On methods, questions, and theory.” Isis, 101: 146–58.
- Sivasundaram, Sujit. 2013. Islanded: Britain, Sri Lanka, and the Bounds of an Indian Ocean Colony. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Turner, Frank. 1993. Contesting Cultural Authority: Essays in Victorian Intellectual Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Tyndall, John. 1868. Faraday as a Discover. London: Longman, Green, and Co.
- [Whewell, William]. 1831. “Modern science—inductive philosophy.” Quarterly Review, 45: 374–407.
- Whewell, William. 1834. “Review of On the Connexion of the Physical Sciences.” Quarterly Review, 51: 54–68.
- Whewell, William. 1840. The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, 2 volumes. London: John Parker.
- White, Paul. 2003. Thomas Huxley: Making the “Man of Science.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- White, Paul. 2005. “Ministers of Culture: Arnold, Huxley, and the Liberal Anglican reform of learning.” History of Science, 43: 115–38.
- Yeo, Richard. 1993. Defining Science: William Whewell, Natural Knowledge, and Public Debate in Early Victorian Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511521515 Google Scholar
- Young, Robert M. 1985. Darwin's Metaphor: Nature's Place in Victorian Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.