Volume 34, Issue 11 pp. 2089-2091
Technical Innovation

Can Sonography Distinguish a Supraorbital Notch From a Foramen?

Ravi K. Garg MD

Ravi K. Garg MD

Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kenneth S. Lee MD

Kenneth S. Lee MD

Department of Radiology, Section of Musculoskeletal Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin USA

Search for more papers by this author
Sarah C. Kohn BS

Sarah C. Kohn BS

Department of Radiology, Section of Musculoskeletal Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin USA

Search for more papers by this author
Mustafa K. Baskaya MD

Mustafa K. Baskaya MD

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ahmed M. Afifi MD

Corresponding Author

Ahmed M. Afifi MD

Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin USA

Division of Plastic Surgery, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

Address correspondence to Ahmed M. Afifi, MD, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Ave, Clinical Science Center, H-4, Madison, WI 53792 USA.Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 October 2015
Citations: 8

Abstract

Diagnostic tools for evaluating the supraorbital rim in preparation for nerve decompression surgery in patients with chronic headaches are currently limited. We evaluated the use of sonography to diagnose the presence of a supraorbital notch or foramen in 11 cadaver orbits. Sonographic findings were assessed by dissecting cadaver orbits to determine whether a notch or foramen was present. Sonography correctly diagnosed the presence of a supraorbital notch in 7 of 7 cases and correctly diagnosed a supraorbital foramen in 4 of 4 cases. We found that sonography had 100% sensitivity in diagnosing a supraorbital notch and foramen. This tool may therefore be helpful in characterizing the supraorbital rim preoperatively and may influence the decision to use a transpalpebral or endoscopic approach for supraorbital nerve decompression as well as the decision to use local or general anesthesia.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.