Aging in the United States: Challenges to Social Policy and Policy Practice
Enid Opal Cox
University of Denver, Graduate School of Social Work, Denver, Colorado, US
Search for more papers by this authorEnid Opal Cox
University of Denver, Graduate School of Social Work, Denver, Colorado, US
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
For decades gerontologists in the United States, Europe, Japan, and elsewhere in economically advantaged capitalist and socialist countries, as well as gerontologists who were working with nongovernmental organizations, such as Help Age International and governmental organizations serving India, China, and other developing countries, have advocated for attention to the increasing numbers of older persons. These advocacy efforts have focused on both the needs of older adults as well as issues related to their societal roles. At the turn of the century, the dramatic increase in the number of older adults in countries around the world, the increasing percentage of national populations represented by those 65 and older, increased longevity, concerns about the dependency ratio, and, to a lesser extent, growing diversity within this older population—both worldwide and within national jurisdictions—have generated attention.
Policy practice targeting governmental, private-foundation, and organizational/agency policies can be a major contributor to the development of opportunities for expansion of social work interventions in a wide variety of new settings or in settings in which social work is poorly represented. In addition to the development of more diverse settings, opportunities for implementation of new models of practice and practice approaches that are not often supported in existing settings must be supported in both new and existing social work settings.
The development of settings that promote efficacy-building and partnership approaches to intervention can greatly enhance the partnerships with older adults critical to social action and policy change.
References
- Administration on Aging. (2005). A profile of older Americans: 2005. Retrieved May 23, 2006, from www.aoa.gov/prof/Statistics/profile/profiles.asp.
- Administration on Aging. (2006). 2006 HHS poverty guidelines. Retrieved May 23, 2006, from www.aoa.gov/prof/poverty_guidelines/poverty_guidelines.asp.
- R. Ambrosino, J. Heffernan, G. Shuttlesworth, & R. Ambrosino (Eds.). (2005). Social work and social welfare: An introduction ( 5th ed.). Southbank, Victoria, Australia: Brooks-Cole/Thompson Learning.
- Applebaum, R., & Payne, M. (2005, Spring). How supplemental security income works. Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging, 29(1), 27–29.
- Atchley, R. C., & Barusch, A. S. (2004). Social forces and aging: An introduction to social gerontology ( 10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
- Austin, C. D., Camp, E. D., Flux, D., McClelland, R. W., & Sieppert, J. (2005). Community development with older adults in their neighborhoods: The Elder-Friendly Communities Program. Families in Society: Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 86(3), 401–409.
- Axinn, J., & Stern, M. J. (2005). Social welfare: A history of the American response to need ( 6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
- Barnett, R. C. (2005). Ageism and sexism in the workplace. Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging, 29(3), 25–30.
- Barusch, A. S. (2006). Foundations of social policy: Social justice in human perspective ( 2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks-Cole/Thompson Learning.
- Binstock, R. H. (2004, Spring). Advocacy in an era of neoconservatism: Responses of natural aging organizations. Generations, 28(1), 49–57.
- Bush, G. (2005). Strengthening Social Security for future generations. Retrieved June 27, 2006, from www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/social-security/.
- Butler, R. N. (2006). Ageism in America: The status reports. New York: International Longevity Center-USA.
- Caro, F. G., Bass, S. A., & Chen, Y.-P. (2006). Achieving a productive aging society. In H. R. Moody (Ed.), Aging concepts and controversies ( 5th ed., pp. 246–251). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage/Pine Forge Press.
- Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement. (2002). Aging, information technology and the new millennium. Ithaca, NY: Edward R. Roybal Centers for Research on Applied Gerontology.
-
Charness, N.
(2005, Fall).
Age, technology, and culture: Gerontopia or dystopia?
Public Policy and Aging Report,
15(4),
20–23.
10.1093/ppar/15.4.20 Google Scholar
- Cohen, E. S. (2001). The complex nature of ageism: What is it? Who does it? Who perceives it? Gerontologist, 41(5), 576–577.
-
Coughlin, J. F., &
Lau, J.
(2006a, Winter).
Cathedral builders wanted: Constructing a new vision of technology for old age.
Public Policy and Aging Report,
16(1),
4–8.
10.1093/ppar/16.1.4 Google Scholar
- Coughlin, J. F., & Lau, J. (2006b, March/April). Invention vs. innovation: Technology and the future of aging. Aging Today, 27(2), 3–4.
- Cox, D., & Pawar, M. (2006). International social work: Issues, strategies, and programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Cox, E. O., & Chapin, R. (2001). Changing the paradigm: Strengths-based and empowerment-oriented social work with frail elders. In E. O. Cox, E. S. Kelchner, & R. Chapin (Eds.), Gerontological social work practice: Issues, challenges, and potential (pp. 165–179). New York: Hawthorne Press.
- Cox, E. O., & Parsons, R. (1994). Empowerment-oriented social work practice with the elderly. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
- Day, P. J. (2003). A new history of social welfare ( 4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
- Dressel, P., Minkler, M., & Yen, I. (1999). Gender, race, class, and aging: Advances and opportunities. In M. Minkler & C. L. Estes (Eds.), Critical gerontology: Perspectives from political and moral economy (pp. 275–294). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
- Ehrenreich, B. (2002, June/July). Everyday needs consume energy, wages. Habitat world: The Publication of Habitat for Humanity International. Retrieved June 23, 2006, from www.habitat.org/hw/june-july02/feature5.html.
- Ekerdt, D. J. (2004). Born to retire: The foreshortened life course. Gerontologist, 44(1), 3–9.
-
Estes, C. L.
(2001a).
Crisis, the welfare state and aging. In
C. Estes (Ed.),
Social policy and aging: A critical perspective (pp.
95–117).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
10.4135/9781452232676.n5 Google Scholar
- Estes, C. L. (2001b). Social policy and aging: A critical perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
-
Estes, C. L.,
Wallace, S. P.,
Linkins, K. W., &
Binney, E. A.
(2001).
The medicalization and commodification of aging and the privatization and rationalization of old age policy. In
C. L. Estes (Ed.),
Social policy and aging: A critical perspective (pp.
45–60).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
10.4135/9781452232676.n3 Google Scholar
- Friedland, R. B., & Summer, L. (2005, March). Demography is not destiny, revisited. Georgetown, DC: Georgetown University, Center on an Aging Society. Retrieved May 12, 2006, from www.cmwf.org/usr_doc/789_friedland_demographynotdestinyII.pdf.
- Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
- Gerber, J. (1999). International economics. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
- Ghilarducci, T. (2006, May). The end of retirement. Monthly Review, 58(1), 12–27.
- Gilbert, N., & van Voorhis, R. (Eds.). (2003). Changing patterns of social protection. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
- Greene, R. R., & Cohen, H. L. (2005). Social work with older adults and their families: Changing practice paradigms. Families in Society: Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 86(3), 367–373.
- Gutierrez, L. M., Parsons, R., & Cox, E. O. (Eds.). (1998). Empowerment in social work practice: A sourcebook. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole/Thompson Learning.
- Hart, G. (2006). God and Caesar in America. Golden, CO: Fulcrum.
- Herd, P. (2005). Universalism without targeting: Privatizing the old-age welfare state. Gerontologist, 45(3), 292–298.
- Holstein, M. (1999). Women and productive aging: Troubling implications. In M. Minkler & C. L. Estes (Eds.), Critical gerontology: Perspectives from political and moral economy (pp. 359–373). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
- Hooyman, N. R., & Kiyak, H. A. (2005). Social gerontology: A multidisciplinary perspective ( 7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
- Hudson, R. B. (1997). The history and place of age-based public policy. In R. B. Hudson (Ed.), The future of age-based public policy (pp. 1–22). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Hudson, R. B. (2005). The new political environment in aging: Challenges to policy and practice. Families in Society: Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 86(3), 321–327.
- Hudson, R. B. (2006, Winter). The White House Conference on Aging: No time for seniors. Public Policy and Aging Report, 16(1), 1–3.
- Jansson, B. (1999). Becoming an effective policy advocate: From policy practice to social justice. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
- Karger, H. J., & Stoesz, D. (2005). American social welfare policy: A pluralist approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
-
Kunkel, S., &
Nelson, I.
(2005, Fall).
Consumer direction: Changing the landscape of long-term care.
Public Policy and Aging Report,
15(4),
13–16.
10.1093/ppar/15.4.13 Google Scholar
- Lakoff, G. (2004). Don't think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
-
Leonard, P.
(1997).
Postmodern welfare: Reconstructing an emancipatory project.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
10.4135/9781446278895 Google Scholar
- Libson, N. (2006). The sad state of affordable housing for older people. Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging, 29(4), 9–15.
- Macarov, D. (2003). What the market does to people: Privatization, globalization and poverty. Atlanta, GA: Clarity Press.
- Manning, S. S. (1998). Empowerment in mental health programs: Focusing on fields. In L. M. Gutierrez, R. Parsons, & E. O. Cox (Eds.), Empowerment in social work practice: A sourcebook (pp. 89–107). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole/Thompson Learning.
- McMichael, P. (2000). Development and social change: A global perspective ( 2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
- Medicare and Medicaid (originally known as Health Insurance for the Aged Act of 1965), Pub. L. No. 89-97, 79 Stat. 290 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 42 U.S.C.)
- Minkler, M. (2006). “Generational equity” and victim blaming. In H. R. Moody (Ed.), Aging: Concepts and controversies ( 5th ed., pp. 181–190). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
- Moody, H. R. (2006). Aging: Concepts and controversies ( 5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
- Morrow-Howell, N. (2006, Winter). Civic engagement at the 2005 White House Conference on Aging. Public Policy and Aging Report, 16(1), 13–17.
- National Association of Area Agencies on Aging. (2006). [Homepage]. Retrieved July 3, 2006, from www.n4a.org.
- Novak, M. (2006). Issues in aging. Boston: Pearson Education.
- Older Americans Act of 1965, 42 U.S.C. § 35-1-3001 [Congressional declaration of objectives]. Retrieved June 30, 2006, from www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode42/usc_sup_01_42_10_35.html.
- Older Americans Act (OAA) reauthorization proposal of 2006, H.R. 6179. Retrieved on July 6, 2006 from www.ncoa.org/attachments/OAAReport.pdf.
- Palmore, E. (2005, Fall). Three decades of research on ageism. Generations, 29(3), 87–90.
- Phillipson, C. (1999). The social construction of retirement: Perspectives from critical theory and political economy. In M. Minlker & C. Estes (Eds.), Critical gerontology: Perspectives from political and moral economy (pp. 315–327). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
- Robertson, A. (1999). Beyond apocalyptic demography: Toward a moral economy of interdependence. In M. Minkler & C. Estes (Eds.), Critical gerontology: Perspectives from political and moral economy (pp. 75–90). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
- Rock Ridge Institute. (2006). [Homepage]. Retrieved June 27, 2006, from www.rockridgeinstitute.org.
- Rosalynn Carter Institute for Caregiving. (2004). Caregivers together: Establishing your own care-net—The Community Caregivers Network [Manual]. Americus: Georgia Southwestern State University.
- Rosen, A. L., & Zlotnik, J. L. (2001). Demographics and reality: The “disconnect” in social work education. In E. O. Cox, E. S. Kelchner, & R. Chapin (Eds.), Gerontological social work practice: Issues, challenges and potential (pp. 81–97). New York: Haworth Press.
- Rother, J. (2004). Why haven't we been more successful advocates of elders? Generations, 28(1), 55–58.
- Rowe, J., & Kahn, K. (1997). Successful aging. New York: Pantheon.
- Schieber, S. J. (1997). A new vision for Social Security: Personal security accounts as an element of Social Security reform. In R. B. Hudson (Ed.), The future of age-based public policy (pp. 134–143). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Schultz, J. H. (2001). The economics of aging ( 7th ed.). Westport, CT: Auburn House.
- Silverstone, B. (2005). Social work with the older people of tomorrow: Restoring the person-in-situation. Families in Society: Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 86(3), 309–319.
- Social Security Act of 1935, Ch. 531, 49 Stat. 620 (1935).
- Social Security Administration. (2004). Income sources of aged units: Percentage with income from specified source, by marital status, sex of non-married persons, and age, 2004. Retrieved May 14, 2006, from www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/statcomps/income_pop55/2004/sect01.pdf.
- Social Security Administration. (2005). SSI federal payment amounts. In Social Security Online. Retrieved June 2, 2006, from www.ssa.gov/OACT/COLA/SSI.html.
- SPRY Foundation. (2005). Computer-based technology and caregiving of older adults: What's new, what's next? Washington, DC: Author.
-
Stoller, E. P., &
Gibson, R. C.
(2000).
Worlds of difference: Inequality in the aging experience.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Pine Forge Press.
10.4135/9781483328539 Google Scholar
- Stone, R. (2004). Where have all the advocates gone? Generations, 28(1), 59–64.
- Takamura, J. (2001). Towards a new era in aging and social work. In E. O. Cox, E. S. Kelchner, & R. Chapin (Eds.), Gerontological social work practice: Issues, challenges and potential (pp. 1–11). New York: Haworth Press.
- Torres-Gil, F. (2001). Multiculturalism, social policy and the new aging. In E. O. Cox, E. S. Kelchner, & R. Chapin (Eds.), Gerontological social work practice: Issues, challenges and potential (pp. 13–32). New York: Haworth Press.
- Tout, K. (1989). Aging in developing countries. New York: Oxford University Press.
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2006, January 24). Annual update of the HHS poverty guidelines. Federal Register, 71(15), 3848–3849.
- Wells, L. M., & Taylor, L. E. (2001). Gerontological social work practice: A Canadian perspective. In E. O. Cox, E. S. Kelchner, & R. Chapin (Eds.), Gerontological social work practice: Issues, challenges, and potential (pp. 33–50). New York: Hawthorne Press.
- Wilson, K. B. (2005–2006, Winter). Introduction: Where older people live, how needed care is provided. Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging, 29(4), 5–8.
Comprehensive Handbook of Social Work and Social Welfare
Browse other articles of this reference work: