Copular Sentences
Andrea Moro
Institute for Advanced Studies of Pavia, Center for Neurocognition, Epistemology and Theoretical Syntax, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAndrea Moro
Institute for Advanced Studies of Pavia, Center for Neurocognition, Epistemology and Theoretical Syntax, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
After a short theoretical and historical introduction to the notion of existential sentence, there-sentences are introduced and their peculiar syntactic properties are illustrated in detail. Two symmetrical accounts are presented as competing to explain these properties: the standard account; and an alternative one, which appears to capture the empirical data in a new, comprehensive fashion, by regarding there-sentences as inverse copular sentences. A discussion of the so-called “definiteness effect” is finally introduced showing how there-sentences still challenge dramatically some major issues of theoretical syntax, including the existence of semantic parameters.
References
- Belletti, Adriana. 1999. “ Inversion as Focalization.” In Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, edited by Aafke Hulke and Jean-Yves Pollock, 60–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Belletti, Adriana, and Luigi Rizzi. 1988. “Psych Verbs and Theta Theory.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6: 291–352.
-
Bennis, Hans, Norbert Corver, and Marcel den Dikken. 1998. “Predication in Nominal Phrases.” Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 1: 85–117.
10.1023/A:1009780124314 Google Scholar
-
Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.
10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7 Google Scholar
- Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
- Chomsky, Noam. 1986a. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Chomsky, Noam. 1986b. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York, NY: Praeger.
- Chomsky, Noam. 2000. “ Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, edited by Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Chomsky, Noam. 2013a. “ Poverty of the Stimulus: Willingness to be Puzzled.” In Rich Languages from Poor Imputs, edited by Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini and Robert Berwick. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Chomsky, Noam. 2013b. “Problems of Projection.” Lingua, 18: 1–35.
- Cinque, Guglielmo. 1980. “Extraction from NP in Italian.” Journal of Italian Linguistics, 5: 47–99.
- Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of A′-Dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Cinque, Guglielmo. 1992. “Functional Projections and N-Movement within the DP.” GLOW Newsletter, 28: 12–13.
- Denes, G. 2011. Talking Heads: The Neuroscience of Language. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.
- Dikken, Marcel den. 1998. “Review of Moro (1997).” Linguistische Berichte, 174: 246–263.
-
Dikken, Marcel den. 2006. Relators and Linkers: The Syntax of Predication, Predicate Inversion and Copulas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Geach, Peter. 1962. Reference and Generality. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Giorgi, Alessandra, and Giuseppe Longobardi. 1991. The Syntax of Noun Phrases: Configuration, Parameters, and Empty Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Guéron, Jacqueline. 1992. “Types syntaxiques et types sémantiques: la phrase copulative comme palimpseste.” Revue Québécoise de Linguistique, 22: 77–115.
10.7202/602754ar Google Scholar
- Heggie, L. 1988. “ The Syntax of Copular Structures .” PhD diss., University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
- Heycock, Caroline. 1994. Layers of Predication: The Non-Lexical Syntax of Clauses. New York, NY: Garland.
- Heycock, Caroline, and Anthony Kroch. 1999. “Pseudocleft Connectedness: Implications for the LF Interface Level.” Linguistic Inquiry, 30: 365–398.
- Higgins, Francis Roger. 1979. The Pseudo-Cleft Construction in English. New York, NY: Garland.
- Hoekstra, Teun, and René Mulder. 1990. “Unergatives as Copular Verbs.” Linguistic Review, 7: 1–79.
- Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.
- Kandel, Eric, James Schwartz, Thomas Jessell, et al. 2013. Principles of Neural Science. New York, NY: McGrawHill Medical.
- Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Kayne, Richard. 2011. “ Why Are There No Directionality Parameters?” In Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, edited by Mary Byram Washburn, Katherine McKinney-Bock, Erika Varis et al., 1–23.
- Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1985. “ Su alcune proprietà della sintassi e della forma logica delle frasi copulari.” In Sintassi e morfologia della lingua italiana d'uso: teorie ed applicazioni descrittive, edited by Annalisa Franchi de Bellis and Leonardo M. Savoia, 211–224. Rome: Bulzoni.
- Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1999. “ Different Types of Inverted Subjects .” MS, University of Trieste.
- Moro, Andrea. 1987. “ Tempo e predicazione nella sintassi delle frasi copulari.” PhD diss., University of Pavia.
- Moro, Andrea. 1988. “Per una teoria unificata delle frasi copulari.” Rivista di Grammatica Generativa, 13: 81–110.
- Moro, Andrea. 1991. “The Raising of Predicates.” MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 15: 193–218.
- Moro, Andrea. 1993. “Heads as Antecedents: A Brief History of the ECP.” Lingua e Stile, 28: 31–57.
-
Moro, Andrea. 1997. The Raising of Predicates: Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511519956 Google Scholar
- Moro, Andrea. 2000. Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Moro, Andrea. 2009. “ Rethinking Symmetry: A Note on Labelling and the EPP.” In La grammatica tra storia e teoria: Scritti in onore di Giorgio Graffi, edited by P. Cotticelli Kurras and A. Tomaselli, 129–31. Alessandria: Edizioni dell'Orso. (Also at http://www.ledonline.it/snippets/allegati/snippets19007.pdf.)
- Moro, Andrea. 2010. Breve storia del verbo “essere.” Milan: Adelphi.
- Moro, Andrea. 2013. The Equilibrium of Human Syntax: Symmetries in the Brain. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Poletto, Cecilia. 1993. La sintassi del soggetto nei dialetti italiani settentrionali. Padua: Unipress.
- Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. “ The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery.” In Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax, edited by Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Roberts, Ian. 1988. “Predicative APs.” Linguistic Inquiry, 19: 703–710.
- Rothstein, Susan. 1983. “ The Syntactic Forms of Predication.” PhD diss., MIT.
- Russell, Bertrand. 1903. The Principles of Mathematics. London: Allen & Unwin.
- Ruwet, Nicolas. 1975. “ Les Phrases copulatives.” Recherches Linguistiques, 3: 143–191. Paris: University of Paris-Vincennes.
- Stowell, Tim. 1978. “ What Was There Before There Was There.” In Papers from the Fourteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, edited by Donka Farkas, Wesley M. Jacobsen, and Karol W. Todrys, 458–471.
- Verhaar, John W. M. 1967. The Verb Be and Its Synonyms, Part I: Classical Chinese, Athapaskan, Mundari. Dordrecht: Reidel.
- Verhaar, John W. M. 1968a. The Verb Be and Its Synonyms, Part II: Eskimo, Hindi, Zuni, Modern Greek, Malayalam, Kurukh. Dordrecht: Reidel.
- Verhaar, John W. M. 1968b. The Verb Be and Its Synonyms, Part III: Japanese, Kashmiri, Armenian, Hungarian, Sumerian, Shona. Dordrecht: Reidel.
-
Verhaar, John W. M.
1969. The Verb Be and Its Synonyms, Part IV: Modern Chinese, Arabic. Dordrecht: Reidel.
10.1007/978-94-011-9804-2 Google Scholar
-
Verhaar, John W. M.
1972. The Verb Be and Its Synonyms, Part V: Urdu, Turkish, Bengali, Amharic, Indonesian, Telugu, Estonian. Dordrecht: Reidel.
10.1007/978-94-017-3498-1 Google Scholar
- Verhaar, John W. M. 1973. The Verb Be and Its Synonyms, Part VI: The Verb Be in Ancient Greek. Dordrecht: Reidel.
- Williams, Edwin. 1980. “Predication.” Linguistic Inquiry, 11: 203–238.
- Zamparelli, Roberto. 1995. “ Layers in the Determiner Phrase.” PhD diss., University of Rochester.
Citing Literature
The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition
Browse other articles of this reference work: