Volume 21, Issue 10 pp. 1309-1316

Task-dependent facilitation of motor evoked potentials during dynamic and steady muscle contractions

Zsuzsanna Arányi MD

Zsuzsanna Arányi MD

Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Johannes Mathis MD

Corresponding Author

Johannes Mathis MD

Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland

Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, SwitzerlandSearch for more papers by this author
Christian W. Hess MD

Christian W. Hess MD

Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Kai M. Rösler MD

Kai M. Rösler MD

Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University of Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Task-dependent differences in the facilitation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) following cortex stimulation were studied in a proximal (deltoid) and a distal muscle (abductor digiti minimi; ADM) in 23 healthy subjects during both dynamic and steady contractions of the target muscle under isometric and under nonisometric conditions. In the deltoid, MEP amplitudes were significantly greater if stimulation was performed during dynamic contractions than during steady contractions, despite equal background electromyographic levels just prior to the stimulus. The same task-specific extra facilitation of deltoid MEP amplitudes was also found with magnetic stimulation of the brain stem instead of the cortex in 3 subjects. In the ADM, no such task-dependent extra facilitation of MEPs during dynamic contractions was found. It is concluded that in the deltoid, during dynamic contractions, a greater proportion of the spinal motoneurons is close to depolarization threshold (greater “subliminal fringe”) whereas the number of firing motoneurons is similar to that during steady contraction. The lack of task-dependent extra facilitation of MEPs in the ADM is explained by the predominant recruitment principle for force gradation in small hand muscles, which is in contrast to the predominant frequency principle used in proximal muscles. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 21:1309–1316, 1998.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me