Volume 41, Issue 4 pp. 544-546
Psychodiagnostic Processes: Objective Tests of Ability
Full Access

A comparison of the intertest accuracy of two short forms of the WAIS-R

David F. Cella Ph.D.

Corresponding Author

David F. Cella Ph.D.

Cornell University Medical College and Payne Whitney Clinic, The New York Hospital

Payne Whitney Clinic, Psychology Department, 525 East 68th Street, New York, New York 10021.Search for more papers by this author
Paul B. Jacobsen

Paul B. Jacobsen

Cornell University Medical College and Payne Whitney Clinic, The New York Hospital

Search for more papers by this author
Paul Hymowitz

Paul Hymowitz

Cornell University Medical College and Payne Whitney Clinic, The New York Hospital

Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

The relative efficacy of two short forms of the WAIS-R with respect to accurate subtest profile scatter was examined (N = 50). The subtest scores of both the split-half Satz-Mogel (S-M) short form and the criterion referenced Modified WAIS-R (WAIS-RM) short form were found to differ significantly from full length WAIS-R subtest scores. Direct comparison of the S-M to the WAIS-RM showed the WAIS-RM to provide a closer approximation of full length WAIS-R subtest variability. Therefore, selection of the appropriate WAIS-R short form is best guided by the extent to which accuracy of inter-subtest variability is needed.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.