Volume 88, Issue 1 pp. 108-114
Cancer Therapy

Targeting of a hydrophilic photosensitizer by use of internalizing monoclonal antibodies: A new possibility for use in photodynamic therapy

Maarten B. Vrouenraets

Maarten B. Vrouenraets

Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Gerard W.M. Visser

Gerard W.M. Visser

Radio Nuclide Center, Vrije University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Christophe Loup

Christophe Loup

Laboratoire de Chimie de Coordination du CNRS, Toulouse, France

Search for more papers by this author
Bernard Meunier

Bernard Meunier

Laboratoire de Chimie de Coordination du CNRS, Toulouse, France

Search for more papers by this author
Marijke Stigter

Marijke Stigter

Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Hugo Oppelaar

Hugo Oppelaar

Division of Experimental Therapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Huis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Fiona A. Stewart

Fiona A. Stewart

Division of Experimental Therapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Huis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Gordon B. Snow

Gordon B. Snow

Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Guus A.M.S. van Dongen

Corresponding Author

Guus A.M.S. van Dongen

Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

University Hospital, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Fax: +3120 4443688Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Coupling of photosensitizers to tumor-selective monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) is an attractive option for improving the selectivity of photodynamic therapy (PDT). For this purpose, hydrophilic sensitizers would be most suitable because of their solubility in water. However, such sensitizers are known to be ineffective in PDT, probably because they cannot readily pass the cell membrane and reach the critical intracellular target. We used the model compound TrisMPyP-ΦCO2H, a hydrophilic porphyrin derivative, to test the hypothesis that hydrophilic photosensitizers might become of therapeutic value when directed into the tumor cell by use of internalizing MAbs. TrisMPyP-ΦCO2H was conjugated using a labile ester. Conjugates showed no impairment of integrity on SDS-PAGE, full stability in serum in vitro, and optimal immunoreactivity when the sensitizer:MAb ratio was ≤3. At higher molar ratios, the solubility of the conjugates decreased. In vitro internalization experiments showed that TrisMPyP-ΦCONH–125I-cMAb U36 and TrisMPyPΦCONH–125I-mMAb 425 conjugates were internalized by A431 cells, in contrast to TrisMPyP-ΦCONH–125I-mMAb E48 conjugates. Data on the in vitro efficacy of PDT with MAb-conjugated TrisMPyP-ΦCO2H showed that the internalizing cMAb U36 and mMAb 425 conjugates were phototoxic to A431 cells, while the non-internalizing E48 conjugate and the unconjugated sensitizer were not. Biodistribution data of conjugates with sensitizer:125I-cMAb U36 ratios varying from 1:1 to 3:1 in tumor-bearing nude mice revealed selective accumulation in the tumor. Conjugates with higher molar ratios were cleared more rapidly from the blood than the unconjugated 125I-cMAb U36, resulting in lower tumor uptake but similar tumor-to-blood ratios. Our data suggest that hydrophilic photosensitizers might have therapeutic value when targeted to tumors by internalizing MAbs. Int. J. Cancer 88:108–114, 2000. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.