Volume 17, Issue 2 pp. 195-217
Research Article

Voluntary intoxication and criminal responsibility

Douglas B. Marlowe J.D., Ph.D.

Corresponding Author

Douglas B. Marlowe J.D., Ph.D.

Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania, One Commerce Square, 2005 Market Street, Suite 1120, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-7220, USA

Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania, One Commerce Square, 2005 Market Street, Suite 1120, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-7220, USA.Search for more papers by this author
Jennifer B. Lambert J.D., Psy.D.

Jennifer B. Lambert J.D., Psy.D.

Institute for Addictive Disorders, MCP Hahnemann University

Search for more papers by this author
Robert G. Thompson Psy.D.

Robert G. Thompson Psy.D.

Institute for Addictive Disorders, MCP Hahnemann University

Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

This paper reviews the law related to voluntary intoxication and criminal responsibility in the 50 United States, the District of Columbia, the US Virgin islands, and Puerto Rico. Statutory and case law citations are provided which govern the use of intoxication evidence in each jurisdiction to negate mens rea (i.e., to establish diminished capacity), to support an insanity defense, and to mitigate criminal sentencing. Factors that courts typically focus on when deciding whether to admit this evidence in a particular case are discussed, and these factors are related to clinically relevant criteria. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.