Data and Safety Monitoring
Peter C. O'Brien
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
Search for more papers by this authorPeter C. O'Brien
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
We consider the role of a Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) in overseeing the conduct of a randomized clinical trial. This includes insuring both the scientific integrity of the study and patient safety, monitoring the occurrence of adverse events and assessing efficacy. Formal stopping rules are particularly useful in clinical trials for monitoring efficacy, with a view towards terminating the trial early if the evidence for or against efficacy becomes overwhelming prior to the scheduled completion of the trial. The most commonly used approaches in formal stopping rules are discussed in some detail. These include the Pocock and O'Brien–Fleming boundaries and the spending function approach developed by Lan and DeMets. Discussion of stochastic curtailment, point and interval estimation associated with early termination, multiple endpoints, and a brief overview of decision theoretic methods (including Bayesian methods) is provided.
References
- 1 Alling, D. W. (1963). Early decision in the Wilcoxon two sample test, Journal of the American Statistical Association 58, 713–720.
- 2 Alling, D. W. (1966). Closed sequential tests for binomial probabilities, Biometrika 53, 73–84.
- 3 Anscombe, F. J. (1963). Sequential medical trials, Journal of the American Statistical Association 58, 365–383.
- 4 Armitage, P. (1960). Sequential Medical Trials. Thomas, Springfield.
- 5 Armitage, P., McPherson, C. K. & Rowe, B. C. (1969). Repeated significance tests on accumulating data, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 132, 235–244.
- 6 Berger, J. O. & Berry, D. A. (1985). Analyzing data: the great conditioning debate, unpublished manuscript.
- 7 Berry, D. A. (1985). Interim analyses in clinical trials: classical vs. Bayesian approaches, Statistics in Medicine 4, 521–526.
- 8 Berry, D. A. & Pearson, L. M. (1985). Optimal designs for clinical trials with dichotomous responses, Statistics in Medicine 4, 497–508.
- 9 Bross, I. (1952). Sequential medical plans, Biometrics 8, 188–205.
- 10 Canner, P. L. (1970). Selecting one of two treatments when the responses are dichotomous, Journal of the American Statistical Association 65, 293–306.
- 11 Chang, M. N. & O'Brien, P. C. (1986). Confidence intervals following group sequential tests, Controlled Clinical Trials 7, 18–26.
- 12 Colton, T. (1963). A model for selecting one of two medical treatments, Journal of the American Statistical Association 58, 388–400.
- 13 DeMets, D. L. & Gail, M. H. (1985). Use of log rank tests and group sequential methods at fixed calendar times, Biometrics 41, 1039–1044.
- 14 DeMets, D. L. & Halperin, M. (1982). Early stopping in the two-sample problem for bounded random variables, Controlled Clinical Trials 3, 1–11.
- 15 Dubey, S. D. (1991). Some thoughts on the one-sided and two-sided tests, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 1, 139–150.
- 16 Fisher, L. D. (1991). The use of one-sided tests in drug trials: an FDA advisory committee member's perspective, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 1, 151–156.
- 17 Fleming, T. R., Harrington, D. P. & O'Brien, P. C. (1984). Designs for group sequential tests, Controlled Clinical Trials 5, 348–361.
- 18 Freedman, L. S. & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (1989). Controlled Clinical Trials 10, 357–367.
- 19 Halperin, M. & Ware, J. H. (1974). Early decision in a censored Wilcoxon two-sample test for accumulating survival data, Journal of the American Statistical Association 69, 414–422.
- 20 Halperin, M., Lan, K. K. G., Ware, J. H., Johnson, N. J. & DeMets, D. L. (1982). An aid to data monitoring in long-term clinical trials, Controlled Clinical Trials 3, 311–323.
- 21 Haybittle, J. L. (1971). Repeated assessment of results in clinical trials of cancer treatment, British Journal of Radiology 44, 793–797.
- 22
Hochberg, Y. and
Tamhane, A. C.
(1987).
Multiple Comparison Procedures.
Wiley,
New York.
10.1002/9780470316672 Google Scholar
- 23 Jennison, C. & Turnbull, B. W. (1984). Repeated confidence intervals for group sequential clinical trials, Controlled Clinical Trials 5, 33–45.
- 24 Koch, G. G. (1991). One-sided and two-sided tests and p values, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 1, 161–170.
- 25 Koch, G. & Gillings, D. (1988). One-sided versus two-sided tests, in Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, Vol. 9, S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson, eds. Wiley, New York, pp. 218–222.
- 26 Lan, K. K. G. & DeMets, D. L. (1983). Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials, Biometrika 70, 659–663.
- 27
Lan, K. K. G.,
Simon, R. &
Halperin, M.
(1982).
Stochastically curtailed tests in long-term clinical trials,
Communication in Statistics, Sequential Analysis
1,
207–219.
10.1080/07474948208836014 Google Scholar
- 28 O'Brien, P. C. (1984). Procedures for comparing samples with multiple endpoints, Biometrics 40, 1079–1087.
- 29 O'Brien, P. C. & Fleming, T. R. (1979). A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials, Biometrics 35, 549–556.
- 30 Overall, J. E. (1991). A comment concerning one-sided tests of significance in new drug applications, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 1, 157–160.
- 31 Peace, K. E. (1991). One-sided or two-sided p values: which most appropriately address the question of drug efficacy?, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 1, 133–138.
- 32 Peto, R., Pike, M. C., Armitage, P., Breslow, N. E., Cox, D. R., Howard, S. V., Mantel, N., McPherson, K., Peto, J. & Smith, P. G. (1976). Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient: I, Introduction and design, British Journal of Cancer 34, 585–612.
- 33 Pocock, S. J. (1977). Group sequential methods in the design and analysis of clinical trials, Biometrika 64, 191–199.
- 34 Proschan, M. A., Follmann, D. A. & Waclawiw, M. A. (1992). Effects of assumption violations on type I error rate in group sequential monitoring, Biometrics 48, 1131–1143.
- 35 Rothman (1986). Modern Epidemiology, 1st Ed. Little, Brown & Company, Boston, pp. 147–150.
- 36
Samuel-Cahn, E.
(1974).
Repeated significance test II, for hypotheses about the normal distribution,
Communications in Statistics
3,
711–733.
10.1080/03610927408827172 Google Scholar
- 37
Samuel-Cahn, E.
(1974).
Two kinds of repeated significance tests, and their application for the uniform distribution,
Communications in Statistics
3,
419–431.
10.1080/03610927408827143 Google Scholar
- 38 Spiegelhalter, D. J., Freedman, L. S. & Parmar, M. K. B. (1994). Bayesian approaches to randomized trials, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 157, 357–416.
- 39 Tsiatis, A. A., Rosnar, G. L. & Mehta, C. R. (1984). Exact confidence intervals following a group sequential test, Biometrics 40, 797–803.
- 40 Whitehead, J. (1983). The Design and Analysis of Sequential Clinical Trials. Ellis Horwood, Chichester.
- 41 Whitehead, J. & Stratton, I. (1983). Group sequential clinical trials with triangular continuation regions, Biometrics 39, 227–236.
Further Reading
-
Ellenberg, S. S.,
Fleming T. R. &
DeMets D. L.
(2002).
Data Monitoring Committees in Clinical Trials.
Wiley.
10.1002/0470854162 Google Scholar