Volume 88, Issue 2 pp. 136-139
Full Access

Lipoprotein lipase mutations and Alzheimer's disease

Larry Baum

Larry Baum

Department of Chemical Pathology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China

Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China

Search for more papers by this author
Lan Chen

Lan Chen

Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China

Search for more papers by this author
Eliezer Masliah

Eliezer Masliah

Department of Neurosciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California

Search for more papers by this author
Yuen Shan Chan

Yuen Shan Chan

Department of Chemical Pathology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China

Search for more papers by this author
Ho-Keung Ng

Ho-Keung Ng

Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China

Search for more papers by this author
Chi Pui Pang

Corresponding Author

Chi Pui Pang

Department of Chemical Pathology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author

Abstract

Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) helps transfer lipids from lipoprotein particles to cells. In the brain, LPL is present in Alzheimer's disease (AD) amyloid plaques. LPL binds apolipoprotein E (ApoE) lipoprotein particles and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP), an ApoE receptor. Since polymorphisms in both ApoE and LRP influence AD risk, we sought to determine whether LPL mutations also affect AD risk. In a case-control study, the frequencies of two of the most common known LPL mutations were measured in European-Americans either clinically diagnosed or pathologically confirmed as AD or normal control (N) subjects. In clinically diagnosed subjects, the Ser447Ter mutation comprised 9.8% (62/630) of alleles in N and 3.8% (9/238) in AD, a significant difference (P = 0.0057), while the Asn291Ser mutation comprised 1.1% (5/460) of alleles in N and 5.1% (8/158) in AD, also a significant difference (P = 0.0073), though in pathologically confirmed subjects the allele frequencies for AD did not significantly differ from N for either mutation. In clinically diagnosed subjects, LPL mutations were associated with altered AD risk, suggesting a potential role for LPL in the causation of AD. Further studies in different populations should help clarify the questions raised by these results. Am. J. Med. Genet. (Neuropsychiatr. Genet.) 88:136–139, 1999. © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.