Biomonitoring†
Based in part on the article “Biomonitoring” by Loveday L. Conquest, which appeared in the Encyclopedia of Environmetrics.
Abstract
In its ecological sense, biomonitoring refers to the recording of observations of animal or plant populations, often over space and time. Owing to the possible presence of spatially and temporally correlated observations, the “what, where, when, and how” of biomonitoring studies must be carefully considered, beginning with the choice of appropriate response variables to measure. There are many available methods to analyze data from biomonitoring field studies or experiments. The standard toolbox of statistical techniques, particularly in the area of regression analysis, now includes generalized linear models and generalized additive models. These allow the incorporation of non-Gaussian (non-normal) error terms, and can describe nonlinear relationships using nonparametric smoothing functions. Analysis of a single dataset may include liberal use of graphics, handling of data with heterogeneous variances and below detection limits, and dealing with irregular coverage through space and time. A multipronged approach to analysis of complex datasets that often arise from biomonitoring studies is not unusual.
References
- 1
P.G. Wells
J.N. Butler, &
J.S.E. Hughes, eds.
(1995).
Exxon Valdez Oil Spill: Fate and Effects in Alaskan Waters,
American Society for Testing and Materials,
Philadelphia, Special Technical Publication 1219.
10.1520/STP1219-EB Google Scholar
- 2 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2010). Wildlife Data Tables [Fact sheets]. Retrieved from http://www.noaa.gov/deepwaterhorizon/publications_factsheets/.
- 3 Sheail, J. (1986). Pesticides and Nature Conservation: The British Experience, 1950–1975, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
- 4 Perugini, M., Di Serafino, G., Giacomelli, A., Medrzycki, P., Sabatini, A.G., Oddo, L.P., Marinelli, E., & Amorena, M. (2009). Monitoring of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in bees (Apis mellifera) and honey in urban areas and wildlife reserves, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 57, 7440–7444.
- 5 Cairns, J. (1984). Are single species toxicity tests alone adequate for estimating environmental-hazard, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 4, 259–273.
- 6 Underwood, A.J. & Peterson, C.H. (1988). Towards an ecological framework for investigating pollution, Marine Ecology-Progress Series 46, 227–234.
- 7 Jameson, S.C., Erdmann, M.V., Darr, J.R., & Potts, K.W. (2001). Charting a course toward diagnostic monitoring: a continuing review of coral reef attributes and a research strategy for creating coral reef indexes of biotic integrity, Bulletin of Marine Science 69, 701–744.
- 8 Underwood, A.J. & Chapman, M.G. (2003). Power, precaution, Type II error and sampling design in assessment of environmental impacts, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 296, 49–70.
- 9 Hellawell, J.M. (1996). Biological Indicators of Freshwater Pollution and Environmental Management, Elsevier, London.
- 10 Ellis, J. & Schneider, D.C. (2008). Spatial and temporal scaling in benthic ecology, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 366, 92–98.
- 11 Labrada-Martagon, B., Tenorio Rodriguez Paoloa, A., & Mendez-Rodriguez Lia, C. (2011). Oxidative stress indicators and chemical contaminants in East Pacific green turtles (Chelonia mydas) inhabiting two foraging coastal lagoons in the Baja California peninsula, Journal of Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology C: Toxicology & Pharmacology 154, 65–75.
- 12 Dissanayake, A., Galloway, T.S., & Jones, M.B. (2011). Seasonal differences in the physiology of Carcinus maenas (Crustacea: Decapoda) from estuaries with varying levels of anthropogenic contamination, Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 93, 320–327.
- 13 Karr, J.R. & Chu, E.W. (2000). Sustaining living rivers, Hydrobiologia 422, 1–14.
- 14 Morley, S.A. & Karr, J.R. (2002). Assessing and restoring the health of urban streams in the Puget Sound basin, Conservation Biology 16, 1498–1509.
- 15 Karr, J.R. & Yoder, C.O. (2004). Biological assessment and criteria improve total maximum daily load decision making, Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE 130, 594–604.
- 16 Hughes, R.M., Paulsen, S.G., & Stoddard, J.L. (2000). EMAP-surface waters: a multiassemblage, probability survey of ecological integrity in the USA, Hydrobiologia 422, 429–443.
- 17 Gallagher, S.P., Wright, D.W., Collins, B.W., & Adams, P.B. (2010). A regional approach for monitoring salmonid status and trends: results from a pilot study in coastal Mendocino County, California, North American Journal of Fisheries Management 30, 1075–1085.
- 18 Leung, A.S. L. & Dudgeon, D. (2011). Scales of spatiotemporal variability in macroinvertebrate abundance and diversity in monsoonal streams: detecting environmental change, Freshwater Biology 56, 1193–1208.
- 19 Underwood, A.J. (1994). On beyond BACI – sampling designs that might reliably detect environmental disturbances, Ecological Applications 4, 3–15.
- 20 Stevens, D.L. & Olsen, A.R. (2003). Variance estimation for spatially balanced samples of environmental resources, Environmetrics 14, 593–610.
- 21 Thompson, S.K. (2002). Sampling, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
- 22 McDonald, L.L., Erickson, W.P., & Strickland, M.D. (1995). Survey design, statistical analysis, and basis for statistical inference in coastal habitat injury assessment: Exxon Valdez oil spill, in Exxon Valdez Oil Spill: Fate and Effects in Alaskan Waters, P.G. Wells, J.N. Butler, & J.S. Hughes, eds, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp. 296–310, Special Technical Publication 1219.
- 23 Peterson, C.H., McDonald, L.L., Green, R.H., & Erickson, W.P. (2001). Sampling design begets conclusions: the statistical basis for detection of injury to and recovery of shoreline communities after the ‘Exxon Valdez’ oil spill, Marine Ecology-Progress Series 210, 255–283.
- 24 Peterson, C.H., McDonald, L.L., Green, R.H., & Erickson, W.P. (2002). The joint consequences of multiple components of statistical sampling designs, Marine Ecology-Progress Series 231, 309–314.
- 25 Manly, B.F. J. (2008). Statistics for Environmental Science and Management, 2nd Edition, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Hoboken, pp. 1–6.
- 26 Gilbert, R.O. (1987). Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
- 27 Messer, J.J., Linthurst, R.A., & Overton, W.S. (1991). An EPA program for monitoring ecological status and trends, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 17, 67–78.
- 28 Jackson, L.E., Engle, V.D., Olsen, A.R., Paulsen, S.G. , & Summers, J.K. (2009). Special issue: the eighth symposium of the environmental monitoring and assessment program (EMAP) – research and partnerships for accountability, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 150, 1–484.
- 29 Vos, P., Meelis, E., & Ter Keurs, W.J. (2000). A framework for the design of ecological monitoring programs as a tool for environmental and nature management, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 61, 317–344.
- 30 Skalski, J.R., Coats, D.A., & Fukuyama, A.K. (2001). Criteria for oil spill recovery: a case study of the intertidal community of Prince William Sound, Alaska, following the Exxon Valdez oil spill, Environmental Management 28, 9–18.
- 31 Urquhart, N.S., Paulsen, S.G. , & Larsen, D.P. (1998). Monitoring for policy-relevant regional trends over time, Ecological Applications 8, 246–257.
- 32 Skalski, J.R. & Robson, D.S. (1992). Techniques for Wildlife Investigations: Design and Analysis of Capture Data, Academic Press, San Diego.
- 33 Maxwell, D. & Jennings, S. (2005). Power of monitoring programmes to detect decline and recovery of rare and vulnerable fish, Journal of Applied Ecology 42, 25–37.
- 34 Doberstein, C.P., Karr, J.R., & Conquest, L.L. (2000). The effect of fixed-count subsampling on macroinvertebrate biomonitoring in small streams, Freshwater Biology 44, 355–371.
- 35 Nichols, S.J. & Norris, R.H. (2006). River condition assessment may depend on the sub-sampling method: field live-sort versus laboratory sub-sampling of invertebrates for bioassessment, Hydrobiologia 572, 195–213.
- 36 Cochran, W.G. (1977). Sampling Techniques, 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
- 37 Ozturk, O., Bilgin, O.C., & Wolfe, D.A. (2005). Estimation of population mean and variance in flock management: a ranked set sampling approach in a finite population setting, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 75, 905–919.
- 38 Hewitt, J.E. & Thrush, S.F. (2007). Effective long-term ecological monitoring using spatially and temporally nested sampling, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 133, 295–307.
- 39 Olsen, A.R. & Smith, E.P. (1999). Sampling over time (Special Issue), Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 4, 327–514.
- 40 Stewartoaten, A., Bence, J.R., & Osenberg, C.W. (1992). Assessing effects of unreplicated perturbations – no simple solutions, Ecology 73, 1396–1404.
- 41 Di Stefano, J. (2004). A confidence interval approach to data analysis, Forest Ecology and Management 187, 173–183.
- 42 Underwood, A.J. (1992). Beyond BACI – the detection of environmental impacts on populations in the real, but variable, world, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 161, 145–178.
- 43 Underwood, A.J. (2000). Trying to detect impacts in marine habitats: comparisons with suitable reference areas, in Statistics in Ecotoxicology, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, pp. 279–308.
- 44 Fox, D.R. (2001). Environmental power analysis – a new perspective, Environmetrics 12, 437–449.
- 45 Murtaugh, P.A. (2002). On rejection rates of paired intervention analysis, Ecology 83, 1752–1761.
- 46 Murtaugh, P.A. (2007). Simplicity and complexity in ecological data analysis, Ecology 88, 56–62.
- 47 Paul, W.L. (2011). A causal modelling approach to spatial and temporal confounding in environmental impact studies, Environmetrics 22, 626–638.
- 48
Helsel, D.R. &
Hirsch, R.M.
(1992).
Statistical Methods in Water Resources,
Elsevier,
New York.
10.1016/S0166-1116(08)71099-9 Google Scholar
- 49 Faraway, J.J. (2006). Extending the Linear Model with R, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton.
- 50
Wood, S.N.
(2006).
Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R,
Chapman & Hall/CRC Press,
Boca Raton.
10.1201/9781420010404 Google Scholar
- 51 Cade, B.S. & Noon, B.R. (2003). A gentle introduction to quantile regression for ecologists, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1, 412–420.
- 52 Potvin, C. & Roff, D.A. (1993). Distribution-free and robust statistical methods: viable alternatives to parametric statistics? Ecology 74, 1617–1628.
- 53 Mumby, P.J. (2002). Statistical power of non-parametric tests: a quick guide for designing sampling strategies, Marine Pollution Bulletin 44, 85–87.
- 54 Salas, C., Ene, L., Ojeda, N., & Soto, H. (2010). Parametric and non-parametric statistical methods for predicting plotwise variables based on Landsat ETM plus : a comparison in an Araucaria araucana forest in Chile, Bosque 31, 179–194.
- 55 Conquest, L.L. (2000). Environmental monitoring: investigating associations and trends, in Statistics in Ecotoxicology, T. Sparks, ed., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, pp. 179–210.
- 56 Manly, B.F. J. (2007). Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, 3rd edition, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton.
- 57 Dolph, C.L., Sheshukov, A.Y., Chizinski, C.J., Vondracek, B., & Wilson, B. (2010). The Index of Biological Integrity and the bootstrap: can random sampling error affect stream impairment decisions? Ecological Indicators 10, 527–537.
- 58 Darken, P.F., Holtzman, G.I., Smith, E.P., & Zipper, C.E. (2000). Detecting changes in trends in water quality using modified Kendall's tau, Environmetrics 11, 423–434.
- 59
Digby, P.G. N. &
Kempton, R.A.
(1987).
Multivariate Analyses of Ecological Communities,
Chapman & Hall,
London.
10.1007/978-94-009-3135-0 Google Scholar
- 60 Scott, A. & Clarke, K.R. (2000). Multivariate techniques, in Statistics in Ecotoxicology, T. Sparks, ed., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, pp. 149–178.
- 61 Manly, B.F. J. (2005). Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer, 2nd Edition, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton.
- 62
Zuur, A.F.,
Ieno, E.N., &
Smith, G.M.
(2007).
Analysing Ecological Data,
Springer,
New York.
10.1007/978-0-387-45972-1 Google Scholar
- 63 Sparks, T., Newton, I., Dale, L., & Osborn, D. (2000). Organochlorines in bird of prey eggs: a terrestrial case study, in Statistics in ecotoxicology, T. Sparks, ed., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, pp. 211–245.
- 64
Zuur, A.F.,
Ieno, E.N.,
Walkeer, N.J.,
Saveliev, A.A., &
Smith, G.M.
(2009).
Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R,
Springer,
New York.
10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6 Google Scholar