Task-dependent facilitation of motor evoked potentials during dynamic and steady muscle contractions
Zsuzsanna Arányi MD
Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Johannes Mathis MD
Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, SwitzerlandSearch for more papers by this authorChristian W. Hess MD
Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorKai M. Rösler MD
Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorZsuzsanna Arányi MD
Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Johannes Mathis MD
Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, SwitzerlandSearch for more papers by this authorChristian W. Hess MD
Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorKai M. Rösler MD
Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Task-dependent differences in the facilitation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) following cortex stimulation were studied in a proximal (deltoid) and a distal muscle (abductor digiti minimi; ADM) in 23 healthy subjects during both dynamic and steady contractions of the target muscle under isometric and under nonisometric conditions. In the deltoid, MEP amplitudes were significantly greater if stimulation was performed during dynamic contractions than during steady contractions, despite equal background electromyographic levels just prior to the stimulus. The same task-specific extra facilitation of deltoid MEP amplitudes was also found with magnetic stimulation of the brain stem instead of the cortex in 3 subjects. In the ADM, no such task-dependent extra facilitation of MEPs during dynamic contractions was found. It is concluded that in the deltoid, during dynamic contractions, a greater proportion of the spinal motoneurons is close to depolarization threshold (greater “subliminal fringe”) whereas the number of firing motoneurons is similar to that during steady contraction. The lack of task-dependent extra facilitation of MEPs in the ADM is explained by the predominant recruitment principle for force gradation in small hand muscles, which is in contrast to the predominant frequency principle used in proximal muscles. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 21:1309–1316, 1998.
References
- 1 Abbruzzese G, Morena M, Spadavecchia L, Schieppati M: Responses of arm flexor muscles to magnetic and electric brain stimulation during shortening and lengthening tasks in man. J Physiol (Lond) 1994; 481: 499–507.
- 2
Barker AT,
Jalinous R,
Freeston IL:
Non-invasive stimulation of the human motor cortex.
Lancet
1985;
ii:
1106–1107.
10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92413-4 Google Scholar
- 3 Berardelli A, Cowan JMA, Day BL, Dick J, Rothwell JC: The site of facilitation of the response to cortical stimulation during voluntary contraction in man. J Physiol (Lond) 1985; 360: 52.
- 4 Binder-Macleod SA, Clamann HP: Force output of cat motor units stimulated with trains of linearly varying frequency. J Neurophysiol 1989; 61: 208–217.
- 5 Claus D, Mills KR, Murray NMF: The influence of vibration on the excitability of alpha motoneurones. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988; 69: 431–436.
- 6 Date M, Schmid UD, Hess CW, Schmid J: Influence of peripheral nerve stimulation on the responses in small hand muscles to transcranial magnetic cortex stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 1991; 43: 212–223.
- 7 Datta AK, Harrison LM, Stephens JA: Task-dependent changes in the size of response to magnetic brain stimulation in human first dorsal interosseous muscle. J Physiol (Lond) 1989; 418: 13–23.
- 8 Day BL, Riescher H, Struppler A, Rothwell JC, Marsden CD: Changes in the response to magnetic and electrical stimulation of the motor cortex following muscle stretch in man. J Physiol (Lond) 1991; 433: 41–57.
- 9 Denny-Brown DE, Sherrington CS: Subliminal fringe in spinal flexion. J Physiol (Lond) 1928; 66: 175–180.
- 10 Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Pavesi G, Rizzolatti G: Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. J Neurophysiol 1995; 73: 2608–2611.
- 11 Felix D, Wiesendanger M. Pyramidal and non-pyramidal motor cortical effects on distal forelimb muscles of monkeys. Exp Brain Res 1971; 12: 81–91.
- 12 Flament D, Goldsmith P, Buckley CJ, Lemon RN: Task dependence of responses in first dorsal interosseous muscle to magnetic brain stimulation in man. J Physiol (Lond) 1993; 464: 361–378.
- 13 Henneman E: Relation between size of neurons and their susceptibility to discharge. Science 1957; 126: 1345–1347.
- 14 Henneman E, Olson CB: Relations between structure and function in the design of skeletal muscle. J Neurophysiol 1965; 28: 598.
- 15 Henneman E, Somjen G, Carpenter D: Excitability and inhibitability of motoneurons of different sizes. J Neurophysiol 1965; 28: 599–620.
- 16 Henneman E, Somjen G, Carpenter DO: Functional significance of cell size in spinal motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 1965; 28: 560–580.
- 17 Hess CW, Ludin HP: Die transkranielle Kortexstimulation mit Magnetfeldspulsen: Methodische und physiologische Grundlagen. Z EEG EMG 1988; 1988: 209–215.
- 18 Hess CW, Mills KR, Murray NM: Responses in small hand muscles from magnetic stimulation of the human brain. J Physiol (Lond) 1987; 388: 397–419.
- 19 Hess CW, Mills KR, Murray NMF: Magnetic stimulation of the human brain: facilitation of motor responses by voluntary contraction of ipsilateral and contralateral muscles with additional observations on an amputee. Neurosci Lett 1986; 71: 235–240.
- 20 Hess CW, Mills KR, Murray NMF: Magnetic stimulation of the human brain: the effect of voluntary muscle activity. J Physiol (lond) 1986; 378: 37.
- 21 Hufnagel A, Jaeger M, Elger CE: Transcranial magnetic stimulation: specific and non-specific facilitation of magnetic motor evoked potentials. J Neurol 1990; 237: 416–419.
- 22 Inghilleri M, Berardelli A, Cruccu G, Priori A, Manfredi M: Motor potentials evoked by paired cortical stimuli. Electroen-cephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990; 77: 382–389.
- 23 Izumi SI, Findley TW, Ikai T, Andrews J, Daum M, Chino N: Facilitatory effect of thinking about movement on motor-evoked potentials to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 74: 207–213.
- 24 Jones KE, Lyons M, Lemon RN: Recruitment order of motoneurons during functional tasks. Exp Brain Res 1994; 100: 503–508.
- 25 Kernell D, Hultborn H: Synaptic effects on recruitment gain: a mechanism of importance for the input-output relations of motoneurone pools? Brain Res 1990; 507: 176–179.
- 26 Kischka U, Fajfr R, Fellenberg T, Hess CW: Facilitation of motor evoked potentials from magnetic brain stimulation in man: a comparative study of different target muscles. J Clin Neurophysiol 1993; 10: 505–512.
- 27 Komori T, Watson BV, Brown WF: Influence of peripheral afferents on cortical and spinal motoneuron excitability. Muscle Nerve 1992; 15: 48–51.
- 28 Kukulka CG, Clamann HP: Comparison of the recruitment and discharge properties of motor units in human brachial biceps and adductor pollicis during isometric contractions. Brain Res 1981; 219: 45–55.
- 29 Lemon RN, Johansson RS, Westling G: Corticospinal control during reach grasp and precision lift in man. J Neurosci 1995; 15: 6145–6156.
- 30 Loeb GE: Motoneuron task groups: coping with kinematic heterogeneity. J Exp Biol 1985; 115: 137–146.
- 31 Mathis J, Gurfinkel V, Struppler A: Facilitation of motor evoked potentials by postcontraction response (Kohnstamm phenomenon). Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996; 101: 289–297.
- 32 Matthews PBC: Observations on the automatic compensation of reflex gain on varying the preexisting level of motor discharge in man. J Physiol (Lond) 1986; 374: 73–90.
- 33 Nielsen J, Petersen N: Changes in the effect of magnetic brain stimulation accompanying voluntary dynamic contraction in man. J Physiol (Lond) 1995; 484.3: 777–789.
- 34 Nielsen J, Petersen N, Deuschl G: Task-related changes in the effect of magnetic brain stimulation in man. J Physiol (Lond) 1993; 459: 147.
- 35 Péréon Y, Genet R, Guihéneuc P: Facilitation of motor evoked potentials: timing of Jendrassik maneuver effects. Muscle Nerve 1995; 18: 1427–1432.
- 36 Perry J, Bekey GA: EMG-force relationships in skeletal muscle. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1981; 7: 1–22.
- 37 Phillips CG, Porter R: The pyramidal projection to motoneurones of some muscle groups of the baboon's forelimb. Prog Brain Res 1964; 12: 222–242.
- 38 Rösler KM, Hess CW, Heckmann R, Ludin HP: Significance of shape and size of the stimulation coli in magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neurosci Lett 1989; 100: 347–352.
- 39 Rothwell J, Burke D, Hicks R, Stephen J, Woodforth I, Crawford M: Transcranial electrical stimulation of the motor cortex in man: further evidence for the site of activation. J Physiol (Lond) 1994; 481: 243–250.
- 40 Rothwell JC: Physiological studies of electric and magnetic stimulation of the human brain. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 1991; 43: 29–35.
- 41 Rothwell JC, Thompson PD, Day BL, Dick JPR, Kachi T, Cowan JMA, Marsden CD: Motor cortex stimulation in intact man. General characterstics of EMG responses in different muscles. Brain 1987; 110: 1173–1190.
- 42 Thomas CK, Ross BH, Stein RB: Motor unit recruitment in human first dorsal interosseus muscle for static contractions in three directions. J Neurophysiol 1986; 55: 1017–1029.
- 43 Thompson PD, Day BL, Rothwell JC, Dressler D, Maertens De Noordhout A, Marsden CD: Further observations on the facilitation of muscle responses to cortical stimulation by voluntary contraction. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 81: 397–402.
- 44 Ugawa Y, Uesaka Y, Terao Y, Hanajima R, Kanazawa I: Magnetic stimulation of corticospinal pathways at the foramen magnum level in humans. Ann Neurol 1994; 36: 618–624.