Chapter 19
Assessment and Improvement of Methods for Microbial DNA Preparation from Fecal Samples
Mariko Ueno, Mami Kikuchi,
Kenshiro Oshima, Seok-won Kim, Hidetoshi Morita, Masahira Hattori,
Mami Kikuchi
Kureha Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
The University of Tokyo, Chiba, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorMariko Ueno, Mami Kikuchi,
Kenshiro Oshima, Seok-won Kim, Hidetoshi Morita, Masahira Hattori,
Mami Kikuchi
Kureha Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
The University of Tokyo, Chiba, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorBook Editor(s):Frans J. de Bruijn,
Frans J. de Bruijn
Laboratory of Plant Micro-organism Interaction, CNRS-INRA, Castanet Tolosan, France
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
This chapter contains sections titled:
-
Introduction
-
Materials and Methods
-
Results and Discussion
-
References
Reference
- Aguilera A, Gómez F, Lospitao E, Amils R. 2006. A molecular approach to the characterization of the eukaryotic communities of an extreme acidic environment: Methods for DNA extraction and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 29: 593–605.
- Carrigg C, Rice O, Kavanagh S, Collins G, O’Flaherty V. 2007. DNA extraction method affects microbial community profiles from soils and sediment. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 77: 955–964.
- Diaz-Torres ML, Villedieu A, Hunt N, McNab R, Spratt DA, Allan E, Mullany P, Wilson M. 2006. Determining the antibiotic resistance potential of the indigenous oral microbiota of humans using a metagenomic approach. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 258: 257–262.
- Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P. 1998. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 8: 175–185.
- Gill SR, Pop M, Deboy RT, Eckburg PB, Turnbaugh PJ, et al. 2006. Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome. Science 312: 1355–1359.
- Grice EA, Kong HH, Renaud G, Young AC, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, et al. 2008. A diversity profile of the human skin microbiota. Genome Res. 18: 1043–1050.
- Handelsman J. 2004. Metagenomics: Application of genomics to uncultured microorganisms. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 68: 669–685.
- Hattori M, Taylor TD. 2009. The human intestinal microbiome: A new frontier of human biology. DNA Res. 16: 1–12.
- Jones BV, Marchesi Jr. 2007. Accessing the mobile metagenome of the human gut microbiota. Mol. Biosyst. 3: 749–758.
- Kataoka K, Kibe R, Kuwahara T, Hagiwara M, Arimochi H, Iwasaki T, Benno Y, Ohnishi Y. 2007. Modifying effects of fermented brown rice on fecal microbiota in rats. Anaerobe 13: 220–227.
- Kurokawa K, Itoh T, Kuwahara T, Oshima K, Toh H, et al. 2007. Comparative metagenomics revealed commonly enriched gene sets in human gut microbiomes. DNA Res. 14: 169–181.
- Lozupone C, Hamady M, Knight R. 2006. UniFrac—an online tool for comparing microbial community diversity in a phylogenetic context. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 371.
- Mai V, Draganov PV. 2009. Recent advances and remaining gaps in our knowledge of associations between gut microbiota and human health. World J. Gastroenterol. 15: 81–85.
- Matsuki T, Watanabe K, Fujimoto J, Miyamoto Y, Takada T, Matsumoto K, Oyaizu H, Tanaka R. 2002. Development of 16S rRNA-gene-targeted group-specific primers for the detection and identification of predominant bacteria in human feces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68: 5445–5551.
- McOrist AL, Jackson M, Bird AR. 2002. A comparison of five methods for extraction of bacterial DNA from human faecal samples. J. Microbiol. Methods 50: 131–139.
- Morita H, Kuwahara T, Ohshima K, Sasamoto H, Itoh K, Hattori M, Hayashi T, Takami H. 2007. An improved DNA isolation method for metagenomic analysis of the microbial flora of the human intestine. Microbes Environ. 22: 214–222.
- Morita H, Nakajima F, Murakami M, Endo A, Suzuki T, Shiratori C, Kato Y, Okatani A, Akita H, Masaoka T. 2007. Molecular monitoring of the main changes in bacterial floral diversity in the gastrointestinal tract of a thoroughbred foal with catarrhal enteritis by using PCR-DGGE. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 27: 14–19.
- Mullany P, Hunter S, Allan E. 2008. Metagenomics of dental biofilms. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 64: 125–136.
- Rajendhran J, Gunasekaran P. 2008. Strategies for accessing soil metagenome for desired applications. Biotechnol Adv. 26: 576–590.
- Roh C, Villatte F, Kim BG, Schmid RD. 2006. Comparative study of methods for extraction and purification of environmental DNA from soil and sludge samples. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 134: 97–112.
- Ribosomal Database Project. http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/
- Salonen A, Nikkilä J, Jalanka-Tuovinen J, Immonen O, RajilićStojanović M, Kekkonen RA, Palva A, de Vos WM. 2010. Comparative analysis of fecal DNA extraction methods with phylo-genetic microarray: Effective recovery of bacterial and archaeal DNA using mechanical cell lysis. J. Microbiol. Methods 81: 127–134.
- Schloss PD, Handelsman J. 2005. Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 1501–1506.
- Tang JN, Zeng ZG, Wang HN, Yang T, Zhang PJ, et al. 2008. An effective method for isolation of DNA from pig faeces and comparison of five different methods. J. Microbiol. Methods 75: 432–436.
- Yu Z, Morrison M. 2004. Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. Biotechniques 36: 808–812.
- Zoetendal EG, Ben-Amor K, Akkermans AD, Abee T, de Vos WM. 2001. DNA isolation protocols affect the detection limit of PCR approaches of bacteria in samples from the human gastrointestinal tract. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 24: 405–410.
- Zoetendal EG, Heilig HG, Klaassens ES, Booijink CC, Kleerebezem M, Smidt H, de Vos WM. 2006. Isolation of DNA from bacterial samples of the human gastrointestinal tract. Nat. Protoc. 1: 870–873.
