Volume 59, Issue 11 pp. 1741-1750
Article

Comparison of rubber reinforcement using various surface-modified precipitated silicas

Valeeporn Thammathadanukul

Valeeporn Thammathadanukul

The Petroleum and Petrochemical College, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand

Search for more papers by this author
John H. O'Haver

Corresponding Author

John H. O'Haver

School of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Oklahoma, 100 E. Boyd, Norman, Oklahoma 73019

School of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Oklahoma, 100 E. Boyd, Norman, Oklahoma 73019===Search for more papers by this author
Jeffrey H. Harwell

Jeffrey H. Harwell

School of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Oklahoma, 100 E. Boyd, Norman, Oklahoma 73019

Search for more papers by this author
Somchai Osuwan

Somchai Osuwan

The Petroleum and Petrochemical College, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand

Search for more papers by this author
Nuchanat Na-Ranong

Nuchanat Na-Ranong

The Rubber Research Institute of Thailand, Lardyao Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand

Search for more papers by this author
Walter H. Waddell

Walter H. Waddell

PPG Industries, Chemicals Group Technical Center, Monroeville, Pennsylvania 15146

Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

The reinforcement of a natural rubber compound by various surface-modified precipitated silicas was compared. Compound physical properties were determined for two silicas differing in surface area and were used as controls to evaluate these silicas after surface modification by using either a bifunctional organosilane coupling agent (γ-mercaptopropyl–trimethoxysilane) or a new surface modification process. This new process is based on the in situ polymerization of organic monomers solubilized inside surfactant bilayers that are adsorbed onto the silica surface to afford silicas modified with styrene–butadiene and styrene–isoprene copolymers. Both surface modification processes afford materials that dramatically increase the compound cure rate, thereby significantly reducing T90 cure times, while also improving tensile properties, tear strength, abrasion resistance, and compression set of the cured compound. The silane-modified silica gives a higher flex-cracking resistance than do the silicas modified by the in situ polymerization of organic monomers, whereas these latter silicas significantly increase rebound resilience and offer greater overall improvements in rubber compound performance. The rubber compound physical properties obtained using the modified, higher surface area Hi-Sil® 255 silica are generally improved relative to those obtained using the modified Hi-Sil® 233 silica. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.