Volume 40, Issue 1 pp. 21-32
Original Study

Guidelines for internal peer review in the cardiac catheterization laboratory

Frederick A. Heupler Jr. MD

Corresponding Author

Frederick A. Heupler Jr. MD

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OhioSearch for more papers by this author
Charles E. Chambers MD

Charles E. Chambers MD

Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania

Search for more papers by this author
Wayne E. Dear MD

Wayne E. Dear MD

Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas

Search for more papers by this author
Debra A. Angello MD

Debra A. Angello MD

Winchester Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Winchester, Virginia

Search for more papers by this author
Mary Heisler RN

Mary Heisler RN

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

The Laboratory Performance Standards Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions has proposed guidelines for establishing an internal peer review program in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. The first step is to establish a committee and a data base. This data base should include quality indicators that reflect: physician qualifications, outcomes of procedures, and processes of care. The outcomes must be risk-adjusted to account for the variable severity of illness. Data should be collected by catheterization laboratory personnel and entered into a laboratory-specific computerized data base. These data must be analyzed and organized into profiles that reflect the quality of care. Based on this information, the Committee would institute the following interventions to improve physician performance: education, clinical practice standardization, feedback and benchmarking, professional interaction, incentives, decision-support systems, and administrative interventions. The legal aspects of peer review are reviewed briefly. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 40:21–32, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.